Validation of Daganzo's Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow: Final Report

A study was conducted to verify C. F. Daganzo's behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow (1, 2). This study was conducted by teams from San Diego State University and the University of California at Berkeley who worked independently on a series of case studies to test predictions derived from the theory. The results of the study suggest that some of the phenomena predicted by Daganzo do occur, but not at all locations, and that the underlying behavioral assumptions are oversimplified. Specifically, the types of flow- density (or flow-occupancy) relationship assumed by Daganzo were found to occur at some sites but not others; semi-congested states and fast waves between semi-congested and fully-congested states, as predicted by Daganzo were observed at one site; an increase in average time gaps indicating a "loss of motivation" assumed by Daganzo was observed at one site but not at others; speeds were found not to be equalized among lanes in congested flow, contrary to Daganzo.s assumption and most past literature; redistribution of flow among lanes was observed at flow breakdown despite the absence of speed equalization, contrary to Daganzo's behavioral assumptions; and distinct capacity and discharge flow states predicted by Daganzo were not observed downstream from queues. Observations not directly related to the test of Daganzo.s theory included details of lane-by-lane speed behavior in congested flow, a case in which the location of the point of maximum density upstream from a bottleneck may have influenced its capacity, and observations of general characteristics of incident recovery flow.

[1]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF MULTI-LANE TRAFFIC FLOW. PART I, LONG HOMOGENEOUS FREEWAY SECTIONS , 1999 .

[2]  James H Banks.  Investigation of Some Characteristics of Congested Flow , 1999 .

[3]  M. Cassidy,et al.  Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks , 1999 .

[4]  R S Foote,et al.  EFFECT OF SHOCK WAVES ON TUNNEL TRAFFIC FLOW , 1960 .

[5]  Kerner,et al.  Experimental properties of complexity in traffic flow. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  Kerner,et al.  Experimental features and characteristics of traffic jams. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[7]  Yong Shi,et al.  SOME OBSERVATIONS ON SPEED-FLOW AND FLOW-OCCUPANCY RELATIONSHIPS UNDER CONGESTED CONDITIONS , 1993 .

[8]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  EVALUATION OF HIGH-VOLUME URBAN TEXAS FREEWAYS , 1991 .

[9]  H. Mika,et al.  DUAL MODE BEHAVIOR OF FREEWAY TRAFFIC , 1969 .

[10]  Kerner,et al.  Structure and parameters of clusters in traffic flow. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  Robert Herman,et al.  Vehicular traffic science; proceedings of the third International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, New York, 1965 , 1967 .

[12]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Fundamentals of Transportation and Traffic Operations , 1997 .

[13]  Joseph W Hess.  CAPACITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF RAMP-FREEWAY CONNECTIONS , 1963 .

[14]  C. Daganzo.  Requiem for second-order fluid approximations of traffic flow , 1995 .

[15]  M. Mauch.  Analyses of Start-Stop Waves in Congested Freeway Traffic , 2002 .

[16]  Joseph W Hess.  RAMP-FREEWAY TERMINAL OPERATION AS RELATED TO FREEWAY LANE VOLUME DISTRIBUTION AND ADJACENT RAMP INFLUENCE , 1965 .

[17]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Modeling Multiple User-Class Traffic , 1998 .

[18]  J. Banks,et al.  EFFECTS OF LOCATION ON CONGESTED-REGIME FLOW-CONCENTRATION RELATIONSHIPS FOR FREEWAYS , 1993 .

[19]  Masato Iwasaki.  EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CONGESTED TRAFFIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AND FREE SPEED AFFECTED BY GEOMETRIC FACTORS ON AN INTERCITY EXPRESSWAY , 1991 .

[20]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF MULTI-LANE TRAFFIC FLOW. PART II, MERGES AND THE ONSET OF CONGESTION , 1999 .

[21]  James H Banks,et al.  TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON AT FREEWAY BOTTLENECKS: A BASIS FOR RAMP METERING? , 1991 .

[22]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A SIMPLIFIED THEORY OF KINEMATIC WAVES , 1991 .

[23]  B. Kerner.  EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES OF SELF-ORGANIZATION IN TRAFFIC FLOW , 1998 .

[24]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  FREEWAY CAPACITY DROP AND THE DEFINITION OF CAPACITY , 1991 .

[25]  K. Kockelman.  Changes in Flow-Density Relationship Due to Environmental, Vehicle, and Driver Characteristics , 1998 .

[26]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  STUDY OF FREEWAY BOTTLENECKS IN TEXAS , 1993 .

[27]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Coherent moving states in highway traffic , 1998, Nature.

[28]  Harold J Payne,et al.  MODELS OF FREEWAY TRAFFIC AND CONTROL. , 1971 .

[29]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING DYNAMICS OF FREEWAY TRAFFIC FLOW , 1995 .

[30]  Robert L. Bertini.  Time-Dependent Traffic Flow Features at a Freeway Bottleneck Downstream of a Merge , 1999 .

[31]  J. Banks.  THE TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON: SOME THEORETICAL ISSUES , 1991 .

[32]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CONGESTED FLOW ON A FREEWAY ACROSS LANES, SPACE AND TIME , 1988 .

[33]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  Probabilistic nature of breakdown at freeway merge junctions , 1995 .

[34]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Breakdown-Related Capacity for Freeway with Ramp Metering , 2001 .

[35]  C. Daganzo.  THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL.. , 1994 .

[36]  James H Banks.  FLOW PROCESSES AT A FREEWAY BOTTLENECK , 1990 .

[37]  Doug Robertson,et al.  Study of Speed-Flow Relationships on Individual Freeway Lanes , 1997 .

[38]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  EFFECT OF WEATHER ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLOW AND OCCUPANCY ON FREEWAYS , 1988 .

[39]  L Newman.  TRAFFIC OPERATION AT TWO INTERCHANGES IN CALIFORNIA , 1963 .

[40]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[41]  Brian L Allen,et al.  ANOTHER LOOK AT IDENTIFYING SPEED-FLOW RELATIONSHIPS ON FREEWAYS , 1985 .

[42]  James H Banks.  FREEWAY SPEED-FLOW-CONCENTRATION RELATIONSHIPS: MORE EVIDENCE AND INTERPRETATIONS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1989 .

[43]  J Treiterer,et al.  THE HYSTERESIS PHENOMENON IN TRAFFIC FLOW , 1974 .

[44]  Harold J Payne,et al.  FREFLO: A MACROSCOPIC SIMULATION MODEL OF FREEWAY TRAFFIC , 1979 .

[45]  Boris S. Kerner,et al.  Theory of Breakdown Phenomenon at Highway Bottlenecks , 2000 .

[46]  Anastasios S. Lyrintzis,et al.  Improved High-Order Model for Freeway Traffic Flow , 1998 .

[47]  Kerner,et al.  Cluster effect in initially homogeneous traffic flow. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[48]  Boris S. Kerner,et al.  Asymptotic theory of traffic jams , 1997 .

[49]  T. W. Forbes,et al.  Driver-and-Vehiele Response in Freeway Deceleration Waves , 1968 .

[50]  Piet H. L. Bovy,et al.  Car-Following Under Congested Conditions: Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[51]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Exploration of the Breakdown Phenomenon in Freeway Traffic , 1998 .

[52]  James H Banks,et al.  SYNTHESIS OF RECENT WORK ON THE NATURE OF SPEED-FLOW AND FLOW-OCCUPANCY (OR DENSITY) RELATIONSHIPS ON FREEWAYS , 1992 .

[53]  Javrns,et al.  Flow Processes at a Freeway Bottleneck , 2022 .

[54]  Robert Herman,et al.  Kinetic theory of vehicular traffic , 1971 .