Neck range of motion measurements using a new three-dimensional motion analysis system: validity and repeatability

PurposeNeck movement is important for many activities of daily living (ADL). Neck disorders, such as cervical spondylosis and whiplash can limit neck movement and ADL. The cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been recently used to measure neck range of motion (ROM); however, this measurement includes trunk motion, and therefore does not represent a pure neck ROM measurement. The authors aimed to develop a new method to establish pure neck ROM measurements during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation using a three-dimensional motion analysis system, VICON.MethodsTwelve healthy participants were recruited and neck ROMs during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation were measured using VICON and the CROM device. Test–retest repeatability was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Validity between two measurements was evaluated using a determination coefficient and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.ResultsICCs of neck ROM measured using VICON and the CROM device were all at substantial or almost perfect levels [VICON: ICC(1,2) = 0.786–0.962, the CROM device: ICC(1,2) = 0.736–0.950]. Both SEMs and MDCs were low in all measurement directions (VICON: SEM = 1.3°–4.5°, MDC = 3.6°–12.5°; the CROM device: SEM = 2.2°–3.9°, MDC = 6.1°–10.7°). Determination coefficients (R2s) and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (rs) between the two measurement methods were high (R2 = 0.607–0.745, r = 0.779–0.863).ConclusionsVICON is a useful system to measure neck ROMs and evaluate the efficacy of interventions, such as surgery or physiotherapeutic exercise.

[1]  J. Côté,et al.  Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. , 2010, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[2]  C. Bombardier,et al.  A taxonomy for responsiveness. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  T. Jensen,et al.  Handicap after acute whiplash injury , 2001, Neurology.

[4]  A. Mannion,et al.  Range of global motion of the cervical spine: intraindividual reliability and the influence of measurement device , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[6]  A. Nordwall,et al.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  H. Corriveau,et al.  Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. , 2006, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[8]  J Dvorak,et al.  Age and Gender Related Normal Motion of the Cervical Spine , 1992, Spine.

[9]  T. R. Garrett,et al.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[10]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. , 2012, Anesthesiology.

[11]  E. Saitoh,et al.  What Is the Chin-down Posture? A Questionnaire Survey of Speech Language Pathologists in Japan and the United States , 2007, Dysphagia.

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[13]  Y. Yukawa,et al.  Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion After Laminoplasty: Radiographical Data From More Than 500 Cases With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and a Review of the Literature , 2012, Spine.

[14]  M. Orendurff,et al.  The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  M. Sumitani,et al.  Novel 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis Method for Measuring the Lumbar Spine Range of Motion: Repeatability and Reliability Compared With an Electrogoniometer , 2013, Spine.

[16]  E. Gutierrez-Farewik,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of two common methods to measure center of mass displacement in three dimensions during gait. , 2006, Human movement science.

[17]  J. Kenardy,et al.  Characterization of Acute Whiplash-Associated Disorders , 2004, Spine.

[18]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three‐dimensional investigation in healthy young adults , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  Skowlund Hv,et al.  Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a bubble goniometer. , 1959 .

[20]  Michael John Haynes,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of a new, protractor-based neck goniometer. , 2002, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[21]  S. Bennett,et al.  Active Range of Motion Utilized in the Cervical Spine to Perform Daily Functional Tasks , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[22]  Adrian Lindsay Morphett,et al.  The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study. , 2003, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[23]  Barbara Cagnie,et al.  Reliability and normative database of the Zebris cervical range-of-motion system in healthy controls with preliminary validation in a group of patients with neck pain. , 2007, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[24]  J. Grauer,et al.  Soft and Rigid Collars Provide Similar Restriction in Cervical Range of Motion During Fifteen Activities of Daily Living , 2010, Spine.

[25]  P. Dijkstra,et al.  Interobserver reliability of neck-mobility measurement by means of the flock-of-birds electromagnetic tracking system. , 2005, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[26]  M. Magnusson,et al.  Zebris Versus Myrin: A Comparative Study Between a Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Movement Analysis and an Inclinometer/Compass Method: Intradevice Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Intertester Comparison, Intratester Reliability, and Intraindividual Variability , 2003, Spine.

[27]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[28]  Nathaniel R. Ordway,et al.  Cervical Sagittal Range‐of‐Motion Analysis Using Three Methods: Cervical Range‐of‐Motion Device, 3Space, and Radiography , 1997, Spine.

[29]  K A Kuhlman,et al.  Cervical range of motion in the elderly. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  M. Dow,et al.  Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a bubble goniometer. , 1959, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  J. Grauer,et al.  Normal Functional Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine During 15 Activities of Daily Living , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[32]  Michel Tousignant,et al.  Validity Study for the Cervical Range of Motion Device Used for Lateral Flexion in Patients With Neck Pain , 2002, Spine.

[33]  Masashi Miyazaki,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of the Relationship Between the Grade of Disc Degeneration and Motion Unit of the Cervical Spine , 2008, Spine.

[34]  M. Tousignant,et al.  Criterion Validity of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer for Cervical Flexion and Extension , 2000, Spine.

[35]  Wen-Lan Wu,et al.  Three-dimensional characteristics of neck movements in subjects with mechanical neck disorder. , 2012, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

[36]  M. Williams,et al.  A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion. , 2010, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[37]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Kinematics of the Cervical Spine During Head Rotation in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis , 2011, Spine.