Realism in confidence judgements of performance based on implicit learning.

In two experiments we employed calibration methods to investigate the realism of participants' confidence ratings of their own classification performance based on knowledge acquired after training on an artificial grammar. In Experiment 1 participants showed good realism (but overconfidence) for grammatical strings but very poor realism for non-grammatical strings. Method of training (string repetition in writing or mere exposure) did not affect the realism. Furthermore, the participants underestimated their overall performance. In Experiment 2, using a more complex grammar and controlling for two types of associative chunk-strength, participants showed good realism (but still overconfidence) for both letter and symbol strings, irrespective of grammaticality. Together, these experiments show that implicit learning can give rise to knowledge products that are associated with fairly realistic meta-knowledge. It is argued that both the zero-correlation criterion and the guessing criterion are misplaced when ...

[1]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Anders Winman,et al.  Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation , 1996 .

[3]  Pär Anders Granhag,et al.  Realism in eyewitness confidence as a function of type of event witnessed and repeated recall , 1997 .

[4]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[5]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Implicit (and explicit) learning: acting adaptively without knowing the consequences. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Gideon Keren,et al.  Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: A calibration study , 1987 .

[7]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold , 1997 .

[8]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art , 1977 .

[9]  D. Berry.  How implicit is implicit learning , 1997 .

[10]  Zoltán Dienes,et al.  Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains? How implicit and how abstract? , 1997 .

[11]  G. Keren.  Calibration and probability judgements: Conceptual and methodological issues , 1991 .

[12]  Josef Perner,et al.  Implicit knowledge in people and connectionist networks , 1996 .

[13]  Z. Dienes,et al.  A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Viewing eyewitness research from a metacognitive perspective. , 1994 .

[15]  Ab McClelland,et al.  The calibration of subjective probabilities: Theories and models 1980-1993 , 1994 .

[16]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[17]  Gary Cantor,et al.  On the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Modes in the Learning of a Complex Rule Structure , 1980 .

[18]  P. Juslin,et al.  Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: a sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. , 1997, Psychological review.

[19]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation , 1978, Cognition.