Logistics and Postharvest Handling of Locally Grown Produce

Publisher Summary The aim of the postharvest handling of locally grown produce is to deliver quality produce to the consumer. Quality cannot be improved after harvesting; therefore it is important to harvest fruits and vegetables at the proper stage, size, and at optimal quality. Postharvest life, however, can be maintained and extended by optimized handling and reducing damage through the application of correct postharvesting techniques. Quality is the result of the interaction among many factors including produce, consumer perceptions, distribution, and postharvest handling systems. The legislation and regulations applied to the quality and safety assurance of FFVs (fresh fruits and vegetables) also have an impact on produce quality at sales point. The main issues for consumers are what product the consumer wants, and how much the consumer is willing to pay for it. Consumer expectation should be met through the implementation of adequate logistic and postharvest handling techniques. Although it is tempting to meet the needs of all consumers in a market, an effective strategy identifies those characteristics important to a distinct segment. This also applies to locally-grown FFVs. However, the logistic question remains: Whether it is possible to provide the volume requested at the right time, in the right place, in the right quality, and at the right price. The adequate postharvest handling of FFVs must account for the cultural, economic, technological, environmental, administrative, and legal context of the target market.

[1]  Linus U. Opara,et al.  Traceability in postharvest quality management , 2006 .

[2]  Stanley E. Prussia,et al.  SYSTEMS THINKING FOR FOOD SUPPLY CHAINS: FRESH PRODUCE APPLICATIONS , 2006 .

[3]  C. Hinrichs,et al.  Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market☆ , 2000 .

[4]  B. Borsari Fruit and Vegetable Quality Perspective from Producers and Consumers at a Local University in Western Pennsylvania , 2003 .

[5]  Bonnie J Horrigan,et al.  Health care without harm. , 2005, Explore.

[6]  Julian A. Heyes POST-HARVEST ACTION: THE GLOBAL POSTHARVEST FORUM , 2003 .

[7]  Matthew Buck A Guide to Developing a Sustainable Food Purchasing Policy. , 2007 .

[8]  Peter Batt,et al.  PRICE-QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FRESH PRODUCE INDUSTRY IN BALI , 2000 .

[9]  Gary Huber,et al.  Local food connections: From farms to restaurants , 2004 .

[10]  L.J.C.M. Peeters IMPLEMENTATION OF FOOD SAFETY STANDARDS IN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES COOPERATION , 2007 .

[11]  Patrizia Busato,et al.  FruitGame: Simulation Model to Study the Supply Chain Logistics for Fresh Produce , 2006 .

[12]  R. L. Shewfelt Defining and meeting consumer requirements , 2006 .

[13]  L. M. Carvajal,et al.  Design of a protocol for handling perishable food products using papaya as the model system , 2005 .

[14]  M'hand Fares,et al.  From public to private safety regulation? The case of negotiated agreements in the French fresh produce import industry , 2007 .

[15]  Wojciech J. Florkowski,et al.  MANAGEMENT SIMULATION GAME FOR IMPROVING FOOD CHAINS , 2001 .

[16]  B. Brueckner Addressing consumer notions and individuality , 2006 .

[17]  M. Piñeiro,et al.  IMPROVING THE SAFETY AND QUALITY OF FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES (FFV): A PRACTICAL APPROACH , 2007 .

[18]  Christina Fjellström,et al.  Food culture as a political tool : meal construction during the Swedish EU chairmanship 2001 , 2003 .

[19]  Jane Grimsbo Jewett,et al.  Marketing Local Food , 2007 .

[20]  R. Berruto,et al.  HYBRID MODELLING FOR FRUIT QUALITY PREDICTION IN SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS , 2003 .

[21]  Chau N. Nguyen,et al.  Evaluation of the Technical and Economical Feasibilities of a Suspended Wagon for Transporting Fresh Peaches from the Field to the Packinghouse , 2004 .

[22]  Tiziana Nasolini,et al.  Frutta Snack, merende anti obesità si affermano nelle scuole italiane , 2007 .

[23]  Mircea Enachescu Dauthy,et al.  Fruit and Vegetable Processing , 1995 .

[24]  Lucie Sirieix,et al.  Consumers and Food Miles , 2007 .

[25]  W. Lockeretz,et al.  The load less traveled: examining the potential of using food miles and CO2 emissions in ecolabels. , 2002 .

[26]  Adel A. Kader,et al.  Small-scale postharvest handling practices. A manual for horticultural crops. , 1993 .

[27]  Catherine Strohbehn,et al.  CASE STUDIES OF LOCAL FOOD PURCHASING BY CENTRAL IOWA RESTAURANTS AND INSTITUTIONS , 2003 .

[28]  P. S. Birthal,et al.  Smallholder Farmers' Access to Markets for High-Value Agricultural Commodities in India , 2007 .

[29]  Alan Campbell McKinnon,et al.  The validity of food miles as an indicator of sustainable development - final report , 2005 .

[30]  Trevor Suslow,et al.  Postharvest Handling for Organic Crops , 2000 .

[31]  Garry Auld,et al.  Sustaining local agriculture Barriers and opportunities to direct marketing between farms and restaurants in Colorado , 2003 .

[32]  Tom Johnston,et al.  Agriculture in the City's Countryside , 1991 .

[33]  Patrizia Busato,et al.  FruitGame: A Simulation Tool to Evaluate Supply Chain Logistics and the Effects of Information Sharing for Fresh Produce , 2007 .

[34]  Errol W. Hewett,et al.  An overview of preharvest factors influencing postharvest quality of horticultural products , 2006 .

[35]  Bruno Borsari,et al.  Students' attitudes about fruit and vegetable quality at slippery rock university of pennsylvania , 2005 .

[36]  Erica Phillips The Growing Trend of Farmers' Markets in the United States , 2007 .

[37]  Linus U. Opara,et al.  Traceability in agriculture and food supply chain: A review of basic concepts, technological implications, and future prospects , 2002 .

[38]  George E. Boyhan,et al.  Postharvest handling and transportation of fruits and vegetables , 2009 .

[39]  Peter Batt,et al.  FULFILLING CUSTOMER NEEDS IN AGRIBUSINESS SUPPLY CHAINS , 2006 .

[40]  Jean Marie Codron,et al.  Pesticides residues controls on fresh produce: Negotiated agreements in the French import industry [Le contrôle sanitaire des fruits et légumes: les conventions d’autocontrôle des importateurs français] , 2006 .

[41]  R. Pirog,et al.  Checking the Food Odometer: Comparing Food Miles for Local versus Conventional Produce Sales to Iowa Institutions , 2003 .

[42]  R. E. Hardenburg,et al.  The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks , 1986 .

[43]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Environmentally sustainable food production and marketing: Opportunity or hype? , 2006 .

[44]  Wojciech J. Florkowski,et al.  PREDICTING FRESH PRODUCE QUALITY IN SUPPLY CHAINS , 2003 .

[45]  S. Udas,et al.  Assessment of postharvest handling systems of vegetables in the eastern hills of Nepal , 2005 .

[46]  Maximo Torero,et al.  Market institutions: Enhancing the Value of Rural-Urban Links , 2005 .

[47]  R. L. Shewfelt,et al.  The future of quality , 2003 .

[48]  Patrizia Busato,et al.  Learning Ordering Rules for Perishable Fresh Produce: an Exercise in Integrating Optimization and Simulation , 2008 .

[49]  Ray Collins The Function and Consequences of Alternative Fresh Produce Supply Chain Models , 2006 .

[50]  Madeleine E. Pullman,et al.  UNRAVELING THE FOOD SUPPLY CHAIN: STRATEGIC INSIGHTS FROM CHINA AND THE 2007 RECALLS* , 2008 .

[51]  Adel A. Kader,et al.  Increasing Food Availability by Reducing Postharvest Losses of Fresh Produce , 2005 .