New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training

We argue herein that typical training procedures are far from optimal. The goat of training in real-world settings is, or should be, to support two aspects of posttraining performance: (a) the level of performance in the long term and (b) the capability to transfer that training to related tasks and altered contexts. The implicit or explicit assumption of those persons responsible for training is that the procedures that enhance performance and speed improvement during training will necessarily achieve these two goals. However, a variety of experiments on motor and verbal learning indicate that this assumption is often incorrect. Manipulations that maximize performance during training can be detrimental in the long term; conversely, manipulations that degrade the speed of acquisition can support the long-term goals of training. The fact that there are parallel findings in the motor and verbal domains suggests that principles of considerable generality can be deduced to upgrade training procedures.

[1]  F. W. Irwin Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men , 1932, The Psychological Clinic.

[2]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[3]  W. Estes Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. , 1955, Psychological review.

[4]  C. Burt THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING , 1958 .

[5]  W. Runquist,et al.  Learning and retention of paired adjectives as a function of percentage occurrence of response members. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. J. Lavery Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. , 1962 .

[7]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Supplementary report: time between pairings and short-term retention. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  R. Weisman,et al.  The effect of intermittent confirmation in programed instruction. , 1962 .

[9]  A. W. Melton Repetition and retrieval from memory. , 1967, Science.

[10]  M. HenryF.,et al.  Specificity vs.generality in learning motor skill , 1968 .

[11]  G. A. Allen,et al.  Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates , 1969 .

[12]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding? , 1970 .

[13]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall , 1971 .

[14]  E. Tulving,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context , 1971 .

[15]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[16]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[17]  John B. Shea,et al.  The effects on skill acquisition of an interpolated motor short-term memory task during the kr-delay interval. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[19]  Kathleen Elizabeth Nitsch Structuring decontextualized forms of knowledge , 1977 .

[20]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning , 1978 .

[21]  R. Kerr,et al.  Specific and Varied Practice of Motor Skill , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[22]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. , 1978 .

[23]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Emotional Mood as a Context for Learning and Recall. , 1978 .

[24]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .

[25]  H. P. Bahrick Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. , 1979 .

[26]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[27]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[28]  Agr McClelland,et al.  LEVELS OF PROCESSING , 1980 .

[29]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Spacing repetitions over 1 week , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[30]  L. Jacoby,et al.  When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects , 1982 .

[31]  J D Hagman,et al.  Presentation- and test-trial effects on acquisition and retention of distance and location. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  R. Magill,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. The Locus of Contextual Interference in Motor-Skill Acquisition i , 2022 .

[33]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  B. Kleiner,et al.  Distant Transfer in Coincident Timing as a Function of Variability of Practice , 1984 .

[35]  Vito Modigliani,et al.  The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists. , 1985 .

[36]  R. Magill,et al.  Contextual Interference Effects in Learning Three Badminton Serves , 1986 .

[37]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Knowledge Organization and Text Organization , 1987 .

[38]  G Wulf,et al.  Variability in practice: facilitation in retention and transfer through schema formation or context effects? , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  Timothy D. Lee Chapter 7 Transfer-Appropriate Processing: A Framework for Conceptualizing Practice Effects in Motor Learning , 1988 .

[40]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[41]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. , 1989 .

[42]  R. Bjork Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. , 1989 .

[43]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning , 1990 .

[45]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[46]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference: Contributions of practice , 1990 .

[47]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[48]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations , 1991 .

[49]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Motor learning & performance : from principles to practice , 1991 .

[50]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[51]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  From learning processes to cognitive processes , 1992 .