Implementing innovations within organizations: a systematic review and research agenda

Abstract Contemporary organizations often adopt innovations as their top priority to survive severe global competition and the rapidly changing business environment. Although organizational gains from using an innovation (i.e. innovation success) appear to largely depend on the correct decision to adopt an effective innovation, ultimately, innovation success cannot be obtained until individuals consistently use or implement the innovation (i.e. implementation success). Considering the importance of innovation implementation, we scrutinize the factors influencing the implementation process and outcomes for all innovation types (e.g., technological and process, service and product, and administrative innovation). Specifically, we conduct a systematic review of the existing studies on innovation implementation and categorize the factors into four groups: innovation characteristics, social factors, organizational factors, and individual factors. Drawing on the findings obtained from our investigation and our insights shaped during the systematic review process, we suggest three future research agendas: (a) consider individual factors as the primary predictors of an individual’s implementation behavior toward innovation; (b) examine the possibility that innovations change during their implementation and that multiple forms of implementation outcomes can result; and (c) uncover the implementation mechanism of organizations that continuously adopt and implement innovations over a prolonged period.

[1]  Christian Korunka,et al.  An interview study of 'continuous' implementations of information technology , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Curt R Johansson,et al.  Organizational climate in air traffic control Innovative preparedness for implementation of new technology and organizational development in a rule governed organization. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  L. Flynn,et al.  A Validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker Innovativeness Scale , 1993 .

[4]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[5]  R. Winland,et al.  Motivating employees. , 2014, General dentistry.

[6]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: emperical evidence from Canadian organizations , 2003 .

[7]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Implementing New Manufacturing Technology: The Related Effects of Technology Characteristics and User Learning Activities , 2002 .

[8]  D. E. Arnold The role of HRD in the successful implementation of information systems , 1996 .

[9]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[10]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations: An Up-To-Date Review and Commentary , 1979 .

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[12]  T. Grandon Gill,et al.  Expert Systems Usage: Task Change and Intrinsic Motivation , 1996, MIS Q..

[13]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[14]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[15]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[16]  Georges Haour Resolving the Innovation Paradox , 2004 .

[17]  K. Klein,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation Implementation , 1996 .

[18]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[19]  B. Weiner,et al.  Uncovering middle managers' role in healthcare innovation implementation , 2012, Implementation Science.

[20]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Amy L. Kristof PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[22]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  Capability Traps and Self-Confirming Attribution Errors in the Dynamics of Process Improvement , 2002 .

[24]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[25]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[26]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  The effects of administrative innovation implementation on performance: an organizational learning approach , 2006 .

[28]  Tanya V. Bondarouk,et al.  Framing the implementation of HRM innovation: HR professionals vs line managers in a construction company , 2009 .

[29]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[30]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[31]  Karlheinz Sonntag,et al.  Shedding light on followers' innovation implementation behavior , 2010 .

[32]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[33]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Implementing Process Innovations , 2007 .

[34]  B. Weiner,et al.  Implementation Science a Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change , 2009 .

[35]  L. Jackson,et al.  Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: a multiple case study of synoptic reporting , 2014, Implementation Science.

[36]  K. P. Parboteeah,et al.  The effects of physicians’ personal characteristics on innovation readiness in Taiwan’s hospitals , 2013 .

[37]  Andrew P. McAfee,et al.  Race against the machine : how the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy , 2011 .

[38]  Terri L. Griffith Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[39]  Pedro J. Perez,et al.  Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter?☆ , 2014 .

[40]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[41]  M. Mumford Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation , 2000 .

[42]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[43]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring the Factors Associated with Expert Systems Success , 1995, MIS Q..

[44]  S. Swailes,et al.  Organizational Change , 2006 .

[45]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[46]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[47]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[48]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT-Based Innovations: Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[49]  R. Urquhart,et al.  Exploring the interpersonal-, organization-, and system-level factors that influence the implementation and use of an innovation-synoptic reporting-in cancer care , 2012, Implementation Science.

[50]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[51]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[52]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Managing the change to an automated office: lessons from five case studies , 1988 .

[53]  J. Durlak,et al.  Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[54]  Savvas A. Tassou,et al.  Strategic planning, transfer and implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT). Development of an integrated process plan , 2002 .

[55]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[56]  Richard H. Price,et al.  The effects of person–innovation fit on individual responses to innovation , 2005 .

[57]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[58]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[59]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[61]  Anit Somech,et al.  Can we win them all? Benefits and costs of structured and flexible innovation- implementations , 2004 .

[62]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[63]  The use of stock market returns in antitrust analysis of mergers , 1992 .

[64]  R. Tett,et al.  Situation Trait Relevance, Trait Expression, and Cross-Situational Consistency: Testing a Principle of Trait Activation , 2000 .

[65]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[66]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  Inertial Forces and the Implementation of a Socio-Technical Systems Approach: A Communication Study , 1995 .

[67]  A. Bandura Reflections on self-efficacy , 1978 .

[68]  D.H.R. Price,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Loose or Tight Control? , 1998 .

[69]  Alicia C. Bunger,et al.  Context matters: measuring implementation climate among individuals and groups , 2014, Implementation Science.

[70]  Eric C. Turner,et al.  Innovation diffusion and technology acceptance: The case of PKI technology , 2006 .

[71]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Successful IS innovation: the contingent contributions of innovation characteristics and implementation process , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[72]  Chitu Okoli,et al.  A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[73]  P. Bordia,et al.  Haunted by the Past: Effects of Poor Change Management History on Employee Attitudes and Turnover , 2007 .

[74]  P. Stone,et al.  Your office is where you are , 1985 .

[75]  Goo Hyeok Chung,et al.  Innovation Implementation as a Dynamic Equilibrium: Emergent Processes and Divergent Outcomes , 2018 .

[76]  Adegoke Oke,et al.  The Influence of Leadership on Innovation Processes and Activities , 2009 .

[77]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Computer Support for Group Work: Perceptions of the Usefulness of Support Scenarios and End-User Tools , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[78]  W. Bennis Theory and Method in Applying Behavioral Science to Planned Organizational Change , 1965 .

[79]  Lissa V. Young,et al.  Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change , 2012 .

[80]  A. Sohal Assessing AMT implementations: an empirical field study , 1996 .

[81]  O. Kwon,et al.  User acceptance of context-aware services: self-efficacy, user innovativeness and perceived sensitivity on contextual pressure , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[82]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[83]  Jeffrey S. Hornsby,et al.  Why implementing corporate innovation is so difficult , 2014 .

[84]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[85]  G. Ekvall,et al.  Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model , 1991 .

[86]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[87]  D. E. Krause Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation , 2004 .

[88]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  Made to Fit: How Practices Vary as They Diffuse , 2014 .

[89]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  Implementation research: state of the art and future directions , 2002 .

[90]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Who initiates and who implements? A multi-stage, multi-agent model of organizational innovation , 2011, Journal of Management & Organization.

[91]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors , 2000 .

[92]  Karen J. Jansen,et al.  Toward a Multidimensional Theory of Person-Environment Fit , 2006 .

[93]  E. Rogers,et al.  Innovations and Organizations , 1988 .

[94]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[95]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[96]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[97]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[99]  Katherine J. Klein,et al.  Innovation Implementation , 2005 .

[100]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Adaptation to Information Technology: A Holistic Nomological Network from Implementation to Job Outcomes , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[101]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Quality circles: After the honeymoon , 1987 .

[102]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2016 .

[103]  Joan Petersilia,et al.  Conditions That Permit Intensive Supervision Programs to Survive , 1990 .

[104]  Andrea D. Ellinger,et al.  Understanding support for innovation in a large‐scale change effort: The manager‐as‐instructor approach , 1999 .

[105]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Implementing routine and radical innovations , 1989 .

[106]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  The Role of Networks in Fundamental Organizational Change , 2003 .

[107]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[108]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[109]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations , 2005 .

[110]  M. West,et al.  The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation:a special issue introduction , 2004 .

[111]  W. J. Vrakking,et al.  The implementation game , 1995 .

[112]  John Paul Macduffie Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[113]  D. Trafimow A Theory of Attitudes, Subjective Norms, and Private Versus Collective Self-Concepts , 1999 .

[114]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[115]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Innovation implementation in the public sector: an integration of institutional and collective dynamics. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[116]  D. Cook,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[117]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[118]  Mathea Falco,et al.  A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. , 2003, Health education research.

[119]  Stephen A. Stumpf,et al.  Self-efficacy expectations and coping with career-related events , 1987 .

[120]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[121]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Work motivation: New directions in theory and research. , 1994 .

[122]  Theresa M. Welbourne,et al.  Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. , 1999 .

[123]  Richard A. Wolfe,et al.  Radical HRM innovation and competitive advantage: The Moneyball story , 2006 .

[124]  D. Vollrath,et al.  Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes , 1988 .

[125]  K. Law,et al.  High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective , 2007 .

[126]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[127]  B. Hesketh,et al.  Person–Environment Fit , 2015 .

[128]  Sue Abdinnour-Helm,et al.  Examining the Impact of Pre-Implementation Expectations on Post-Implementation Use of Enterprise Systems: A Longitudinal Study , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[129]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[130]  杨文秀,et al.  此处“personality”译法探析 , 2000 .

[131]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Successful Implementation of End-User Computing , 1987 .

[132]  Markus Baer Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations , 2012 .

[133]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[134]  N. Jimmieson,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Culture and Reshaping Capabilities on Change Implementation Success: The Mediating Role of Readiness for Change , 2005 .

[135]  Cataldo Ruta,et al.  The application of change management theory to HR portal implementation in subsidiaries of multinational corporations , 2005 .

[136]  A. Boonstra Information systems and organizational change , 2002 .

[137]  Dong-Sung Cho,et al.  Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation , 2011 .

[138]  B. Bass Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd ed. , 1990 .

[139]  Richard Adams,et al.  Perceptions of innovations: exploring and developing innovation classification , 2003 .

[140]  Jay A. Conger,et al.  Charismatic Leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness , 1988 .

[141]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  How Endogenous Motivations Influence User Intentions: Beyond the Dichotomy of Extrinsic and Intrinsic User Motivations , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[142]  Michael J. Smith,et al.  Implementing New Technology , 2004 .

[143]  N. Schillewaert,et al.  Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research , 2002 .

[144]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[145]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use , 2010, MIS Q..

[146]  Richard A. Wolfe,et al.  Human resource management innovations: Determinants of their adoption and implementation , 1995 .

[147]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Multiple Forms of Innovation Implementation: The Role of Innovation, Individuals, and the Implementation Context , 2013 .

[148]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[149]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[150]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective , 2009 .

[151]  David C Aron,et al.  Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: A case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[152]  James Martinez Leadership: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[153]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[154]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[155]  G. Yukl,et al.  An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership , 1999 .

[156]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  How do employees adapt to organizational change driven by cross-border M&As? A case in China , 2014 .

[157]  Urban Ljungquist Unbalanced Dynamic Capabilities as Obstacles of Organisational Efficiency: Implementation Issues in Innovative Technology Adoption , 2013 .

[158]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[159]  J. Stock,et al.  Adoption and implementation of technological innovations within long-term relationships , 2003 .

[160]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[161]  Chris Pullig,et al.  Salesforce automation systems: an exploratory examination of organizational factors associated with effective implementation and salesforce productivity , 2002 .

[162]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[163]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  User Acceptance of Agile Information Systems: A Model and Empirical Test , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[164]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Communication and Innovation Implementation , 1984 .

[165]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[166]  Michael Ahearne,et al.  A Longitudinal Cross-Level Model of Leader and Salesperson Influences on Sales Force Technology Use and Performance , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[167]  A. Somech,et al.  Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation , 2013 .

[168]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[169]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2003, MIS Q..

[170]  Mieneke W. H. Weenig,et al.  Communication Networks in the Diffusion of an Innovation in an Organization1 , 1999 .

[171]  Perspectives on organizational change: Exploring movement at the interface. , 1994 .

[172]  J. Barlow,et al.  Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: Experiences of ‘telecare’ , 2006 .

[173]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[174]  Achilles A. Armenakis,et al.  Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change , 2013 .

[175]  Guangping Wang,et al.  Effects of sales force market orientation on creativity, innovation implementation, and sales performance , 2015 .

[176]  Rangaraj Ramanujam,et al.  Why Does the Quality of Health Care Continue to Lag? Insights from Management Research. , 2009 .

[177]  Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Innovation and learning during implementation: a comparison of user and manufacturer innovations , 1993 .

[178]  Using Principles of Practice-Based Research to Teach Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work , 2014, Journal of evidence-based social work.

[179]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[180]  Linda Duxbury The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[181]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Management innovation , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[182]  Steven D. Caldwell,et al.  Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: a cross-level study. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[183]  G. Marwell,et al.  A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[184]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Identifying Sources of Reengineering Failures: A Study of the Behavioral Factors Contributing to Reengineering Risks , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[185]  D. Funder,et al.  Profiting from controversy. Lessons from the person-situation debate. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[186]  Jin Nam Choi Individual and Contextual Dynamics of Innovation-Use Behavior in Organizations , 2004 .