The Effect of Decision Strategy on Deciding to Defer Choice

Recent research has examined consumer decision making when the option of not choosing any of the alternatives is also provided. The findings from this research suggest that the decision to defer choice is sensitive to the uncertainty of choosing the most preferred option from the set of alternatives provided. Building on this research, the author tests whether the decision to defer choice is also influenced by task variables that influence decision uncertainty. In the first experiment, this proposition is tested for choice problems in which information on three relatively equally attractive alternatives is presented either sequentially or simultaneously. As predicted, the preference for the defer-choice option was greater when the three alternatives were presented simultaneously. A second study forced subjects into using one of four decision strategies in order to choose between two nondominated alternatives. The preference for the no-choice option was found to be higher when the rule required explicit attribute tradeoffs and lower when it simplified choice. These results suggest that choice uncertainty is influenced by the decision strategy used to determine the preference among alternatives. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of the results for marketers’ communication strategies.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[2]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[3]  Charles A. Kiesler,et al.  Conflict and Number of Choice Alternatives , 1966 .

[4]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[5]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[6]  W. Ickes,et al.  The effect of objective self-awareness on predecisional exposure to information , 1972 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[8]  Peter Wright.  Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing , 1975 .

[9]  Folke Ölander,et al.  Search Behavior in Non-Simultaneous Choice Situations: Satisficing or Maximizing? , 1975 .

[10]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies , 1977 .

[11]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Attractiveness of decision rules , 1980 .

[12]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Joshua Klayman,et al.  Children's decision strategies and their adaptation to task characteristics , 1985 .

[14]  Dan Zakay,et al.  Post-decisional confidence and conflict experienced in a choice process , 1985 .

[15]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  New directions in research on decision making , 1986 .

[16]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  Judgment as a component decision process for choosing between sequentially available alternatives , 1986 .

[17]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  What Makes You So Sure? Effects of Epistemic Motivations on judgmental Confidence , 1987 .

[18]  M. Holbrook.  What Is Consumer Research , 1987 .

[19]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[20]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Differential predictability of preferences and choices , 1989 .

[21]  H. Montgomery.  From cognition to action: The search for dominance in decision making. , 1989 .

[22]  Joel Huber,et al.  Adapting Cutoffs to the Choice Environment: The Effects of Attribute Correlation and Reliability , 1991 .

[23]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Process and structure in human decision making , 1992 .

[24]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[26]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[27]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[28]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Correlation, conflict, and choice , 1993 .

[29]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  The impact of using forced decision‐making strategies on post‐decisional confidence , 1993 .

[30]  Ayzerman,et al.  Theory of choice , 1995 .

[31]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making , 1995 .