Silvicultural prescriptions for mixed-species forest stands. A European review and perspective

Compared with far-developed measures and methods for mono-specific forest stands, the silvicultural prescriptions for mixed-species stands are at their early beginning. However, they are essential for the well-conceived establishment, design, and control of mixed-species stands, currently promoted in many countries worldwide. Here, we review the state of the art and we further develop silvicultural prescriptions for mixed-species stands for steering of experiments, stand modeling, and silviculture. We review which aspects of tree species mixing are most relevant for management goal achievement. We found the maintenance of species diversity and structural heterogeneity for ecological purpose, stabilizing productivity, and social-economic performance as main objectives. We give an overview of quantitatively formulated silvicultural prescriptions for steering mixed-species stands for forest practice, long-term experiments, forest stand models. Compared with the sophisticated guidelines for mono-specific stands, prescriptions for mixed stand are often mainly qualitative and vague. Then, we introduce methodological approaches in development for steering mixture: measures for spatial and temporal separation, species-specific growing space requirements for crop trees, coefficients for equivalence and density modification, and basic relationships for steering tree number and area-based mixing proportions. Finally, we draw conclusions for further development of methodological approaches for silvicultural steering of experiments, implementation in stand simulators, and for silvicultural operations. We see the need for improving the quantitative spatially explicit rules based at tree or cohort level, for substantiating the knowledge on species-specific allometry, growing area, tree-to-tree distances, and position-dependent competition indices for steering tree removal. We discuss the prospects and limitations of establishing silvicultural prescriptions for mixed-species stands that inevitably will be more complicated than those for mono-specific stands, and we draw conclusions for next steps in science and practice.

[1]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Density regulation of mixed and mono-specific forest stands as a continuum: a new concept based on species-specific coefficients for density equivalence and density modification , 2019, Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research.

[2]  H. Mayer.  Waldbau : auf soziologisch-ökologischer Grundlage , 1977 .

[3]  T. A. Black,et al.  Changes in net ecosystem productivity with forest age following clearcutting of a coastal Douglas-fir forest: testing a mathematical model with eddy covariance measurements along a forest chronosequence. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[4]  N. Fahlvik,et al.  Effects of precommercial thinning strategies on stand structure and growth in a mixed even-aged stand of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch in southern Sweden , 2015 .

[5]  M. Pardos,et al.  Interannual variability in competitive effects in mixed and monospecific forests of Mediterranean stone pine , 2015 .

[6]  J. Vanclay,et al.  Spatially explicit competition in a mixed planting of Araucaria cunninghamii and Flindersia brayleyana , 2013, Annals of Forest Science.

[7]  Alain Leduc,et al.  Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: Stand- and forest-level considerations , 1999 .

[8]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics , 1999 .

[9]  W. Schädelin.  Die Auslesedurchforstung als Erziehungsbetrieb höchster Wertleistung , 1942 .

[10]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Aboveground and belowground interactions in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii , 2000 .

[11]  M. Heym,et al.  Growth and yield of mixed versus pure stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[12]  R. Graham,et al.  Application of free selection in mixed forests of the inland northwestern United States , 2005 .

[13]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  A Model for Individual Tree Development Based on Physiological Processes , 2002 .

[14]  R. LarocqueGuy,et al.  Competition theory — science and application in mixed forest stands: review of experimental and modelling methods and suggestions for future research , 2013 .

[15]  Mark J. Ducey,et al.  A stand density index for complex mixed species forests in the northeastern United States , 2010 .

[16]  Markku Kanninen,et al.  Performance of forest plantations in small and medium-sized farms in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica , 2003 .

[17]  Giulia Attocchi,et al.  Silviculture of oak for high-quality wood production , 2015 .

[18]  M. Löf,et al.  The Development of Silvicultural Guidelines for Creating Mixed Forests , 2018 .

[19]  T. Zlatanov,et al.  EuMIXFOR empirical forest mensuration and ring width data from pure and mixed stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) through Europe , 2017, Annals of Forest Science.

[20]  Anssi Ahtikoski,et al.  Applying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effects of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production , 2005 .

[21]  A. Cowie,et al.  Nutrient cycling in a mixed-species plantation of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii , 2005 .

[22]  Juan A. Blanco,et al.  Increased complementarity in water‐limited environments in Scots pine and European beech mixtures under climate change , 2017 .

[23]  M. Ducey,et al.  Climate and species functional traits influence maximum live tree stocking in the Lake States, USA , 2017 .

[24]  J. Vanclay.  Experiment designs to evaluate inter- and intra-specific interactions in mixed plantings of forest trees , 2006 .

[25]  Robert O. Curtis,et al.  Yield tables for managed stands of coast Douglas-fir. , 1981 .

[26]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  Survival of Norway spruce remains higher in mixed stands under a dryer and warmer climate , 2015, Global change biology.

[27]  G. Kraft.  Beiträge zur Lehre von den Durchforstungen, Schlagstellungen und Lichtungshieben , 1884 .

[28]  Anna Barbati,et al.  Knowledge gaps about mixed forests: What do European forest managers want to know and what answers can science provide? , 2018 .

[29]  Karin Öhman,et al.  Optimizing spatial habitat suitability and timber revenue in long-term forest planning , 2011 .

[30]  Marek Fabrika,et al.  Algorithms and software solution of thinning models for SIBYLA growth simulator , 2018 .

[31]  M. Ducey,et al.  Climate influences on the maximum size-density relationship in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands , 2017 .

[32]  J. G. Molina.  Tipificación de las masas mixtas de pino y rebollo en el centro de España y desarrollo de conceptos para su tratamiento selvícola , 1996 .

[33]  H. Pretzsch.  Forest Dynamics, Growth, and Yield , 2010 .

[34]  L. Valsta,et al.  Productivity and economics of mixed two-storied spruce and birch stands in Southern Finland simulated with empirical models , 2001 .

[35]  Filippo Bussotti,et al.  Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests , 2016, Science.

[36]  G. Kerr.  The effect of heavy or ‘free growth’ thinning on oak (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) , 1996 .

[37]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures. Methodological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony , 1997 .

[38]  P. Burschel,et al.  Grundriß des Waldbaus , 1997 .

[39]  H. Sterba,et al.  A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands , 2014 .

[40]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[41]  Giorgio Matteucci,et al.  A process-based model to simulate growth in forests with complex structure: Evaluation and use of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model in a deciduous forest in Central Italy , 2014 .

[42]  D. Forrester.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: From pattern to process , 2014 .

[43]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation , 2002 .

[44]  Rüdiger Grote,et al.  Challenges for evaluating process-based models of gas exchange at forest sites with fetches of various species , 2011 .

[45]  H. Pretzsch.  The Effect of Tree Crown Allometry on Community Dynamics in Mixed-Species Stands versus Monocultures. A Review and Perspectives for Modeling and Silvicultural Regulation , 2019, Forests.

[46]  J. Landsberg,et al.  PHYSIOLOGY IN FOREST MODELS: HISTORY AND THE FUTURE , 2003 .

[47]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Dynamics, Silviculture and Management of Mixed Forests , 2018, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[48]  G. Mitscherlich.  Form und Wachstum von Baum und Bestand , 1970 .

[49]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Modelling Mixed-Species Forest Stands , 2017 .

[50]  Eric Renshaw,et al.  Analysis of forest thinning strategies through the development of space–time growth–interaction simulation models , 2009 .

[51]  A. Huth,et al.  Gap models and their individual-based relatives in the assessment of the consequences of global change , 2018 .

[52]  E. Zenner,et al.  Toward managing mixed-species stands: from parametrization to prescription , 2017, Forest Ecosystems.

[53]  Thomas Knoke,et al.  Growth performance, windthrow, and insects: meta-analyses of parameters influencing performance of mixed-species stands in boreal and northern temperate biomes , 2011 .

[54]  H. Bugmann.  A Review of Forest Gap Models , 2001 .

[55]  Jingjing Liang,et al.  Matrix Model of Forest Dynamics: An Overview and Outlook , 2013 .

[56]  T. Pukkala,et al.  A spatial yield model for optimizing the thinning regime of mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies , 1998 .

[57]  E. Valinger,et al.  Spruce and birch growth in pure and mixed stands in Sweden , 2014 .

[58]  Pelz.  Estimating individual tree growth with tree polygons , 1978 .

[59]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[60]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Tree species mixing can increase maximum stand density , 2016 .

[61]  C. Nowak.  Wood volume increment in thinned, 50- to 55-year-old, mixed-species Allegheny hardwoods , 1996 .

[62]  H. Jactel,et al.  Ecological stability of mixed-species forests , 2017 .

[63]  A. Felton,et al.  Replacing coniferous monocultures with mixed-species production stands: an assessment of the potential benefits for forest biodiversity in northern Europe , 2010 .

[64]  Arne Pommerening,et al.  Approaches to quantifying forest structures , 2002 .

[65]  J. A. Moore,et al.  A New Index Representing Individual Tree Competitive Status , 1973 .

[66]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[67]  A. Cowie,et al.  Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: A review , 2006 .

[68]  M. Kelty.  Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands , 1992 .

[69]  T. Pukkala.  Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. , 2009 .

[70]  T. Knoke,et al.  Assessing transformation scenarios from pure Norway spruce to mixed uneven-aged forests in mountain areas , 2020, European Journal of Forest Research.

[71]  John A. Helms,et al.  The Dictionary of Forestry , 1998 .

[72]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Modelling approaches for mixed forests dynamics prognosis. Research gaps and opportunities , 2019, Forest Systems.

[73]  E. Schulze,et al.  Forest Diversity and Function , 2005 .

[74]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Long-term stand dynamics of managed spruce–fir–beech mountain forests in Central Europe: structure, productivity and regeneration success , 2015 .

[75]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Height growth-related competitiveness of oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.) under climate change in Central Europe. Is silvicultural assistance still required in mixed-species stands? , 2021 .

[76]  Jette Bredahl Jacobsen,et al.  A Danish example of optimal thinning strategies in mixed-species forest under changing growth conditions caused by climate change , 2003 .

[77]  T. Seifert,et al.  Modelling above and below ground carbon dynamics in a mixed beech and spruce stand influenced by climate , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[78]  J. Vanclay,et al.  Mixed-species plantations: Prospects and challenges , 2006 .

[79]  M. Ducey,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Relative Density in Mixed-Species Stands of the Northeastern United States , 2010 .

[80]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  A non-stochastic portfolio model for optimizing the transformation of an even-aged forest stand to continuous cover forestry when information about return fluctuation is incomplete , 2017, Annals of Forest Science.

[81]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Growth–density relationship in mixed stands – Results from long-term experimental plots , 2021, Forest Ecology and Management.

[82]  J. Schütz.  Silvicultural tools to develop irregular and diverse forest structures , 2002 .

[83]  J. Diaci,et al.  Twenty-first century forestry: integrating ecologically based, uneven-aged silviculture with increased demands on forests , 2011 .

[84]  E. Hochbichler.  Methods of oak silviculture in Austria , 1993 .

[85]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  A method for predicting tree dimensions in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands , 1994 .

[86]  M. Amoroso,et al.  Comparing productivity of pure and mixed Douglas-fir and western hemlock plantations in the Pacific Northwest , 2006 .

[87]  Ian R. Cameron,et al.  Plot designs for the analysis of species interactions in , 2016 .

[88]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Representation of species mixing in forest growth models. A review and perspective , 2015 .

[89]  F. Bravo,et al.  Thinning enhances the species-specific radial increment response to drought in Mediterranean pine-oak stands , 2017 .

[90]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures , 2014 .

[91]  J. Repola,et al.  The effects of species mixture on the growth and yield of mid-rotation mixed stands of Scots pine and silver birch , 2011 .

[92]  E. Assmann,et al.  The Principles of Forest Yield Study: Studies in the Organic Production, Structure, Increment and Yield of Forest Stands , 2013 .

[93]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Mixed-Species Forests , 2017, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[94]  F. Franz.  Zur Behandlung und Wuchsleistung der Kiefer , 1983, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt.

[95]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[96]  M. Penner.  Yield prediction for mixed species stands in boreal Ontario , 2008 .

[97]  G. Hemery,et al.  Applications of the crown diameter–stem diameter relationship for different species of broadleaved trees , 2005 .

[98]  Andreas Huth,et al.  The effects of tree species grouping in tropical rainforest modelling: Simulations with the individual-based model Formind , 1998 .

[99]  Systematic Experimental Designs for Mixed Species Plantings , 2001 .

[100]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Species Mixing Regulation with Respect to Forest Ecosystem Service Provision , 2018, Forests.

[101]  T. Snäll,et al.  How Well Do Stakeholder-Defined Forest Management Scenarios Balance Economic and Ecological Forest Values? , 2020 .

[102]  R. Mosandl,et al.  Development of oaks (Quercus petraea [MATT.] Liebl.) emerged from bird-dispersed seeds under old-growth pine (Pinus silvestris L.) stands , 1998 .

[103]  中村 賢太郎.  ○Ertragskundliche und waldbauliche Grundlagen der Forstwirtschaft.(林業の收獲論および造林上の原理)Das Hauptergebnis der 70 jahrigen Arbeiten der(ehem.)Preussischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt, WIEDEMANN, Eilhard, 346 S., 1951. , 1952 .

[104]  Marina Segura,et al.  Review: Decision support systems for forest management: A comparative analysis and assessment , 2014 .

[105]  M. Ducey,et al.  Maximum stand density strongly depends on species-specific wood stability, shade and drought tolerance , 2018 .

[106]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Mixed stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) can be more productive than monocultures. Evidence from over 100 years of observation of long-term experiments , 2014 .

[107]  Growth and form of Quercus robur and Fraxinus excelsior respond distinctly different to initial growing space: results from 24-year-old Nelder experiments , 2013, Journal of Forestry Research.

[108]  Ralph D. Nyland,et al.  Silviculture: Concepts and Applications , 1996 .

[109]  E. Assmann,et al.  Vorläufige Fichten-Ertragstafel für Bayern , 2005, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt.

[110]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  The Heureka Forestry Decision Support System: An Overview , 2011, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[111]  L. McCook,et al.  Understanding ecological community succession: Causal models and theories, a review , 2004, Vegetatio.

[112]  M. Zasada,et al.  Productivity of mixed versus pure stands of oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along an ecological gradient , 2013, European Journal of Forest Research.

[113]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives , 2014 .

[114]  B. Brzeziecki,et al.  A demographic equilibrium approach to stocking control in mixed, multiaged stands in Bialowieża Forest, northeast Poland , 2021 .

[115]  Francisco Gutiérrez Rodríguez,et al.  A web-based application to simulate alternatives for sustainable forest management: SIMANFOR , 2012 .

[116]  Daniel Piotto,et al.  A meta-analysis comparing tree growth in monocultures and mixed plantations , 2008 .

[117]  Emmanuel S. Gritti,et al.  Positive biodiversity–productivity relationships in forests: climate matters , 2018, Biology Letters.

[118]  H. Erickson,et al.  Tree growth at stand and individual scales in two dual-species mixture experiments in southern Washington State, USA , 2009 .

[119]  J. Vanclay,et al.  Growth and Species Interactions of Eucalyptus pellita in a Mixed and Monoculture Plantation in the H , 2006 .

[120]  I. Bella,et al.  A New Competition Model for Individual Trees , 1971 .

[121]  Peter Annighöfer,et al.  How management intensity and neighborhood composition affect the structure of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees , 2017, Trees.

[122]  F. Bravo,et al.  Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe , 2019, European Journal of Forest Research.