Measuring Non-native Speakers’ Proficiency of English by Using a Test with Automatically-Generated Fill-in-the-Blank Questions

This paper proposes the automatic generation of Fill-in-the-Blank Questions (FBQs) together with testing based on Item Response Theory (IRT) to measure English proficiency. First, the proposal generates an FBQ from a given sentence in English. The position of a blank in the sentence is determined, and the word at that position is considered as the correct choice. The candidates for incorrect choices for the blank are hypothesized through a thesaurus. Then, each of the candidates is verified by using the Web. Finally, the blanked sentence, the correct choice and the incorrect choices surviving the verification are together laid out to form the FBQ. Second, the proficiency of non-native speakers who took the test consisting of such FBQs is estimated through IRT. Our experimental results suggest that: (1) the generated questions plus IRT estimate the non-native speakers' English proficiency; (2) while on the other hand, the test can be completed almost perfectly by English native speakers; and (3) the number of questions can be reduced by using item information in IRT. The proposed method provides teachers and testers with a tool that reduces time and expenditure for testing English proficiency.

[1]  Anne Wichmann,et al.  Teaching and Language Corpora , 1997 .

[2]  J. D. Brown What are the characteristics of natural cloze tests? , 1993 .

[3]  均 井佐原,et al.  Investigation into Language Learners' Acquisition Order Based on an Error Analysis of a Learner Corpus , 2005 .

[4]  Beata Beigman Klebanov,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring , 2021, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies.

[5]  R. Mitkov,et al.  Computer-Aided Generation of Multiple-Choice Tests , 2003, International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 2003.

[6]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on the Web as Corpus , 2003, CL.

[7]  Satoshi Sato,et al.  Answer validation by keyword association , 2004 .

[8]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer , 2000 .

[9]  Leonard S. Cahen,et al.  Educational Testing Service , 1970 .

[10]  Peter D. Turney Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL , 2001, ECML.

[11]  P. Fayers Item Response Theory for Psychologists , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  Eiichiro Sumita,et al.  Creating corpora for speech-to-speech translation , 2003, INTERSPEECH.

[13]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (second edition) , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  Genichiro Kikui,et al.  Automatic Measuring of English Language Proficiency using MT Evaluation Technology , 2004 .

[15]  James Fleming,et al.  English as a Global language , 1998, Crossings: A Journal of English Studies.