Aerodynamic Performance Modification of the Stingray UAV at Low Angles of Attack

Active flow control using fluidic actuators, via synthetic jets and steady blowing jets, was used to provide control power for trimming the Stingray UAV in the longitudinal (pitch) and lateral (roll) directions at low angles of attack. Using this technique, the pitching and roll moments were altered such that the effect is similar to that of a deflection of conventional control effectors in trim. The control effectiveness of the flow control on the aerodynamic performance of the Stingray UAV was investigated experimentally in a wind tunnel. Global flow measurements were conducted, where the moments and forces on the vehicle were measured using a six component sting balance. The effect of the actuation was also examined on the surface static pressure at two spanwise locations. In addition, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique was used to quantify the velocity vector field over the model, both the global flow field as well as the localized interaction domain near the synthetic jet orifice. The synthetic jets were able to alter the local streamlines through the formation of a quasi-steady interaction region on the suction surface of the Stingray UAV’s wing. Phase locked PIV data was acquired to provide insight into the growth, propagation, and decay of the synthetic jet impulse and its interaction with the cross-flow. The changes induced on the moments and forces can be proportionally controlled by either changing the momentum coefficient or by driving the synthetic jets with a pulse modulation waveform. This can lead the way for future development of closed-loop control models.

[1]  Michael Amitay,et al.  Virtual Aerodynamic Shape Modification at Low Angles of Attack using Synthetic Jet Actuators , 2001 .

[2]  Jean Delery,et al.  Research into vortex breakdown control , 2001 .

[3]  M. Amitay,et al.  Virtual aero-shaping of a Clark-Y airfoil using synthetic jet actuators , 2001 .

[4]  M. Amitay,et al.  Role of Actuation Frequency in Controlled Flow Reattachment over a Stalled Airfoil , 2002 .

[5]  M. Amitay,et al.  Aerodynamic Flow Control over an Unconventional Airfoil Using Synthetic Jet Actuators , 2001 .

[6]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Active Flow Control on the STINGRAY UAV: Transient Behavior , 2003 .

[7]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Active Flow Control on the Stingray Uninhabited Air Vehicle: Transient Behaviour , 2004 .

[8]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  Delay of Airfoil Stall by Periodic Excitation , 1996 .

[9]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  The forced mixing layer between parallel streams , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  Flight Control Using Synthetic Jets on a Cessna 182 Model , 2007 .

[11]  M. Amitay,et al.  Evolution of finite span synthetic jets , 2006 .

[12]  M. Amitay,et al.  Flow transients induced on a 2D airfoil by pulse-modulated actuation , 2006 .

[13]  K. Ahuja,et al.  Control of flow separation by sound , 1984 .

[14]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Active Flow Control on the STINGRAY UAV: Physical Mechanisms , 2004 .

[15]  P. Mandl Effect of standing vortex on flow about suction aerofoils with split flaps , 1959 .

[16]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Perturbed Free Shear Layers , 1984 .