Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications

The growing complexity of challenges involved in scientific progress demands ever more frequent application of competencies and knowledge from different scientific fields. The present work analyzes the degree of collaboration among scientists from different disciplines to identify the most frequent “combinations of knowledge” in research activity. The methodology adopts an innovative bibliometric approach based on the disciplinary affiliation of publication coauthors. The field of observation includes all publications (167,179) indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded for the years 2004–2008, authored by all scientists in the hard sciences (43,223) at Italian universities (68). The analysis examines 205 research fields grouped in 9 disciplines. Identifying the fields with the highest potential of interdisciplinary collaboration is useful to inform research polices at the national and regional levels, as well as management strategies at the institutional level. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the backbone of science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[2]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[3]  G. Laudel.  What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .

[4]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Structures and Strategies of Interdisciplinary Science , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  J. Klein.  Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[6]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies , 2006 .

[9]  H. Etzkowitz.  Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[10]  J. Hoekman,et al.  The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Research Laboratory Architecture and the Structuring of Communications : R&D Management , 1975 .

[12]  María Bordons,et al.  Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas , 2001 .

[13]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research , 2011, Scientometrics.

[14]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators , 2001, Scientometrics.

[15]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[16]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity measures and network centralities as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in BionanoScience , 2007 .

[17]  A. Porter,et al.  How interdisciplinary is a given body of research , 2008 .

[18]  J. Klein,et al.  Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators , 2010 .

[19]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[21]  F. J. Rijnsoever,et al.  Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration , 2011 .

[22]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA , 2004 .

[23]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[24]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[25]  Wesley Shrum,et al.  The organization of scientific collaborations , 2002 .

[26]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[27]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[28]  M. Clark,et al.  Evaluating transdisciplinary science. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[29]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[30]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics , 2002, Scientometrics.

[31]  Toke Bjerregaard.  Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration , 2010 .

[32]  Cristiano Giuffrida,et al.  A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  Applying bibliometric mapping in a high level science policy context , 2009, Scientometrics.

[35]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems , 2004 .

[36]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[37]  Gregory Tassey,et al.  The functions of technology infrastructure in a competitive economy , 1991 .

[38]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[39]  G. Melin.  Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[40]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[41]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding , 2006, Scientometrics.

[42]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.