"Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications

Automatically triggered cameras taking photographs or videos of passing animals (camera traps) have emerged over the last decade as one of the most powerful tool for wildlife research. In parallel, a wealth of camera trap systems and models has become commercially available, a phenomenon mainly driven by the increased use of camera traps by sport hunters. This has raised the need for developing criteria to choose the suitable camera trap model in relation to a range of factors, primarily the study aim, but also target species, habitat, trapping site, climate and any other aspect that affects camera performance. There is also fragmented information on the fundamentals of sampling designs that deploy camera trapping, such as number of sampling sites, spatial arrangement and sampling duration. In this review, we describe the relevant technological features of camera traps and propose a set of the key ones to be evaluated when choosing camera models. These features are camera specifications such as trigger speed, sensor sensitivity, detection zone, flash type and flash intensity, power autonomy, and related specifications. We then outline sampling design and camera features for the implementation of major camera trapping applications, specifically: (1) faunal inventories, (2) occupancy studies, (3) density estimation through Capture-Mark-Recapture and (4) density estimation through the Random Encounter Model. We also review a range of currently available models and stress the need for standardized testing of camera models that should be frequently updated and widely distributed. Finally we summarize the "ultimate camera trap", as desired by wildlife biologists, and the current technological limitations of camera traps in relation to their potential for a number of emerging applications. Download the complete issue.

[1]  James D Nichols,et al.  Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling. , 2006, Ecology.

[2]  A. Bowkett,et al.  The use of camera‐trap data to model habitat use by antelope species in the Udzungwa Mountain forests, Tanzania , 2008 .

[3]  M. Efford Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[4]  David L. Smith,et al.  The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals , 2001, Animal Conservation.

[5]  Estimation of population density of European pine marten in central Italy using camera trapping , 2012, Acta Theriologica.

[6]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Density Estimation by Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture: Likelihood-Based Methods , 2009 .

[7]  M. Graipel,et al.  Activity pattern of Atlantic Forest small arboreal mammals as revealed by camera traps , 2008, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[8]  Darryl I MacKenzie,et al.  Sampling design trade-offs in occupancy studies with imperfect detection: examples and software. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  J. Ahumada,et al.  Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: data from a global camera trap network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Yoan Dinata,et al.  Estimating occupancy of a data deficient mammalian species living in tropical rainforests: Sun bears in the Kerinci Seblat region, Sumatra , 2007 .

[11]  E. Cuéllar,et al.  A Camera Trapping and Radio Telemetry Study of Lowland Tapir ( Tapirus terrestris ) in Bolivian Dry Forests , 2003 .

[12]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Program SPACECAP: software for estimating animal density using spatially explicit capture–recapture models , 2012 .

[13]  James G. Sanderson,et al.  Monitoring Elusive Mammals , 2005 .

[14]  D. MacKenzie Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[15]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera traps in animal ecology : methods and analyses , 2011 .

[16]  Marcella J. Kelly,et al.  COMPUTER-AIDED PHOTOGRAPH MATCHING IN STUDIES USING INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFICATION: AN EXAMPLE FROM SERENGETI CHEETAHS , 2001 .

[17]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Camera traps in animal ecology and conservation: What's next? , 2011 .

[18]  Katie,et al.  USING CAMERAS TO MONITOR TUNNEL USE BY LONG-TOED SALAMANDERS ( AMBYSTOMA MACRODACTYLUM ) : AN INFORMATIVE , COST-EFFICIENT TECHNIQUE , 2011 .

[19]  C. Carbone,et al.  Surveys using camera traps: are we looking to a brighter future? , 2008 .

[20]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[21]  M. Kelly,et al.  Estimating Puma Densities from Camera Trapping across Three Study Sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize , 2008 .

[22]  Larissa L. Bailey,et al.  Inference for Occupancy and Occupancy Dynamics , 2011 .

[23]  D. Swann,et al.  Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: an evaluation and review , 2004 .

[24]  Jerrold L. Belant,et al.  How Does Spatial Study Design Influence Density Estimates from Spatial Capture-Recapture Models? , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Occupancy as a surrogate for abundance estimation , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[26]  M. Kinnaird,et al.  Effects of Private‐Land Use, Livestock Management, and Human Tolerance on Diversity, Distribution, and Abundance of Large African Mammals , 2012, Conservation Biology.

[27]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatially explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. , 2010, Ecology.

[28]  T. Cutler Using remote photography in wildlife ecology : a review , 1999 .

[29]  Ana Carolina Srbek-Araujo,et al.  Is camera-trapping an efficient method for surveying mammals in Neotropical forests? A case study in south-eastern Brazil , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[30]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera‐trap studies , 2009 .

[31]  Ian A. Wright,et al.  Sarcoptes mange (Sarcoptes scabiei) increases diurnal activity of bare-nosed wombats (Vombatus ursinus) in an agricultural riparian environment , 2012 .

[32]  Roger Pradel,et al.  ESTIMATING SURVIVAL AND TEMPORARY EMIGRATION IN THE MULTISTATE CAPTURE–RECAPTURE FRAMEWORK , 2004 .

[33]  F. Rovero,et al.  A POTENTIALLY NEW GIANT SENGI (ELEPHANT-SHREW) FROM THE UDZUNGWA MOUNTAINS, TANZANIA , 2006 .

[34]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[35]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Using digital time-lapse cameras to monitor species-specific understorey and overstorey phenology in support of wildlife habitat assessment , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[36]  M. A. Sawaya,et al.  Banff Wildlife Crossings Project: Integrating Science and Education in Restoring Population Connectivity Across Transportation Corridors , 2009 .

[37]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Estimating Tiger Abundance from Camera Trap Data: Field Surveys and Analytical Issues , 2011 .

[38]  E. Revilla,et al.  One or two cameras per station? Monitoring jaguars and other mammals in the Amazon , 2012, Ecological Research.

[39]  Francesco Rovero,et al.  Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates , 2009 .

[40]  K. U. Karanth,et al.  A tiger cannot change its stripes: using a three-dimensional model to match images of living tigers and tiger skins , 2009, Biology Letters.

[41]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data. , 2008, Ecology.

[42]  Timothy G. O'Brien,et al.  The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels , 2010 .

[43]  W. Boyce,et al.  SCAVENGING BEHAVIOR IN PUMA , 2005 .

[44]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[45]  Samuel T. Turvey,et al.  Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition , 2008 .

[46]  B. D. Taylor,et al.  Wooden poles can provide habitat connectivity for a gliding mammal , 2011 .

[47]  E. Guiler Thylacine : the tragedy of the Tasmanian tiger , 1985 .

[48]  Mathias W. Tobler,et al.  Habitat use, activity patterns and use of mineral licks by five species of ungulate in south-eastern Peru , 2009, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[49]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[50]  I. Gordon,et al.  Using a General Index Approach to Analyze Camera-Trap Abundance Indices , 2011 .

[51]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[52]  Paul D. Meek,et al.  Temporal activity patterns of the swamp rat (Rattus lutreolus) and other rodents in north-eastern New South Wales, Australia , 2012 .

[53]  M. Heurich,et al.  Evaluation of six digital camera models for the use in capture-recapture sampling of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx) , 2013 .

[54]  Paul D. Meek,et al.  User-based design specifications for the ultimate camera trap for wildlife research , 2012, Wildlife Research.

[55]  Rebecca J. Foster,et al.  A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data† , 2012 .

[56]  Kae Kawanishi,et al.  Evaluating Types and Features of Camera Traps in Ecological Studies: A Guide for Researchers , 2011 .

[57]  R. Barrett,et al.  A History of Camera Trapping , 2011 .

[58]  Rahel Sollmann,et al.  Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil , 2011 .

[59]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape , 2003 .

[60]  Jamie McCallum,et al.  Changing use of camera traps in mammalian field research: habitats, taxa and study types , 2013 .

[61]  Checklist of mammals of the Udzungwa Mountains of Tanzania , 2007 .

[62]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data: comment. , 2011, Ecology.

[63]  M. J Mammal Diversity and Conservation in a Secondary Forest in Peninsular Malaysia , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[64]  Hany Farid,et al.  A computer‐assisted system for photographic mark–recapture analysis , 2012 .

[65]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[66]  M. Tobler,et al.  An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large‐ and medium‐sized terrestrial rainforest mammals , 2008 .

[67]  D. Hughson,et al.  COMPARISON OF MOTION-ACTIVATED CAMERAS FOR WILDLIFE INVESTIGATIONS , 2012 .

[68]  R. Kays,et al.  Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach , 2011 .