New Programs for Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction

Prediction of protein tertiary structure remains an unsolved problem in molecular biology, but a solution to this problem is extremely important for protein engineering and rational drug design. Recent developments in motif recognition and side chain modeling present the prospect of nearly automatic model building for a large fraction of newly determined protein sequences. We review some of these new algorithms and present preliminary results of their application to the prediction of a structure for fasciclin III, a neural adhesion molecule from Drosophila.

[1]  N. Go,et al.  Ring Closure and Local Conformational Deformations of Chain Molecules , 1970 .

[2]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[3]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[4]  M. Karplus,et al.  An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure predictions. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  G. Rose,et al.  Loops in globular proteins: a novel category of secondary structure. , 1986, Science.

[6]  T. A. Jones,et al.  Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[7]  J. Moult,et al.  An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins by systematic search , 1986, Proteins.

[8]  A. Lesk,et al.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[9]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[10]  C. Levinthal,et al.  Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations , 1986, Proteins.

[11]  Y. Satow,et al.  Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin Fab McPC603. An X-ray diffraction study at 2.7 A. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  N. Patel,et al.  Characterization and cloning of fasciclin III: A glycoprotein expressed on a subset of neurons and axon pathways in Drosophila , 1987, Cell.

[13]  T. L. Blundell,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules , 1987, Nature.

[14]  C. Levinthal,et al.  Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ringlike structures , 1987, Biopolymers.

[15]  J. Ponder,et al.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  A. Lesk,et al.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  M. Karplus,et al.  Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling , 1987, Biopolymers.

[18]  J. Thornton,et al.  Analysis and prediction of the different types of β-turn in proteins , 1988 .

[19]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models , 1988, Proteins.

[20]  C. Goodman,et al.  Fasciclin III: A novel homophilic adhesion molecule in Drosophila , 1989, Cell.

[21]  C Sander,et al.  Polarity as a criterion in protein design. , 1989, Protein engineering.

[22]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Identification of protein folds: Matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures , 1990, Proteins.

[23]  F E Cohen,et al.  Novel method for the rapid evaluation of packing in protein structures. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  F E Cohen,et al.  Protein model structure evaluation using the solvation free energy of folding. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  K. Dill,et al.  Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  G. Casari,et al.  Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  N. Patel,et al.  Molecular genetics of neuronal recognition in Drosophila: evolution and function of immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[28]  M. Sippl Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  C. Sander,et al.  Database algorithm for generating protein backbone and side-chain co-ordinates from a C alpha trace application to model building and detection of co-ordinate errors. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Secondary structure‐based profiles: Use of structure‐conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities , 1991, Proteins.

[31]  G. Crippen Prediction of protein folding from amino acid sequence over discrete conformation spaces. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[32]  K. Sharp,et al.  Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons , 1991, Proteins.

[33]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Empirical solvation models can be used to differentiate native from near‐native conformations of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor , 1991, Proteins.

[34]  J. Greer,et al.  Comparative modeling of homologous proteins. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[35]  S F Altschul,et al.  Statistical methods and insights for protein and DNA sequences. , 1991, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[36]  M. Sippl,et al.  Detection of native‐like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three‐dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations , 1992, Proteins.

[37]  C. Sander,et al.  Fast and simple monte carlo algorithm for side chain optimization in proteins: Application to model building by homology , 1992, Proteins.

[38]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles , 1992, Nature.

[39]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Standard‐geometry chains fitted to X‐ray derived structures: Validation of the rigid‐geometry approximation. II. Systematic searches for short loops in proteins: Applications to bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A and human lysozyme , 1992 .

[40]  John P. Overington,et al.  Environment‐specific amino acid substitution tables: Tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  D. T. Jones,et al.  A new approach to protein fold recognition , 1992, Nature.

[42]  C. Chothia One thousand families for the molecular biologist , 1992, Nature.

[43]  G. Crippen,et al.  Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Johan Desmet,et al.  The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning , 1992, Nature.

[45]  F. Cohen,et al.  Taxonomy and conformational analysis of loops in proteins. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  C. Sander,et al.  Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  A. Godzik,et al.  Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  S. Bryant,et al.  An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif , 1993, Proteins.