The Institutional Logic of Harmonization: Local Versus Global Perspectives

Perspectives in organizations differ to which extent information systems (IS) should be tailored towards local (e.g., business unit) needs or toward organization-wide, global goals (e.g., synergies, integration). For contributing to overall IS performance success, the harmonization of different perspectives becomes essential. While many scholars have highlighted the role of IS management approaches, institutional studies argue that harmonization is not solely the result of managerial action, but a consequence of institutional pressures that guide organizational decision-making. In the paper at hand, we follow the call for adopting institutional theory on the intra-organizational level of analysis and study the logic of attaining harmonization along institutional pressures. By means of a revelatory case study, we find harmonization attained in a dynamic interplay between different institutional pressures. Mimetic pressures influence normative pressures, which in turn influence coercive pressures. Our findings as well as our implications for enterprise engineering guide prospective research in studying the attainment of harmonization through an institutional lens.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[2]  Sanjay Gosain,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , 2017 .

[4]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[5]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Václav Rajlich,et al.  Changing the paradigm of software engineering , 2006, CACM.

[7]  Ryan Peterson,et al.  Crafting Information Technology Governance , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[8]  Annemette Kjærgaard,et al.  Using institutional theory with sensemaking theory: a case study of information system implementation in healthcare , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Sybren de Kinderen,et al.  Organizational Subcultures and Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness: Findings from a Case Study at a European Airport Company , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[10]  Andreas I. Nicolaou Social control in information systems development , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[11]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Enterprise transformation , 2006, CACM.

[12]  András Tilcsik,et al.  From Ritual to Reality: Demography, Ideology, and Decoupling in a Post-Communist Government Agency , 2010 .

[13]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  W. Chismar,et al.  The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry , 2007 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Organizational Buyers' Adoption and Use of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: Efficiency- and Legitimacy-Oriented Perspectives , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[18]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[20]  Shaila M. Miranda,et al.  Professional Versus Political Contexts: Institutional Mitigation and the Transaction Cost Heuristic in Information Systems Outsourcing , 2006, MIS Q..

[21]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[22]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Causal Explanation in the Coordinating Process: A Critical Realist Case Study of Federated IT Governance Structures , 2013, MIS Q..

[23]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[24]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[25]  Daniel Robey,et al.  The social shaping of electronic metals exchanges: an institutional theory perspective , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[26]  L. Zucker The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[27]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[28]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[29]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[30]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[31]  Ping Wang,et al.  Launching professional services automation: Institutional entrepreneurship for information technology innovations , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[32]  Sue Newell,et al.  Theorization and Translation in Information Technology Institutionalization: Evidence from Danish Home Care , 2014, MIS Q..

[33]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[34]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[35]  Marlies van Steenbergen Maturity and effectiveness of enterprise architecture , 2011 .

[36]  Juan Almandoz,et al.  Arriving at the Starting Line: The Impact of Community and Financial Logics on New Banking Ventures , 2012 .

[37]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[40]  Jan A. P. Hoogervorst,et al.  Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering , 2009, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[41]  Sybren de Kinderen,et al.  The Impact of Cultural Differences on Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness: a Case Study , 2014, MCIS.

[42]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  The Ecology of Standards Processes: Insights from Internet Standard Making , 2006, MIS Q..

[43]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Assimilation of Interorganizational Business Process Standards , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Anne-Claire Pache,et al.  Embedded in Hybrid Contexts: How Individuals in Organizations Respond to Competing Institutional Logics , 2013 .

[45]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..