Performance of uncoordinated and packetized code time division multiple access, and spread ALOHA

Uncoordinated and packetized code time division multiple access (CTDMA) is presented. It is shown that the only difference to spread ALOHA is the demodulation technique applied in the receiver. The capacity of uncoordinated and packetized CTDMA is then determined and evaluated. In particular, it is shown that CTDMA outperforms spread ALOHA, i.e., that a linear inverse filter outperforms a matched filter in terms of single-user capacity.

[1]  Norman Abramson,et al.  The Throughput of Packet Broadcasting Channels , 1977, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  U. Loher,et al.  A comparison of demodulation techniques for code time division multiple access , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[3]  M. Pursley,et al.  Performance Evaluation for Phase-Coded Spread-Spectrum Multiple-Access Communication - Part I: System Analysis , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[4]  Hans D. Schotten,et al.  On the optimum spreading sequence and mismatched filter design for cellular CTDMA , 1996, Proceedings of ISSSTA'95 International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications.

[5]  N. Abramson VSAT data networks , 1990 .

[6]  Fredy Neeser,et al.  Code time division multiple access: an indoor cellular system , 1992, [1992 Proceedings] Vehicular Technology Society 42nd VTS Conference - Frontiers of Technology.