Knee function after limb salvage surgery for malignant bone tumor: comparison of megaprosthesis and distal femur allograft with epiphysis sparing

PurposeLimb salvage surgery is increasingly used for the treatment of distal femur bone sarcomas. Total knee replacement using megaprosthesis and epiphysis-sparing biologic reconstruction using an allograft are widely used in order to preserve joint motion. We aimed to compare the results of these procedures using gait analysis in patients undergoing limb salvage surgery.MethodsFifteen patients were included, nine undergoing allograft with epiphysis sparing (Allograft group) and six undergoing megaprosthesis (Megaprosthesis group). Every patient underwent a gait analysis using the Plug-in-Gait protocol. Spatiotemporal parameters, knee kinematics, and kinetics were compared between the two groups and a cohort of ten asymptomatic subjects. Knee function was assessed by the Gait Deviation Index (GDI) and the Gilette Gait Index (GGI).ResultsBoth treatment groups showed decreased knee flexion during the loading response phase. Megaprosthesis patients showed a decreased knee flexion all along stance phase. There was no difference in gait pattern between the treatment groups. GDI was significantly lower in Megaprosthesis and Allograft patients when compared to controls (86.4 and 84.3 vs 94, all p < 0.05). This difference was not clinically relevant.ConclusionOur study reveals that Megaprosthesis and Allograft patients did not show differences in gait patterns and global function. Even though Allograft and Megaprosthesis patients have significant changes in gait pattern, knee function is acceptable with effective gait mechanisms. Changes occur during stance phase and are due to the quadriceps weakness. The particular pattern of gait in Megaprosthesis patients could be a concern for prosthesis wear and should be investigated on this specific aspect.Level of evidence: 4

[1]  R. E. Carroll,et al.  Osteogenic sarcoma in the hand. , 1957, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  J. Perry.  Pathologic gait. , 1990, Instructional course lectures.

[3]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  R. B. Davis,et al.  A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique , 1991 .

[5]  R. Biagini,et al.  The effect of quadriceps excision on functional results after distal femoral resection and prosthetic replacement of bone tumors. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Janice K. Loudon,et al.  The Clinical Orthopedic Assessment Guide , 1998 .

[7]  L. Schutte,et al.  An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[8]  J. Halbertsma,et al.  Gait and function in patients with a femoral endoprosthesis after tumor resection , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  S. Giannini,et al.  Total knee replacement versus osteochondral allograft in proximal tibia bone tumours , 2007, International Orthopaedics.

[10]  U. Croce,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[11]  Michael H Schwartz,et al.  The Gait Deviation Index: a new comprehensive index of gait pathology. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[12]  M. Bennett,et al.  Assessment of kinematic and kinetic patterns following limb salvage procedures for bone sarcoma. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[13]  C. Carty,et al.  Impairment and disability following limb salvage procedures for bone sarcoma. , 2009, The Knee.

[14]  K. Ward,et al.  Survival outcomes of pediatric osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma: a comparison of surgery type within the SEER database, 1988-2007. , 2011, Journal of registry management.

[15]  Benjamin J Fregly,et al.  Knee joint forces: prediction, measurement, and significance , 2012, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Compensation by nonoperated joints in the lower limbs during walking after endoprosthetic knee replacement following bone tumor resection. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  M. Benedetti,et al.  Comparison of allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction and modular prosthetic replacement in proximal femur bone tumors , 2013, Acta orthopaedica.

[18]  C. Charalambous.  The Major Determinants in Normal and Pathological Gait , 2014 .

[19]  G. Farfalli,et al.  Survival, Recurrence, and Function After Epiphyseal Preservation and Allograft Reconstruction in Osteosarcoma of the Knee , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  J. Argenson,et al.  The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  G. Deuretzbacher,et al.  Gait analysis in tumor patients after distal femoral resection and implantation of a megaprosthesis. , 2016, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[22]  Gisele Francini Devetak,et al.  Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of the Gait Deviation Index (GDI) in post-stroke patients. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[23]  Hans Kainz,et al.  Reliability of four models for clinical gait analysis. , 2017, Gait & posture.