Carbon Capture and Storage Realising the potential

This report summarises the findings of the two-year UKERC research project: Carbon capture and storage: realising the potential? The aim of the research is to assess the technical, economic, financial and social uncertainties facing carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, and to analyse the potential role they could play in the UK power sector between now and 2030. CCS technologies are often highlighted as a crucial component of future low carbon energy systems – in the UK and internationally. However, it is unclear when these technologies will be technically proven at full scale, and whether their costs will be competitive with other low carbon options. Against this policy background, this report systematically examines the uncertainties facing CCS technologies in the UK. It uses historical evidence to explore these uncertainties, and the conditions under which they can be at least partly resolved. The historical evidence base comprises nine case studies, each of which focuses on a technology that is partly analogous to CCS. The report draws on this evidence to develop potential pathways for CCS in the UK to 2030, and uses this analysis to draw conclusions for current policies and strategies.

[1]  Jia Li,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture retrofit to existing power plants , 2011 .

[2]  Bert Metz,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage , 2005 .

[3]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Branching points for transition pathways : assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future , 2013 .

[4]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Caching the carbon: the politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. , 2009 .

[5]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Estimates of te and in prices from direct mining of known ores , 2009 .

[6]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .

[7]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Developing a set of regulatory analogs for carbon sequestration , 2004 .

[8]  Hannah Chalmers,et al.  Capture-ready supercritical coal-fired power plants and flexible post-combustion CO2 capture , 2009 .

[9]  Henry Jeffrey,et al.  Technology Change and Energy Systems : Learning Pathways for Future Sources of Energy , 2008 .

[10]  Melisa F. Pollak,et al.  Risk governance for geological storage of CO2 under the Clean Development Mechanism , 2009 .

[11]  Luis M. Abadie,et al.  Income risk of EU coal-fired power plants after Kyoto , 2008 .

[12]  David G. Victor,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage at Scale: Lessons from the Growth of Analogous Energy Technologies , 2009 .

[13]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Cost and U.S. public policy for new coal power plants with carbon capture and sequestration , 2009 .

[14]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[15]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology , 2012 .

[16]  John Robinson Energy backcasting A proposed method of policy analysis , 1982 .

[17]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing , 2010 .

[18]  Steve Thomas The development and appraisal of nuclear power. Part II. The role of technical change , 1988 .

[19]  Hans Joachim Schellnhuber,et al.  World in transition: a social contract for sustainability , 2011 .

[20]  Pierce W.F. Riemer,et al.  International perspectives and the results of carbon dioxide capture disposal and utilisation studies , 1995 .

[21]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage , 2009 .

[22]  Mita Giacomini,et al.  One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[23]  Jim Watson,et al.  CCS in the UK: Squaring coal use with climate change? , 2009 .

[24]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[25]  Anders Hansson,et al.  Energy policy on shaky ground? : A study of CCS-scenarios , 2009 .

[26]  Luis M. Abadie,et al.  European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments , 2008 .

[27]  Constantine Hadjilambrinos,et al.  Understanding technology choice in electricity industries: a comparative study of France and Denmark , 2000 .

[28]  T. P. Hughes Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[29]  James Meadowcroft,et al.  Caching the Carbon , 2009 .

[30]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  The Effect of Government Actions on Environmental Technology Innovation: Applications to the Integrated Assessment of Carbon Sequestration Technologies , 2004 .

[31]  Nucci Pearce,et al.  Technology, competition and state intervention : Development paths and public policies in the promotion and commercialisation of light water reactors , 1986 .

[32]  Stephen Thomas The development and appraisal of nuclear power. Part I. Regulatory and institutional aspects , 1988 .

[33]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[34]  Robert Gross,et al.  Risks, revenues and investment in electricity generation: Why policy needs to look beyond costs , 2010 .

[35]  Mark Winskel,et al.  Privatisation and technological change: the case of the British electricity supply industry , 1997 .

[36]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[37]  Jim Watson,et al.  Assessing CCS Viability - A Socio-technical Framework , 2011 .

[38]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2011 .

[39]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies , 2007 .

[40]  A. Hawkes Estimating marginal CO2 emissions rates for national electricity systems , 2010 .

[41]  N. Jakeman,et al.  Carbon capture and storage deployment in the UK: What next after the UK Government's competition? , 2009 .

[42]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Built-in flexibility at retrofitted power plants: What is it worth and can we afford to ignore it? , 2011 .

[43]  Audley Genus Rethinking constructive technology assessment as democratic, reflective, discourse , 2006 .

[44]  Igor Bulatov,et al.  An integrated assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK , 2006 .

[45]  James Saling,et al.  Radioactive Waste Management , 1990 .

[46]  Paul Upham,et al.  The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: An assessment of the key determining factors. Part 2. The social acceptability of CCS and the wider impacts and repercussions of its implementation , 2009 .

[47]  Ulrika Claeson Colpier,et al.  The economics of the combined cycle gas turbine - an experience curve analysis , 2002 .

[48]  Heleen Groenenberg,et al.  Effective EU and Member State policies for stimulating CCS , 2008 .

[49]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy: Energy Systems Modelling , 2008 .

[50]  Mark Winskel,et al.  When Systems are Overthrown , 2002 .

[51]  Fergus McMorrow,et al.  Managing Radioactive Waste Safely: A Framework for Implementing Geological Disposal , 2008 .

[52]  Pw Usher,et al.  UK MARKAL Modelling - Examining Decarbonisation Pathways in the 2020s on the Way to Meeting the 2050 Emissions Target , 2010 .

[53]  Robert Gross,et al.  Winds of change: How high wind penetrations will affect investment incentives in the GB electricity sector , 2011 .

[54]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[55]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Sustainability of photovoltaics: The case for thin-film solar cells , 2009 .

[56]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[57]  Paul Upham,et al.  NEAR CO2. WP 2. Opinion shaping factors towards CCS and local CCS projects: Public and stakeholder survey and focus groups , 2011 .

[58]  Nils Markusson The early development and deployment of FGD in the US (1960s-1970s) , 2012 .

[59]  Laura Cozzi World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2012 .

[60]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Initial evaluation of the impact of post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance , 2007 .

[61]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[62]  C. Feenstra,et al.  Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the dutch CCS case barendrecht , 2011 .

[63]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Valuing flexible operation of power plants with CO2 capture , 2009 .

[64]  T Blundell ENERGY: THE CHANGING CLIMATE. 22ND REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION , 2000 .

[65]  S. Gilfillan,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage in the UK , 2008 .

[66]  Todd Flach,et al.  The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: An assessment of the key determining factors: Part 1. Scientific, technical and economic dimensions , 2009 .

[67]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[68]  James Meadowcroft,et al.  The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage , 2009 .

[69]  Grecia R. Matos,et al.  Historical Statistics for Mineral and Material Commodities in the United States , 2005 .

[70]  R. Cowan Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[71]  Gordon MacKerron Evaluation of nuclear decommissioning and waste management , 2012 .

[72]  Robert Gross,et al.  Great expectations: the cost of offshore wind in UK waters , 2010 .

[73]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage , 2007 .