Hydraulic fracture propagation direction during volume fracturing in unconventional reservoirs

Abstract Creating an artificial fracture network by hydraulic fracturing plays the most important role in unconventional oil and gas development. The propagation direction of a fracture is the base to understand the mechanism of forming a fracture network. For size limitation, the fracture propagation direction has not been well studied in labs. In this paper, a comprehensive numerical model is developed to study the fracture propagation direction during volume fracturing of unconventional reservoirs. The model is based on elastic and fracturing mechanics of a rock, as well as the maximum circumferential stress criterion and boundary element method. Simulated results prove that, the propagation direction of a hydraulic fracture is affected by formation in-situ stresses, hydraulic pressure in the fracture and the initial azimuth of the fracture. An H factor is proposed to evaluate the combined effect of those factors, and proved mathematically and numerically that it is a major factor controlling a fracture propagation direction. Fractures will follow the same propagation path if the H factor keeps constant for different stresses and pressure combination. A fracture will follow the direction of the in-situ maximum principal stress as the applied internal hydraulic pressure in the fracture is less than the maximum stress, otherwise, the fracture will try to follow its initial azimuth and yield a propagation direction path between its initial azimuth and the direction of the in-situ maximum principal stress. The work is helpful in understanding the forming process of a complex fracture network during hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs. The H factor is useful in reducing both lab test and numerical simulation times, making lab tests of fracture extension at high stresses and pressure viable.

[1]  Ali Daneshy,et al.  Off-Balance Growth: A New Concept in Hydraulic Fracturing , 2003 .

[2]  Yueming Cheng,et al.  Impacts of the Number of Perforation Clusters and Cluster Spacing on Production Performance of Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells , 2012 .

[3]  FreezeFrac Improves the Productivity of Gas Shales , 2013 .

[4]  Yoichi Sumi,et al.  Morphological aspects of fatigue crack propagation Part I—Computational procedure , 1996 .

[5]  Lyle V. Lehman,et al.  Survey of More Than 1,000 Fracture Stage Database With Net Pressure in the Barnett Shale. Part 2 , 2011 .

[6]  F. Erdogan,et al.  On the Crack Extension in Plates Under Plane Loading and Transverse Shear , 1963 .

[7]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  What Is Stimulated Reservoir Volume , 2010 .

[8]  Roger Smith,et al.  A finite element model for the shape development of irregular planar cracks , 1989 .

[9]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  Crack growth resistance characterized by the strain energy density function , 1983 .

[10]  Michael Alber,et al.  Hydraulic and Sleeve Fracturing Laboratory Experiments on 6 Rock Types , 2013 .

[11]  Zhou Desheng,et al.  Induced Stress and Interaction of Fractures During Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Formation , 2015 .

[12]  Pericles S. Theocaris,et al.  Authors' closure on the discussion by G. C. Sih, E. T. Moyer Jr. and E. E. Gdoutos of “the mises elastic-plastic boundary as the core region in fracture criteria” , 1984 .

[13]  Yueming Cheng Mechanical Interaction of Multiple Fractures--Exploring Impacts of the Selection of the Spacing/Number of Perforation Clusters on Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells , 2012 .

[14]  Subhash N. Shah,et al.  Breakdown Pressure Determination - A Fracture Mechanics Approach , 2013 .

[15]  Q. Gao,et al.  Characterization of Stress-field Variation on Subsurface Faults in Surrounding Areas of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2013 .

[16]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing Fracture Conductivity , 2009 .