A joint deep learning model to recover information and reduce artifacts in missing-wedge sinograms for electron tomography and beyond

We present a joint model based on deep learning that is designed to inpaint the missing-wedge sinogram of electron tomography and reduce the residual artifacts in the reconstructed tomograms. Traditional methods, such as weighted back projection (WBP) and simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART), lack the ability to recover the unacquired project information as a result of the limited tilt range; consequently, the tomograms reconstructed using these methods are distorted and contaminated with the elongation, streaking, and ghost tail artifacts. To tackle this problem, we first design a sinogram filling model based on the use of Residual-in-Residual Dense Blocks in a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). Then, we use a U-net structured Generative Adversarial Network to reduce the residual artifacts. We build a two-step model to perform information recovery and artifacts removal in their respective suitable domain. Compared with the traditional methods, our method offers superior Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) and the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) to WBP and SART; even with a missing wedge of 45°, our method offers reconstructed images that closely resemble the ground truth with nearly no artifacts. In addition, our model has the advantage of not needing inputs from human operators or setting hyperparameters such as iteration steps and relaxation coefficient used in TV-based methods, which highly relies on human experience and parameter fine turning.

[1]  P. Midgley,et al.  3D electron microscopy in the physical sciences: the development of Z-contrast and EFTEM tomography. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[2]  Baodong Liu,et al.  Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique based on guided image filtering. , 2016, Optics express.

[3]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  MGH–USC Human Connectome Project datasets with ultra-high b-value diffusion MRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  Abdelwahhab Boudjelal,et al.  Improved Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique Algorithm for Positron-Emission Tomography Image Reconstruction via Minimizing the Fast Total Variation. , 2017, Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences.

[5]  Gregory Shakhnarovich,et al.  Deep Back-Projection Networks for Super-Resolution , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  Electron tomography based on a total variation minimization reconstruction technique , 2012 .

[7]  Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau,et al.  The relativistic discriminator: a key element missing from standard GAN , 2018, ICLR.

[8]  Jian Sun,et al.  Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[9]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[10]  Yu Qiao,et al.  ESRGAN: Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, ECCV Workshops.

[11]  Yun Fu,et al.  Residual Dense Network for Image Super-Resolution , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  S. Dwivedi,et al.  Obesity May Be Bad: Compressed Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2020 .

[13]  Jia Deng,et al.  A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR 2009.

[14]  A. Kak,et al.  Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.

[15]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[16]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[17]  Ming Jiang,et al.  Convergence of the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) , 2003, Conference Record of Thirty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat.No.01CH37256).

[18]  Kyoung Mu Lee,et al.  Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networks , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[19]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylization , 2016, ArXiv.

[20]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[21]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[22]  Christian Ledig,et al.  Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[23]  Yochai Blau,et al.  The Perception-Distortion Tradeoff , 2017, CVPR.

[24]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[25]  Djemel Ziou,et al.  Image Quality Metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[26]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[27]  Kaiming He,et al.  Group Normalization , 2018, ECCV.

[28]  Jian Yang,et al.  Image Super-Resolution via Deep Recursive Residual Network , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[29]  Chih-Yuan Yang,et al.  Learning a No-Reference Quality Metric for Single-Image Super-Resolution , 2016, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..