Assessment of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) – vehicle accident hotspots with respect to the location of ‘trees outside forest' along roadsides

Abstract Animal-vehicle collisions (AVCs) pose a serious threat to human and animal welfare, and result in increasing costs for society. Mitigation efforts have been in the focus of research for decades but have revealed only few generalities on where and why AVCs occur. Uncertainty therefore remains on how to make decisions regarding nature conservation, wildlife and transportation management. In our study, we used GPS data on almost 1000 AVCs between October 2014 and October 2016 involving roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in the administrative district of Gottingen, Germany, to identify accident hotspots based on Kernel Density analysis. We then used information from a mapping campaign of trees outside forests (TOF), including hedges, bushes, groves, isolated trees and other non-forest vegetation to investigate whether TOF abundance is larger near accident hotspots when compared to areas showing no hotspots (assumed as reference area). We found that near hotspots, TOF are significantly more abundant than in the remaining reference area. We conclude that future transportation management should consider TOF management as a possible indicator for AVCs.

[1]  T. Fulbright,et al.  White-tailed deer use of clearings relative to forage availability , 2000 .

[2]  Anthony P. Clevenger,et al.  Large animal-vehicle collisions in the Central Canadian Rocky Mountains: patterns and characteristics , 2003 .

[3]  John Hogland,et al.  Land-Use Pattern, Urbanization, and Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Alabama , 2007 .

[4]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Kernel density estimation and hotspot mapping: examining the influence of interpolation method, grid cell size, and bandwidth on crime forecasting , 2014 .

[5]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  A kernel density estimation method for networks, its computational method and a GIS‐based tool , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Roy V. Rea,et al.  Modifying roadside vegetation management practices to reduce vehicular collisions with moose Alces alces , 2003, Wildlife Biology.

[7]  R. Jensen,et al.  The spatial ecology of deer–vehicle collisions , 2009 .

[8]  J. Bailey,et al.  Distribution of Mule Deer and Elk in Relation to Roads , 1979 .

[9]  M. Boyce,et al.  Predicting deer-vehicle collisions in an urban area. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  A. Seiler Predicting locations of moose–vehicle collisions in Sweden , 2005 .

[11]  P. Tappe,et al.  County-Level Factors Contributing to Deer–Vehicle Collisions in Arkansas , 2007 .

[12]  R. J. Putmam Deer and Road Traffic Accidents: Options for Management , 1997 .

[13]  Leslie A. Hansen,et al.  ANIMAL-RELATED VEHICLE ACCIDENTS AT THE LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY, NEW MEXICO , 2004 .

[14]  Konstantina Gkritza,et al.  Deer-vehicle collisions, deer density, and land use in Iowa's urban deer herd management zones. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Alan D. Woolf,et al.  Site and landscape conditions at white-tailed deer/vehicle collision locations in Illinois , 1999 .

[16]  Richard Andrášik,et al.  The KDE+ software: a tool for effective identification and ranking of animal-vehicle collision hotspots along networks , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Context‐dependent effects on spatial variation in deer‐vehicle collisions , 2015 .

[18]  G. A. Feldhamer,et al.  Effects of interstate highway fencing on white-tailed deer activity , 1986 .

[19]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  Temporal patterns of deer-vehicle collisions consistent with deer activity pattern and density increase but not general accident risk. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  S. Petit,et al.  Trees outside forests , 2005 .

[21]  M. Sjölund Road and landscape features affecting the aggregation of ungulate vehicle collisions in southern Sweden , 2016 .

[22]  Z. Keken,et al.  Effectiveness and costs of odor repellents in wildlife–vehicle collisions: A case study in Central Bohemia, Czech Republic , 2015 .

[23]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  Large-Scale Model-Based Assessment of Deer-Vehicle Collision Risk , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Francisco Suárez,et al.  Can we mitigate animal–vehicle accidents using predictive models? , 2004 .

[25]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[26]  H Summala,et al.  Deer-vehicle crashes: extensive peak at 1 hour after sunset. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  S. Saïd,et al.  The Influence of Landscape Structure on Female Roe Deer Home-range Size , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  R. Allen,et al.  Deer-Car Accidents in Southern Michigan , 1976 .

[29]  E. Hazebroek,et al.  Ungulate Traffic Collisions in Europe , 1996 .

[30]  F. Leisch,et al.  A review on the temporal pattern of deer-vehicle accidents: impact of seasonal, diurnal and lunar effects in cervids. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Andreas Seiler,et al.  Trends and spatial patterns in ungulate-vehicle collisions in Sweden , 2004, Wildlife Biology.

[32]  Michael W. Hubbard,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR ASSESSING THE STATUS OF CURRENT METHODS OF REDUCING DEER-VEHICLE COLLISIONS , 1998 .

[33]  Laura A. Romin,et al.  Deer-Vehicle Collisions: Nationwide Status of State Monitoring Activities and Efforts , 1996 .

[34]  Michael W. Hubbard,et al.  Factors influencing the location of deer-vehicle accidents in Iowa. , 2000 .