A note on "beyond market baskets: generalizing association rules to correlations"

In their paper [1], S. Brin, R. Matwani and C. Silverstien discussed measuring significance of (generalized) association rules via the support and the chi-squared test for correlation. They provided some illustrative examples and pointed that the chi-squared test needs to be agumented by a measure of interest that they also suggested.This paper presents a further elaboration and extension of their discussion. As suggested by Brin et al, the chi-squared test succeeds in measuring the cell dependencies in a 2x2 contingency table. However, it can be misleading in cases of bigger contingency tables. We will give some illustrative examples based on those presented in [1]. We will also propose a more appropriate reliability measure of association rules.