Calibration, Projection, and Final Image Products of MESSENGER’s Mercury Dual Imaging System

We present an overview of the operations, calibration, geodetic control, photometric standardization, and processing of images from the Mercury Dual Imaging System (MDIS) acquired during the orbital phase of the MESSENGER spacecraft’s mission at Mercury (18 March 2011–30 April 2015). We also provide a summary of all of the MDIS products that are available in NASA’s Planetary Data System (PDS). Updates to the radiometric calibration included slight modification of the frame-transfer smear correction, updates to the flat fields of some wide-angle camera (WAC) filters, a new model for the temperature dependence of narrow-angle camera (NAC) and WAC sensitivity, and an empirical correction for temporal changes in WAC responsivity. Further, efforts to characterize scattered light in the WAC system are described, along with a mosaic-dependent correction for scattered light that was derived for two regional mosaics. Updates to the geometric calibration focused on the focal lengths and distortions of the NAC and all WAC filters, NAC–WAC alignment, and calibration of the MDIS pivot angle and base. Additionally, two control networks were derived so that the majority of MDIS images can be co-registered with sub-pixel accuracy; the larger of the two control networks was also used to create a global digital elevation model. Finally, we describe the image processing and photometric standardization parameters used in the creation of the MDIS advanced products in the PDS, which include seven large-scale mosaics, numerous targeted local mosaics, and a set of digital elevation models ranging in scale from local to global.

[1]  Richard F. Conde,et al.  The MESSENGER Spacecraft , 2007 .

[2]  Erick R. Malaret,et al.  The Mercury Dual Imaging System on the MESSENGER Spacecraft , 2007 .

[3]  B. Hapke A THEORETICAL PHOTOMETRIC FUNCTION FOR THE LUNAR SURFACE , 1963 .

[4]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy: 4. The extinction coefficient and the opposition effect , 1986 .

[5]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modernization of the Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers , 2004 .

[6]  Carolyn M. Ernst,et al.  Mercury’s global color mosaic: An update from MESSENGER’s orbital observations , 2015 .

[7]  Randolph L. Kirk,et al.  JIGSAW: THE ISIS3 BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT FOR EXTRATERRESTRIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2012 .

[8]  Danilo Schneider,et al.  Distortion correction of all-reflective unobscured optical-power zoom objective , 2010 .

[9]  Y. Shkuratov,et al.  Optical measurements of the Moon as a tool to study its surface , 2011 .

[10]  William E. McClintock,et al.  In-flight performance of MESSENGER's Mercury Dual Imaging System , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[11]  B. Hapke Theory of reflectance and emittance spectroscopy , 1993 .

[12]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  Characterizing and navigating small bodies with imaging data , 2006 .

[14]  Hari Nair,et al.  SciBox, an end-to-end automated science planning and commanding system , 2014 .

[15]  Scott L. Murchie,et al.  Application of multiple photometric models to disk-resolved measurements of Mercury’s surface: Insights into Mercury’s regolith characteristics , 2016 .

[16]  Mark S. Robinson,et al.  Preliminary Remediation of Scattered Light in NEAR MSI Images , 2000 .

[17]  S. Murchie,et al.  Extending MESSENGER's Mercury Dual Imager's Eight-Color Photometric Standardization to Cover all Eleven Filters. , 2017 .

[18]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy: 6. Effects of porosity , 2008 .

[19]  Mark S. Robinson,et al.  Inflight calibration of the NEAR multispectral imager: II. Results from Eros approach and orbit , 2002 .

[20]  Robert E. Gold,et al.  Inflight Calibration of the NEAR Multispectral Imager , 1999 .

[21]  C. Russell,et al.  Resolved photometry of Vesta reveals physical properties of crater regolith , 2013 .

[22]  Tom Drummond,et al.  Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[23]  James E. Harvey,et al.  Modeling physical optics phenomena by complex ray tracing , 2015 .

[24]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy , 1984 .

[25]  Alexander Stark,et al.  Toward high-resolution global topography of Mercury from MESSENGER orbital stereo imaging: A prototype model for the H6 (Kuiper) quadrangle , 2016, 1608.08487.

[26]  Bruce Hapke,et al.  Bidirectional Reflectance Spectroscopy: 5. The Coherent Backscatter Opposition Effect and Anisotropic Scattering , 2002 .

[27]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[28]  Karri Muinonen,et al.  Optimization Methods for Asteroid Lightcurve Inversion. II. The Complete Inverse Problem , 2001 .

[29]  Michael J. Elko,et al.  Multi-Spectral Imager on the Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous Mission , 1997 .