Impact of Air Tightness on the Evaluation of Building Energy Performance in Lithuania

In order to fulfil the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) requirements for the reduction of energy consumption, European national requirements have been created for building envelope thermal properties and calculation methodology to determine if building energy efficiency is created. This is however not true in all methodologies. The necessity of building air tightness appears only for new A class buildings, and there are no requirements for air tightness for other building classes. Therefore, the aim of this work is to improve the methodology for the calculation of energy efficiency of buildings, while taking into account the air tightness of the buildings. In order to achieve this aim, the sum energy consumption of investigated buildings was calculated, energy efficiency classes were determined, air tightness of the buildings was measured, and reasons for insufficient air tightness were analyzed. Investigation results show that the average value of air tightness of A energy efficiency class buildings is 0.6 h −1 . The results of other investigated buildings, corresponding to B and C energy efficiency classes, show insufficient air tightness (the average n 50 value is 6 h −1 ); herewith, energy consumption for heating is higher than calculated, according to the energy efficiency methodology. This paper provides an energy performance evaluation scheme, under which performed evaluation of energy performance of buildings ensures high quality construction work, building durability, and the reliability of heat-loss calculations.

[1]  Targo Kalamees,et al.  Measured and simulated air pressure conditions in Finnish residential buildings , 2010 .

[2]  Viktor Dorer,et al.  Re-inventing air heating: Convenient and comfortable within the frame of the Passive House concept , 2005 .

[3]  Mark Richard Wilby,et al.  Towards a universal energy efficiency index for buildings , 2011 .

[4]  Kristian Fabbri,et al.  A Round Robin Test for buildings energy performance in Italy , 2010 .

[5]  Targo Kalamees,et al.  Air tightness and air leakages of new lightweight single-family detached houses in Estonia , 2007 .

[6]  Kim Bjarne Wittchen,et al.  Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) , 2013 .

[7]  Gerald A. Edgar,et al.  Problems and Solutions , 2015, Am. Math. Mon..

[8]  Josifas Parasonis,et al.  Research of low energy house design and construction opportunities in Lithuania , 2010 .

[9]  M. Airaksinen,et al.  Heating Energy and Peak-Power Demand in a Standard and Low Energy Building , 2013 .

[10]  Maria Wall,et al.  Enhanced energy conservation in houses through high performance design , 2007 .

[11]  Mark Chao,et al.  Increasing Thermal Performance and Energy Efficiency of Buildings in Russia: Problems and Solutions , 2007 .

[12]  Rachel Becker Air Leakage of Curtain Walls - Diagnostics and Remediation , 2010 .

[13]  M. N. Assimakopoulos,et al.  Air tightness measurements of residential houses in Athens, Greece , 2008 .

[14]  Wei Pan,et al.  Relationships between air-tightness and its influencing factors of post-2006 new-build dwellings in the UK , 2010 .

[15]  Sami Siikanen,et al.  Improvement of energy efficiency: the use of thermography and air-tightness test in verification of thermal performance of school buildings , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  Antonio Pietro Francesco Andaloro,et al.  Energy certification of buildings: A comparative analysis of progress towards implementation in European countries , 2010 .