Clinical Decision Support Systems (cdsss) Have Been Hailed for Their Potential to Reduce Medical Errors Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine

BACKGROUND The use of clinical decision support systems to facilitate the practice of evidence-based medicine promises to substantially improve health care quality. OBJECTIVE To describe, on the basis of the proceedings of the Evidence and Decision Support track at the 2000 AMIA Spring Symposium, the research and policy challenges for capturing research and practice-based evidence in machine-interpretable repositories, and to present recommendations for accelerating the development and adoption of clinical decision support systems for evidence-based medicine. RESULTS The recommendations fall into five broad areas--capture literature-based and practice-based evidence in machine--interpretable knowledge bases; develop maintainable technical and methodological foundations for computer-based decision support; evaluate the clinical effects and costs of clinical decision support systems and the ways clinical decision support systems affect and are affected by professional and organizational practices; identify and disseminate best practices for work flow-sensitive implementations of clinical decision support systems; and establish public policies that provide incentives for implementing clinical decision support systems to improve health care quality. CONCLUSIONS Although the promise of clinical decision support system-facilitated evidence-based medicine is strong, substantial work remains to be done to realize the potential benefits.

[1]  S. Schor,et al.  Statistical evaluation of medical journal manuscripts. , 1966, JAMA.

[2]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Clinical research in general medical journals: a 30-year perspective. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A L Greer,et al.  The State of the Art Versus the State of the Science: The Diffusion of New Medical Technologies into Practice , 1988, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  J W Williamson,et al.  Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Where's the meat in clinical journals? , 1993, ACP Journal Club.

[6]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  A plea for controlled trials in medical informatics , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Reed M. Gardner,et al.  White Paper: Designing Medical Informatics Research and Library-Resource Projects to Increase What Is Learned , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  D. Sackett,et al.  Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. A-Team, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine. , 1995, Lancet.

[9]  D B Matchar,et al.  US national survey of physician practices for the secondary and tertiary prevention of ischemic stroke. Design, service availability, and common practices. , 1995, Stroke.

[10]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. , 1995, Controlled clinical trials.

[11]  H S Sacks,et al.  Meta-analysis: an update. , 1996, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[12]  William DuMouchel,et al.  A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[13]  P. Nutting,et al.  Practice-based research networks: building the infrastructure of primary care research. , 1996, The Journal of family practice.

[14]  J. Chikwe Evidence based general practice , 1996, BMJ.

[15]  Joyce A. Mitchell,et al.  The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. , 1996, Archives of family medicine.

[16]  J G Anderson,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Health Care Information Systems , 1997, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[17]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics , 1997, Computers and Medicine.

[18]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[19]  A. John Orzano,et al.  Practice Patterns of Family Physicians in Practice-Based Research Networks: A Report From ASPN , 1999, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[20]  B. Haynes,et al.  Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? , 1999, BMJ.

[21]  M. Mayo-Smith,et al.  Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. , 1999, JAMA.

[22]  B. Haynes,et al.  Refining the indications for carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: A systematic review. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  Alex Jadad,et al.  The Internet and evidence-based decision-making: a needed synergy for efficient knowledge management in health care , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[24]  P. Lavori,et al.  Electronic Trial Banks: A Complementary Method for Reporting Randomized Trials , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  J M Teich,et al.  Clinical decision support systems come of age. , 2000, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[26]  K. Asplund,et al.  Randomized controlled trials and consensus as a basis for interventions in internal medicine , 2000, Journal of internal medicine.

[27]  C van Weel,et al.  Family practice research networks. Experiences from 3 countries. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[28]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 2000, Revista espanola de salud publica.

[29]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  How Unexpected Events Produce An Escalation Of Cognitive And Coordinative Demands , 2001 .

[30]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  White Paper: Consumer Informatics Supporting Patients as Co-Producers of Quality , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  H. Meldrum,et al.  Appropriate Use of Carotid Endarterectomy , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.