Justifiable Group Choice

We study the judgment aggregation problem from the perspective of justifying a particular collective decision by a corresponding aggregation on the criteria. In particular, we characterize the logical relations between the decision and the criteria that enable justification of a majority decision through a proposition-wise aggregation rule with no veto power on the criteria. While the well-studied "doctrinal paradox" provides a negative example in which no such justification exists, we show that genuine possibility results emerge if there is a gap between the necessary and the sufficient conditions for the decision. This happens, for instance, if there is only a partial consensus about the appropriate criteria for the decision, if only a subset of these criteria can be elicited, or if the judgment on criteria is based on probabilistic acceptance thresholds.

[1]  Lawrence G. Sager,et al.  Unpacking the Court , 1986 .

[2]  Marc Pauly,et al.  Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation , 2006, J. Philos. Log..

[3]  Franz Dietrich,et al.  The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[4]  Ron Holzman,et al.  Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas , 2009, Soc. Choice Welf..

[5]  C. List,et al.  Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result , 2002, Economics and Philosophy.

[6]  Klaus Nehring,et al.  Abstract Arrowian aggregation , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[7]  Philippe Mongin,et al.  The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[8]  C. List.  The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason* , 2006, Ethics.

[9]  Christian List,et al.  Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation , 2005, Soc. Choice Welf..

[10]  Ron Holzman,et al.  Aggregation of binary evaluations , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[11]  C. List,et al.  Judgment aggregation: A survey , 2009 .

[12]  Philip Pettit,et al.  Groups with minds of their own , 2001 .

[13]  Isaac Levi.  List and Pettit , 2004, Synthese.

[14]  Michael K. Miller.  JUDGMENT AGGREGATION AND SUBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING * , 2008 .

[15]  Franz Dietrich,et al.  Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  Klaus Nehring,et al.  Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..

[17]  Ron Holzman,et al.  Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[18]  C. Puppe,et al.  The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice , 2009 .

[19]  Klaus Nehring,et al.  The impossibility of a Paretian rational: A Bayesian perspective , 2007 .

[20]  P. Pettit.  Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma , 2001 .

[21]  Klaus Nehring.  Oligarchies in Judgment Aggregation , 2006 .

[22]  Klaus Nehring,et al.  The structure of strategy-proof social choice - Part I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[23]  Philippe Mongin,et al.  Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.