Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling

Bone loss around femoral hip stems is one of the problems threatening the long‐term fixation of uncemented stems. Many believe that this phenomenon is caused by reduced stresses in the bone (stress shielding). In the present study the mechanical consequences of different femoral stem materials were investigated using adaptive bone remodeling theory in combination with the finite element method. Bone‐remodeling in the femur around the implant and interface stresses between bone and implant were investigated for fully bonded femoral stems. Cemented stems (cobalt‐chrome or titanium alloy) caused less bone resorption and lower interface stresses than uncemented stems made from the same materials. The range of the bone resorption predicted in the simulation models was from 23% in the proximal medial cortex surrounding the cemented titanium alloy stem to 76% in the proximal medial cortex around the uncemented cobalt‐chrome stem. Very little bone resorption was predicted around a flexible, uncemented “iso‐elastic” stem, but the proximal interface stresses increased drastically relative to the stiffer uncemented stems composed of cobalt‐chrome or titanium alloy. However, the proximal interface stress peak was reduced and shifted during the adaptive remodeling process. The latter was found particularly in the stiffer uncemented cobalt‐chrome‐molybdenum implant and less for the flexible isoelastic implant.

[1]  A. Rosenberg Cementless total hip arthroplasty: femoral remodeling and clinical experience. , 1989, Orthopedics.

[2]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Primary fit of the Lord cementless total hip. A geometric study in cadavers. , 1988, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R Huiskes,et al.  Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  C. Engh,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[7]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Fem analyses of hip prostheses: Validity of the 2-D side-plate model and the effects of torsion , 1991 .

[9]  D. Carter,et al.  Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  D. Carter,et al.  A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  H Weinans,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Orthopedics.

[12]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  A Sarmiento,et al.  Radiographic analysis of a low-modulus titanium-alloy femoral total hip component. Two to six-year follow-up. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  W. Maloney,et al.  Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  I. Jakim,et al.  RM isoelastic total hip arthroplasty , 1988 .

[16]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  H. Frost The Laws of Bone Structure , 1965 .

[18]  J. Galante,et al.  A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  R. Huiskes The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  I. Jakim,et al.  A 5-9-year follow-up study of the Sheehan total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.