Effects of non-native dialects on spoken word recognition

The present study examined the premise that lexical information (top-down factors) interacts with phonetic detail (bottom-up, episodic traces) by assessing the impact of dialect variation and word frequency on spoken word recognition. Words were either spoken in the listeners’ native dialect (Australian English: AU), or in one of two non-native English dialects differing in phonetic similarity to Australian: South African (SA: more similar) and Jamaican Mesolect (JA: less similar). It was predicted that low-frequency English words spoken in non-native dialects, especially the less similar dialect, would require more information to be recognised due to systematic phonological and/or phonetic differences from native-dialect versions. A gating task revealed that more gates were required for JA than SA dialect words, with this effect even more pronounced for low than high-frequency words. This suggests that recognition of words is contingent upon both detailed phonetic properties within the mental lexicon, as evident in the effects of goodness of fit between native and non-native dialect pronunciations, and on lexical information.

[1]  James M Hillenbrand,et al.  Open source software for experiment design and control. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[3]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: Phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition , 2001 .

[4]  M. Pitt,et al.  Word length and lexical activation: longer is better. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction , 1987, Cognition.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect , 2005, Speech Commun..

[9]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[12]  C. Best A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .

[13]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? , 1998 .

[14]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[15]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[16]  John C. Wells,et al.  Accents of English , 1982 .

[17]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  H. Shu,et al.  Spoken word recognition in context: Evidence from Chinese ERP analyses , 2006, Brain and Language.