Distributed Kalman Filtering over Big Data: Analysis Through Large Deviations of Random Riccati Equations

This paper studies the convergence of the estimation error process and the characterization of the corresponding invariant measure in distributed Kalman filtering for poten tially unstable and large linear dynamic systems. A gossip based in formation exchanging scheme termed Modified Gossip Interactiv e Kalman Filtering (M-GIKF) is proposed, where sensors exchange their filtered states (estimates and error covariances) andalso propagate their observations via inter-sensor communicat ions of rate γ, where γ is defined as the averaged number of intersensor message passages per signal evolution epoch. The filt red states are interpreted as stochastic particles with local i nteraction and it is shown that the conditional estimation error covariance sequence at each sensor under M-GIKF evolves as a random Riccati equation (RRE) with Markov modulated switching. By formulating the RRE as a random dynamical system, it is shown that the conditional estimation error covariance at each se nsor converges weakly (in distribution) to a unique invariant measure from any initial state. Further, it is proved that as γ → ∞ this invariant measure satisfies the Large Deviation (LD) upper and lower bounds, implying that this measure converges exponen tially fast (in probability) to the Dirac measure δP∗ , where P ∗ is the stable error covariance of the centralized (Kalman) filtering setup. The LD results answer a fundamental question on how to quantify the rate at which the distributed scheme approaches the centralized performance as the inter-sensor communica tion rate increases.

[1]  Stergios I. Roumeliotis,et al.  Consensus in Ad Hoc WSNs With Noisy Links—Part II: Distributed Estimation and Smoothing of Random Signals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  V. Araújo Random Dynamical Systems , 2006, math/0608162.

[3]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Fast linear iterations for distributed averaging , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[4]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Distributed Kalman filtering and Network Tracking Capacity , 2013, 2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[5]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Achieving 100% throughput in an input-queued switch , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[7]  R. Olfati-Saber,et al.  Distributed Kalman Filter with Embedded Consensus Filters , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Usman A. Khan,et al.  On the Genericity Properties in Distributed Estimation: Topology Design and Sensor Placement , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[9]  Soummya Kar,et al.  On connectivity, observability, and stability in distributed estimation , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[10]  Shinkyu Park,et al.  An augmented observer for the distributed estimation problem for LTI systems , 2011, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[11]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Distributed Kalman Filtering : Weak Consensus Under Weak Detectability , 2011 .

[12]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Gossip Algorithms for Distributed Signal Processing , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Moderate Deviations of a Random Riccati Equation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  A. Shiryaev,et al.  Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes , 1987 .

[15]  Ruggero Carli,et al.  Distributed Kalman filtering using consensus strategies , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  H. F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Fully decentralised algorithm for multisensor Kalman filtering , 1991 .