Validation of product quality through graphical interpretation of the Kano model

Purpose Product verification and validation are integral to quality management. Product verification means verifying the conformity between a product’s actual and planned characteristics whereas validation means determining whether and to what extent it satisfies customers’ requirements. One of the key forms of product validation is testing with a group of customers. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a graphical method of product validation based on the Kano model. Design/methodology/approach The approach is based on a proposed method for categorising requirements based on a Kano questionnaire and then applies this method for the validation of a product – a website. The proposed method is based on three steps: graphical determination of requirements in a Kano model; determination of requirement fulfilment degree and prioritisation of corrective measures and improvements. Findings The study opens space for discussion of the potential for improving a product and methods for identifying critical faults in products. The proposed method also permits an assessment of the potential effectiveness of an improvement because it is able to quantify the effect of the product on the consumer resulting from a given quantity of effort. A case study demonstrated that the resulting priority of corrective measures and improvements was affected not only by the level of fulfilment of the requirements but also by the type, the most critical being non-fulfilment of must-be requirements. Research limitations/implications The requirement curves are based on a verbal assessment of satisfaction in two states – if the requirement were fulfilled and if it were not fulfilled. The values of the start and end points may not be precise and could be affected by the natural character of subjective variables. Practical implications The proposed method is particularly suited to the initial testing of a product that is intended to lead to measures to eliminate customer dissatisfaction or increase their satisfaction – that is, to improve the product. The method also permits an assessment of the extent to which customers feel that their expectations have been satisfied and the effect that will be felt if the organisation decides to increase fulfilment. Originality/value The Kano model has not yet been applied to product validation, although it contains all the information necessary for this task. Knowing how satisfied customers are is an important part of product validation. At the same time, knowing a mechanism for “creating” this satisfaction is also very valuable information.

[1]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Typology of Kano models: a critical review of literature and proposition of a revised model , 2013 .

[2]  Pisut Koomsap,et al.  Improving risk assessment for customer-oriented FMEA , 2018 .

[3]  Rupert J. Baumgartner,et al.  Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry , 2017 .

[4]  Giovanna Padula,et al.  Understanding the relationship between attribute performance and overall satisfaction: Theory, measurement and implications , 2005 .

[5]  Emmanuel O. C. Mkpojiogu,et al.  Understanding the relationship between Kano model’s customer satisfaction scores and self-stated requirements importance , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[6]  R. Dholakia,et al.  A multi‐attribute model of web site interactivity and customer satisfaction , 2009 .

[7]  Yu-Cheng Lee,et al.  A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[9]  H. Katayama,et al.  Firm-level productivity studies: Illusions and a solution , 2009 .

[10]  A. Kazemi,et al.  Is organizational citizenship behavior an attractive behavior for managers? A Kano model approach , 2015 .

[11]  A. Shahin,et al.  Estimating customer lifetime value for new product development based on the Kano model with a case study in automobile industry , 2015 .

[12]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Towards the fine-tuning of a predictive Kano model for supporting product and service design , 2015 .

[13]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  Customer requirement prioritization on QFD: a new proposal based on the generalized Yager’s algorithm , 2015 .

[14]  J. R. Sharma,et al.  From customers requirements to customers satisfaction – quality function deployment in service sector , 2010 .

[15]  Xi Yang,et al.  An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis , 2009 .

[16]  Min Xie,et al.  An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano’s model and QFD , 2000 .

[17]  Ida Gremyr,et al.  Using an adapted approach to the Kano model to identify patient needs from various patient roles , 2016 .

[18]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Kano model: A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines , 2009 .

[19]  Armen Zakarian A methodology for the performance analysis of product validation and test plans , 2010 .

[20]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence , 2001 .

[21]  Chih-Hsuan Wang,et al.  Incorporating customer satisfaction into the decision-making process of product configuration: a fuzzy Kano perspective , 2013 .

[22]  Arash Shahin,et al.  Classifying and prioritising TV design attributes by Kano model and quadrant analysis: with a case study in Entekhab Industrial Group , 2017 .

[23]  Dennis Nobelius,et al.  Stop chasing the Front End process — management of the early phases in product development projects , 2002 .

[24]  Arash Shahin,et al.  Integration of FMEA and the Kano model , 2004 .

[25]  Mamoun N. Akroush An empirical model of new product development process: phases, antecedents and consequences , 2012 .

[26]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Customer Requirement Management in Product Development: A Review of Research Issues , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[27]  Angelos Pantouvakis,et al.  The relative importance of service features in explaining customer satisfaction , 2010 .

[28]  Ishardita Pambudi Tama,et al.  Development of Customer Oriented Product Design using Kansei Engineering and Kano Model: Case Study of Ceramic Souvenir , 2015 .

[29]  Chun-Chih Chen,et al.  Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design , 2008 .

[30]  Paulo Augusto Cauchick Miguel,et al.  Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—Types of research, difficulties and benefits , 2008 .

[31]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis , 2004 .

[32]  Shao-Bin Lin,et al.  A new Kano's evaluation sheet , 2011 .

[33]  Tzong-Chen Wu,et al.  Contribution to quality research: a literature review of Kano's model from 1998 to 2012 , 2015 .

[34]  Ching-Chow Yang,et al.  The refined Kano's model and its application , 2005 .

[35]  B. Busacca,et al.  Customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction in retail banking: Exploring the asymmetric impact of attribute performances , 2009 .

[37]  Om Prakash Yadav,et al.  Customer satisfaction driven quality improvement target planning for product development in automotive industry , 2008 .

[38]  S. Tsai,et al.  Empirical research on Kano’s model and customer satisfaction , 2017, PloS one.

[39]  Peter Madzík,et al.  Increasing accuracy of the Kano model – a case study , 2018 .

[40]  Rajeev Jain,et al.  Integration of Kano’s Model into quality function deployment (QFD) , 2011 .

[41]  Peter J. Danaher,et al.  A comparison of question scales used for measuring customer satisfaction , 1996 .

[42]  G. Tontini Integrating the Kano Model and QFD for Designing New Products , 2007 .

[43]  Hannu Kärkkäinen,et al.  Role of careful customer need assessment in product innovation management—empirical analysis , 2002 .

[44]  Klaus Solberg Søilen,et al.  How do interactions of Kano model attributes affect customer satisfaction? An analysis based on psychological foundations , 2013 .

[45]  Padmanav Acharya,et al.  Monitoring quality goals through lean Six‐Sigma insures competitiveness , 2012 .

[46]  Gary H. Chao,et al.  Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[47]  O. G. Akanbi,et al.  The combined application of Quality Function Deployment and Pareto analysis for hotel services improvement , 2008 .

[48]  Kai Yang,et al.  Product development processes – from deterministic to probabilistic: a Design for 6-Sigma approach to lean product validation, Part II , 2006 .

[49]  Lars Witell,et al.  Classification of quality attributes , 2007 .