Gap edge attributes in Neotropical rainforest, Ecuador

In many parts of the world, forestry objectives are now shifting from focusing on maximum production to a wider perspective that includes biodiversity preservation and ecosystem functioning. To achieve these targets, managers are increasingly designing cutting regimes that imitate natural disturbances, with the aim of generating a more naturally structured forest. In many old-growth forests, tree fall gaps caused by tree death constitute the dominant type of disturbance. The application of gap dynamics theory appears to be a promising option for tropical forest management and conservation. In the present study of a tree species-rich and old-growth Ecuadorian Neotropical forest, we assessed the spatial distribution of gaps and gap size in relation to: i) tree number at the gap edge, ii) number of tree species at the gap edge, iii) number of tree species per stem at the gap edge, iv) species similarity, v) species evenness at the gap edge, vi) size differentiation at the gap edge, vii) gap isolation and viii) species mingling at the gap edge. Understanding natural gap processes in these forests is crucial for establishing new forestry practices in these forests to mimic natural processes of disturbance. Our results demonstrated that the spatial distribution of gaps was random. Various gap attributes were strongly associated with gap size. The number of tree species per stem at the gap edge was negatively correlated to the gap size. Gap sizes up to 50 m 2 were mostly sufficient to generate tree species-rich forest stands. Assuming that our results were representative for an old-growth neotropical rainforest in Ecuador, our study remarks the following management recommendations: 1) Rainforests have a very complex spatial and diversity structure and logging activities should preferably be omitted because of adverse effects. 2) If logging is inevitable, this should mimic a random choice of trees and tree species, to prevent special selection of tree dimension and species; and a random distribution of trees to be logged, to produce gaps smaller than 50 m 2 and never larger than 400 m 2 . Additionally, we suggest cutting not more than 5 % of the tree biomass per 10-20 years period, to preclude stronger alterations of ecosystem processes, and the reduction of existing dead wood from the ecosystem.

[1]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[2]  N. Brokaw,et al.  The definition of treefall gap and its effect on measures of forest dynamics. , 1982 .

[3]  N. Brokaw Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. , 1985 .

[4]  G. Hartshorn,et al.  Canopy openings in a primary neotropical lowland forest , 1986, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[5]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Models of the development of spatial pattern of an even-aged plant population over time , 1987 .

[6]  Laura Arriaga Gap dynamics of a tropical cloud forest in northeastern Mexico , 1988 .

[7]  T. C. Whitmore,et al.  Canopy Gaps and the Two Major Groups of Forest Trees , 1989 .

[8]  C. Canham Different Respones to Gaps Among Shade‐Tollerant Tree Species , 1989 .

[9]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Sapling Survival, Growth, and Recruitment: Relationship to Canopy Height in a Neotropical Forest , 1991 .

[10]  B. Everitt,et al.  Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. , 1993 .

[11]  F. Bongers,et al.  Spatial distribution of gaps along three catenas in the moist forest of Taï National Park, Ivory Coast , 1994, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[12]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[13]  D. Polit-O'hara Data analysis & statistics for nursing research , 1996 .

[14]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Light-Gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest , 1999, Science.

[15]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Measuring Biodiversity , 1999 .

[16]  N. Brokaw,et al.  Niche versus chance and tree diversity in forest gaps. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  J. Svenning,et al.  Small Canopy Gaps Influence Plant Distributions in the Rain Forest Understory1 , 2000 .

[18]  Danielle J. Marceau,et al.  Quantifying gap dynamics at the patch mosaic level using a spatially-explicit model of a northern hardwood forest ecosystem , 2001 .

[19]  H. Gregorius THE NOTION OF STABILITY IN OPEN DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS FROM AN ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[20]  O. Dam Forest filled with gaps : effects of gap size on water and nutrient cycling in tropical rain forest : a study in Guyana , 2001 .

[21]  David Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion , 2002, Nature.

[22]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Tree canopy displacement at forest gap edges , 2002 .

[23]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Sapling Diversity in Canopy Gaps in an Ecuadorian Rain Forest , 2003 .

[24]  K. Gadow Waldstruktur und Wachstum , 2003 .

[25]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations , 1984, Oecologia.

[26]  F. Bongers,et al.  Formation and closure of canopy gaps in the rain forest at Nouragues, French Guiana , 1996, Vegetatio.

[27]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[28]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands , 2008 .

[29]  Anja Nygren,et al.  Treefall gaps of certified, conventionally managed and natural forests as regeneration sites for Neotropical timber trees in northern Honduras , 2008 .

[30]  Thomas H. Kunz,et al.  Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park , 2010, PloS one.

[31]  Ulrich Bodenhofer,et al.  APCluster: an R package for affinity propagation clustering , 2011, Bioinform..

[32]  James G. Bockheim,et al.  Methods for studying treefall gaps: A review , 2011 .

[33]  Christian Wehenkel,et al.  Estimating balanced structure areas in multi-species forests on the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[34]  Mykola Korol,et al.  Forest Structure and Diversity , 2012 .

[35]  Jürgen Homeier,et al.  Effects of soil chemistry on tropical forest biomass and productivity at different elevations in the equatorial Andes , 2012, Oecologia.

[36]  Josep L. Garcia-Domingo,et al.  A Pair-Approximation Model for Spatial Patterns in Tree Populations with Asymmetrical Resource Competition , 2013 .

[37]  K. Gadow,et al.  Quantifying differences between ecosystems with particular reference to selection forests in Durango/Mexico , 2014 .

[38]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[39]  C. Wehenkel,et al.  Correction: Spatial Distribution Patterns in the Very Rare and Species-Rich Picea chihuahuana Tree Community (Mexico) , 2015, PloS one.