Three-dimensional stress analysis for beam-like structures using Serendipity Lagrange shape functions

Abstract Simple analytical and finite element models are widely employed by practising engineers for the stress analysis of beam structures, because of their simplicity and acceptable levels of accuracy. However, the validity of these models is limited by assumptions of material heterogeneity, geometric dimensions and slenderness, and by Saint-Venant’s Principle, i.e. they are only applicable to regions remote from boundary constraints, discontinuities and points of load application. To predict accurate stress fields in these locations, computationally expensive three-dimensional (3D) finite element analyses are routinely performed. Alternatively, displacement based high-order beam models are often employed to capture localised three-dimensional stress fields analytically. Herein, a novel approach for the analysis of beam-like structures is presented. The approach is based on the Unified Formulation by Carrera and co-workers, and is able to recover complex, 3D stress fields in a computationally efficient manner. As a novelty, purposely adapted, hierarchical polynomials are used to define cross-sectional displacements. Due to the nature of their properties with respect to computational nodes, these functions are known as Serendipity Lagrange polynomials. This new cross-sectional expansion model is benchmarked against traditional finite elements and other implementations of the Unified Formulation by means of static analyses of beams with different complex cross-sections. It is shown that Serendipity Lagrange elements solve some of the shortcomings of the most commonly used Unified Formulation beam models based on Taylor and Lagrange expansion functions. Furthermore, significant computational efficiency gains over 3D finite elements are achieved for similar levels of accuracy.

[1]  D. Hodges,et al.  Validation of the Variational Asymptotic Beam Sectional Analysis , 2002 .

[2]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  X. On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross-section , 1922 .

[3]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Static and free vibration analysis of laminated beams by refined theory based on Chebyshev polynomials , 2015 .

[4]  G. Arfken Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 1967 .

[5]  P. Ladevèze,et al.  De nouveaux concepts en théorie des poutres pour des charges et géométries quelconques , 1996 .

[6]  Yogesh M. Desai,et al.  Free vibrations of laminated beams using mixed theory , 2001 .

[7]  T. J. Rivlin,et al.  An optimal property of Chebyshev expansions , 1969 .

[8]  I. Babuska,et al.  Introduction to Finite Element Analysis: Formulation, Verification and Validation , 2011 .

[9]  John P. Boyd,et al.  The Relationships Between Chebyshev, Legendre and Jacobi Polynomials: The Generic Superiority of Chebyshev Polynomials and Three Important Exceptions , 2014, J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  J. Reddy Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells : theory and analysis , 1996 .

[11]  Dan T. Mucichescu,et al.  Bounds for Stiffness of Prismatic Beams , 1984 .

[12]  E. Carrera,et al.  Refined beam theories based on a unified formulation , 2010 .

[13]  Christopher S. Lynch,et al.  Mechanics of Materials and Mechanics of Materials , 1996 .

[14]  Gaetano Giunta,et al.  A modern and compact way to formulate classical and advanced beam theories , 2010 .

[15]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Analysis of laminated beams via Unified Formulation and Legendre polynomial expansions , 2016 .

[16]  Erian A. Armanios,et al.  Theory of anisotropic thin-walled closed-cross-section beams , 1992 .

[17]  V. Berdichevskiĭ Equations of the theory of anisotropic inhomogeneous rods , 1976 .

[18]  Karan S. Surana,et al.  Two-dimensional curved beam element with higher-order hierarchical transverse approximation for laminated composites , 1990 .

[19]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Refined One-Dimensional Formulations for Laminated Structure Analysis , 2012 .

[20]  I. S. Sokolnikoff Mathematical theory of elasticity , 1946 .

[21]  Dinar Camotim,et al.  Second-order generalised beam theory for arbitrary orthotropic materials , 2002 .

[22]  E. Carrera Theories and finite elements for multilayered, anisotropic, composite plates and shells , 2002 .

[23]  E. Kreyszig,et al.  Advanced Engineering Mathematics. , 1974 .

[24]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  A computationally efficient 2D model for inherently equilibrated 3D stress predictions in heterogeneous laminated plates. Part I: Model formulation , 2016 .

[25]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[26]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Recent developments on refined theories for beams with applications , 2015 .

[27]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Laminated beam analysis by polynomial, trigonometric, exponential and zig-zag theories , 2013 .

[28]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Structures through Unified Formulation , 2014 .

[29]  Jimmy C. Ho,et al.  Variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis – An updated version , 2012 .

[30]  G. Cowper The Shear Coefficient in Timoshenko’s Beam Theory , 1966 .

[31]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Component-wise analysis of laminated anisotropic composites , 2012 .

[32]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  New concepts for linear beam theory with arbitrary geometry and loading , 1998 .

[33]  Gaetano Giunta,et al.  Beam Structures: Classical and Advanced Theories , 2011 .