Agricultural non-CO2 emission reduction potential in the context of the 1.5 °C target

Agricultural methane and nitrous oxide emissions represent around 10–12% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions and have a key role to play in achieving a 1.5 °C (above pre-industrial) climate stabilization target. Using a multi-model assessment approach, we quantify the potential contribution of agriculture to the 1.5 °C target and decompose the mitigation potential by emission source, region and mitigation mechanism. The results show that the livestock sector will be vital to achieve emission reductions consistent with the 1.5 °C target mainly through emission-reducing technologies or structural changes. Agriculture may contribute emission reductions of 0.8–1.4 Gt of CO2-equivalent (CO2e) yr−1 at just US$20 per tCO2e in 2050. Combined with dietary changes, emission reductions can be increased to 1.7–1.8 GtCO2e yr−1. At carbon prices compatible with the 1.5 °C target, agriculture could even provide average emission savings of 3.9 GtCO2e yr−1 in 2050, which represents around 8% of current GHG emissions.Agricultural CH4 and N2O emissions represent around 11% of total anthropogenic GHGs. Here agriculture mitigation potentials are quantified, in the context of the 1.5 °C target, and decomposed by emission source, region and mitigation mechanism.

[1]  T. Hertel.  Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications , 1999 .

[2]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation , 2018 .

[3]  G. Luderer,et al.  Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C , 2015 .

[4]  P. Gerber,et al.  The power and pain of market-based carbon policies: a global application to greenhouse gases from ruminant livestock production , 2018, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[5]  Adrian Leip,et al.  Evaluation of the Livestock Sector's Contribution to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Phase 1 (GGELS) , 2009 .

[6]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models , 2014 .

[7]  P. Ciais,et al.  How to spend a dwindling greenhouse gas budget , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[8]  N. Mueller,et al.  Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment , 2014, Science.

[9]  Structural change as a key component for agricultural non-CO2 mitigation efforts , 2018, Nature Communications.

[10]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[11]  Mykola Gusti,et al.  An algorithm for simulation of forest management decisions in the global forest model , 2010 .

[12]  David B Lobell,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  S. Frolking,et al.  Impacts of land use, restoration, and climate change on tropical peat carbon stocks in the twenty-first century: implications for climate mitigation , 2016, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[14]  H. Lotze-Campen,et al.  Afforestation to mitigate climate change: impacts on food prices under consideration of albedo effects , 2016 .

[15]  Torbjörn Jansson,et al.  Major challenges of integrating agriculture into climate change mitigation policy frameworks , 2017, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[16]  H. Lotze-Campen,et al.  Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production , 2010 .

[17]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  A Global Forest Growing Stock, Biomass and Carbon Map Based on FAO Statistics , 2008 .

[18]  Jo Smith,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Jessica Strefler,et al.  Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios , 2015 .

[20]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C , 2017 .

[21]  Emanuele Ferrari,et al.  Scenar 2030 - Pathways for the European agriculture and food sector beyond 2020 , 2017 .

[22]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[23]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Carbon budgets and energy transition pathways , 2016 .

[24]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases , 2007 .

[25]  H. Griffiths,et al.  The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture , 2016 .

[26]  K. Smith,et al.  Changing views of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soil: key controlling processes and assessment at different spatial scales , 2017 .

[27]  John R Porter,et al.  Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970–2050 , 2016, Global change biology.

[28]  Thomas W. Hertel,et al.  Why a Global Carbon Policy Could Have a Dramatic Impact on the Pattern of the Worldwide Livestock Production , 2011 .

[29]  Alessandro Flammini,et al.  The Contribution of Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use activities to Global Warming, 1990–2012 , 2015, Global change biology.

[30]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[31]  S. Robinson,et al.  Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities , 2017 .

[32]  H. Haberl,et al.  Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass , 2017, Nature.

[33]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Consequence of climate mitigation on the risk of hunger. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0 : Model description and policy applications , 2014 .

[35]  P. Kyle,et al.  Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways , 2017 .

[36]  Thomas W. Hertel,et al.  Global Trade Analysis , 1996 .

[37]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C , 2016, Nature.

[38]  Stefan Frank,et al.  Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? , 2017 .

[39]  H. Witzke,et al.  Does the current trade liberalization agenda contribute to greenhouse gas emission mitigation in agriculture , 2018 .

[40]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Climate benefits of changing diet , 2009 .

[41]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[42]  A. Leip,et al.  An economic assessment of GHG mitigation policy options for EU agriculture (EcAMPA 2) , 2016 .

[43]  E. Schmid,et al.  Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[45]  S. Rose,et al.  The Opportunity Cost of Land Use and the Global Potential for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture and Forestry , 2006, GTAP Working Paper.

[46]  M. Strubegger,et al.  The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[47]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  A roadmap for rapid decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[48]  Pete Smith,et al.  The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture , 2013 .

[49]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Pete Smith.  Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies , 2016, Global change biology.

[51]  Pete Smith,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector , 2016 .

[52]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Why the right climate target was agreed in Paris , 2016 .

[53]  E. Schmid,et al.  Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  S. Ogle,et al.  Global mitigation potential and costs of reducing agricultural non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions through 2030 , 2015 .

[55]  A. Tabeau,et al.  Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agricultural production and land use , 2011 .

[56]  Birgit Meade,et al.  International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns: An Update Using 2005 International Comparison Program Data , 2011 .

[57]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation , 2014 .

[58]  Anne Mottet,et al.  Marginal costs of abating greenhouse gases in the global ruminant livestock sector , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[59]  Petr Havlik,et al.  Comparing impacts of climate change and mitigation on global agriculture by 2050 , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[60]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[61]  S. D. Cara,et al.  How costly is mitigation of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture?: A meta-analysis , 2010 .

[62]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Betting on negative emissions , 2014 .

[63]  O. Edelenbosch,et al.  Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[64]  M. Herold,et al.  Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target , 2016, Global change biology.

[65]  B. Eickhout,et al.  The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe , 2006 .

[66]  T. Stocker,et al.  SBSTA-IPCC Special Event Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .