SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Erfurt University of Education English-speaking college students who were enrolled in a German course read a 762-word German language story presented by a computer program. For key words in the story, students could choose to see a translation on the screen in English (i.e., verbal annotation) or view a picture or video clip representing the word (i.e,, visual annotation), or both. Students remembered word translations better when they had selected both visual and verbal annotations during learning than only 1 or no annotation; students comprehended the story better when they had the opportunity to receive their preferred mode of annotation. Results are consistent with a generative theory of multimedia learning that assumes that learners actively select relevant verbal and visual information, organize the information into coherent mental representations, and integrate these newly constructed visual and verbal representations with one another. Current developments in information technologies have resulted in rapid advances in the application of instructional and educational technology. There seem to be, however, only small advances in corresponding basic research on the psychological principles of human learning in a multimedia learning environment (Kozma, 1991). This article deals with two of these psychological principles. On the one hand, multimedia learning requires the learner to process information presented in different modes (e.g., in a verbal and a visual mode). Thus, cognitive psychological theories on processing information such as Mayer's (1997) generative theory of multimedia learning are relevant. On the other hand, the term

[1]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior in authentic learning situations: The Visualizer/Verbalizer Behavior Observation Scale (VV-BOS). , 1998 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[3]  Thomas Rammsayer,et al.  Complex trait-treatment-interaction analysis: A powerful approach for analysing individual differences in experimental designs. , 1995 .

[4]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  Project CyberBuch : a hypermedia approach to computer-assisted language learning , 1995 .

[5]  R. Mayer,et al.  A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text , 1995 .

[6]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[7]  Neville J. Schofield,et al.  Position Location on Topographical Maps: Effects of Task Factors, Training, and Strategies , 1994 .

[8]  Ralph A. Alexander,et al.  Effect of error variance heterogeneity on the power of tests for regression slope differences. , 1994 .

[9]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Foreign Language Learning: A Research Perspective , 1994 .

[10]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction , 1993 .

[11]  Craig Deville,et al.  Modified scoring, traditional item analysis and Sato's caution index used to investigate the reading recall protocol , 1993 .

[12]  John R. Kirby,et al.  COLLABORATIVE AND COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF VERBAL AND SPATIAL PROCESSES , 1993 .

[13]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[14]  Martine Danan,et al.  Reversed subtitling and dual coding theory: New directions for foreign language instruction , 1992 .

[15]  J. B. Pouwels,et al.  The Effectiveness of Vocabulary Visual Aids for Auditory and Visual Foreign Language Students , 1992 .

[16]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Adaptive Lehrsysteme. Instruktionspsychologische Grundlagen und experimentelle Analysen. , 1992 .

[17]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[18]  W. Winn Learning from maps and diagrams , 1991 .

[19]  R. Kozma Learning with Media , 1991 .

[20]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[21]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation in computer-based instruction , 1990 .

[22]  M. Wittrock Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[23]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures , 1989 .

[24]  R. Finke,et al.  Principles of mental imagery , 1989 .

[25]  Steffen-Peter Ballstaedt,et al.  1 Problems in Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures , 1989 .

[26]  Phillip J. Moore,et al.  Verbal and visual learning styles , 1988 .

[27]  J. Reid The Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students. , 1987 .

[28]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[29]  Heinrich Böll The Stories of Heinrich Böll , 1986 .

[30]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[31]  William Flint Smith,et al.  Identifying student learning styles: proceed with caution! , 1984 .

[32]  R. Mayer Aids to text comprehension , 1984 .

[33]  W. Howard Levie,et al.  Effects of text illustrations: A review of research , 1982 .

[34]  Michel Denis,et al.  Imaging while reading text: A study of individual differences , 1982 .

[35]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding and bilingual memory , 1981 .

[36]  M. Wittrock,et al.  Neuropsychological and Cognitive Processes in Reading , 1981 .

[37]  Alain Desrochers,et al.  A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. , 1980 .

[38]  Alice C. Omaggio Pictures and Second Language Comprehension: Do They Help? , 1979 .

[39]  Alan Richardson,et al.  Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. , 1977 .

[40]  H. Reinert One picture is worth a thousand words? Not necessarily. , 1976 .

[41]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  Reading as a Generative Process. , 1975 .

[42]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  Learning as a Generative Process , 1974 .

[43]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[44]  Michael J. A. Howe,et al.  Using Words and Pictures in Foreign Language Learning. , 1971 .