3D Simulation of bubbling fluidized bed reactors for sorption enhanced steam methane reforming processes

Abstract Hydrogen production by the Sorption Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming (SE-SMR) process was studied with a numerical two-fluid model. The process was simulated in a three dimensional bubbling fluidized bed reactor. The effects of pressure, steam-to-carbon ratio and inlet gas flow rate on the reactions are studied. High pressure and low steam-to-carbon ratio will decrease the conversion of methane. But the high pressure makes the adsorption of CO2 faster. Compared to the standard SMR process, the methane conversion and heat utility are enhanced by CO2 adsorption. The CO2 produced in the methane reforming process is adsorbed almost totally in a relative long period of time in the bubbling fluidized bed. It means that the adsorption rate of CO2 is fast enough compared with the SMR rate. In a certain range of gas flow rates, the mass transfer and reaction kinetics can reach the equilibrium, and the reaction efficiency is independent of gas flow rate. The temperature distribution is almost uniform over the whole reactor.

[1]  Prabhu R. Nott,et al.  Frictional–collisional equations of motion for participate flows and their application to chutes , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  E. R. Gerhard,et al.  Kinetics of the Methane-Steam Reaction , 1975 .

[3]  H. Al-Qahtani.  Effect of ageing on a steam reforming catalyst , 1997 .

[4]  W. Akers,et al.  Kinetics of the methane‐steam reaction , 1955 .

[5]  Jeffrey Raymond Hufton,et al.  Sorption‐enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production , 1999 .

[6]  De Chen,et al.  Sorption enhanced hydrogen production by steam methane reforming using Li2ZrO3 as sorbent: Sorption kinetics and reactor simulation , 2005 .

[7]  Wang Lai Yoon,et al.  Modeling and simulation for the methane steam reforming enhanced by in situ CO2 removal utilizing the CaO carbonation for H2 production , 2004 .

[8]  Madhava Syamlal,et al.  Extension of Hill–Koch–Ladd drag correlation over all ranges of Reynolds number and solids volume fraction , 2006 .

[9]  H. Wagner,et al.  Hydrodynamic simulations of laboratory scale bubble columns fundamental studies of the Eulerian–Eulerian modelling approach , 1999 .

[10]  Sankaran Sundaresan,et al.  Gas-particle flow in a duct of arbitrary inclination with particle-particle interactions , 1993 .

[11]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  An equation of state for dense rigid sphere gases , 1986 .

[12]  D. Borio,et al.  Kinetic evaluation of carbon formation in a membrane reactor for methane reforming , 2007 .

[13]  Yulong Ding,et al.  Adsorption-enhanced steam–methane reforming , 2000 .

[14]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Determination of intrinsic rate constants of the CaO–CO2 reaction , 2008 .

[15]  R. Hughes,et al.  The kinetics of methane steam reforming over a Ni/α-Al2O catalyst , 2001 .

[16]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  Novel Circulating Fluidized-Bed Membrane Reformer Using Carbon Dioxide Sequestration , 2004 .

[17]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Hydrogen Production by Sorption-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Using Lithium Oxides as CO2-Acceptor , 2007 .

[18]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Sorption-enhanced reaction process with reactive regeneration , 2002 .

[19]  J. Grace,et al.  Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as CO2-acceptor , 2006 .

[20]  J. Carlos Abanades,et al.  CO2 Capture Capacity of CaO in Long Series of Carbonation/Calcination Cycles , 2006 .

[21]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO , 2004 .

[22]  Ningsheng Cai,et al.  Modeling of Multiple Cycles for Sorption-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming and Sorbent Regeneration in Fixed Bed Reactor , 2007 .

[23]  Ningsheng Cai,et al.  Continuous Production of Hydrogen from Sorption-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming in Two Parallel Fixed-Bed Reactors Operated in a Cyclic Manner , 2006 .

[24]  Y. S. Lin,et al.  Kinetics of carbon dioxide sorption on potassium-doped lithium zirconate , 2003 .

[25]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Analysis of a frictional-kinetic model for gas-particle flow , 2003 .

[26]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Critical comparison of hydrodynamic models for gas-solid fluidized beds - Part I: bubbling gas-solid fludized beds operated with a jet , 2005 .

[27]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  Chemical Reactor Modeling: Multiphase Reactive Flows , 2008 .

[29]  Paola Helena Barros Zarante,et al.  Evaluating carbon emissions reduction by use of natural gas as engine fuel , 2009 .

[30]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Sorption Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Using Li2ZrO3 as CO2-acceptor , 2007 .

[31]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Practical validation of the two-fluid model applied to dense gas-solid flows in fluidized beds , 2007 .

[32]  Douglas P. Harrison,et al.  Hydrogen Production Using Sorption-Enhanced Reaction , 2001 .

[33]  A. L. Ortíz,et al.  Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process , 1999 .

[34]  J. Jenkins,et al.  A theory for the rapid flow of identical, smooth, nearly elastic, spherical particles , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[35]  K. Yi,et al.  Low-Pressure Sorption-Enhanced Hydrogen Production , 2005 .

[36]  John R. Grace,et al.  Modeling of Sorption-Enhanced Steam Reforming in a Dual Fluidized Bubbling Bed Reactor , 2006 .

[37]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Sorption Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Process Performance and Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor Design Analysis by Use of a Two-Fluid Model , 2009 .

[38]  He Yurong,et al.  Computer simulations of gas–solid flow in spouted beds using kinetic–frictional stress model of granular flow , 2004 .

[39]  Robin W. Hughes,et al.  Improved Long-Term Conversion of Limestone-Derived Sorbents for In Situ Capture of CO2 in a Fluidized Bed Combustor , 2004 .

[40]  A. J. Assis,et al.  Hydrogen production from methane reforming: Thermodynamic assessment and autothermal reactor design , 2009 .

[41]  Ulrich Renz,et al.  Eulerian simulation of bubble formation at a jet in a two-dimensional fluidized bed , 1997 .

[42]  Douglas P. Harrison,et al.  Simultaneous shift reaction and carbon dioxide separation for the direct production of hydrogen , 1994 .

[43]  D. Gunn.  Transfer of heat or mass to particles in fixed and fluidised beds , 1978 .

[44]  J. Giddings,et al.  NEW METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF BINARY GAS-PHASE DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS , 1966 .

[45]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Particle design and evaluation of dry CO2 recovery sorbent with a liquid holding capability , 2005 .

[46]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .