Encrypted objects and decryption processes: problem-solving with functions in a learning environment based on cryptography

This paper introduces an applied problem-solving task, set in the context of cryptography and embedded in a network of computer-based tools. This designed learning environment engaged students in a series of collaborative problem-solving activities intended to introduce the topic of functions through a set of linked representations. In a classroom-based study, students were asked to imagine themselves as cryptanalysts, and to collaborate with the other members of their small group on a series of increasingly difficult problem-solving tasks over several sessions. These tasks involved decrypting text messages that had been encrypted using polynomial functions as substitution ciphers. Drawing on the distinction between viewing functions as processes and as objects, the paper presents a detailed analysis of two groups’ developing fluency with regard to these tasks, and of the aspects of the function concept underlying their problem-solving approaches. Results of this study indicated that different levels of expertise with regard to the task environment reflected and required different aspects of functions, and thus represented distinct opportunities to engage those different aspects of the function concept.

[1]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[2]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit , 1994 .

[3]  J. Boaler Encouraging the transfer of ‘school’ mathematics to the ‘real world’ through the integration of process and content, context and culture , 1993 .

[4]  A. Sfard On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin , 1991 .

[5]  Tobin White Debugging an Artifact, Instrumenting a Bug: Dialectics of Instrumentation and Design in Technology-Rich Learning Environments , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[6]  Brian R. O'Callaghan Computer-Intensive Algebra and Students' Conceptual Knowledge of Functions. , 1998 .

[7]  Dor Abrahamson,et al.  Embodied design: constructing means for constructing meaning , 2009 .

[8]  Michal Yerushalmy,et al.  Research on the Role of Technological Environments in Algebra Learning and Teaching , 2004 .

[9]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  Students, Functions, and the Undergraduate Curriculum † , 1994 .

[10]  B. Schwarz,et al.  New actions upon old objects: A new ontological perspective on functions , 1995 .

[11]  Carolyn Kieran The learning and teaching of school algebra. , 1992 .

[12]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy [MAA Notes, Volume 25] , 1992 .

[13]  David Tall,et al.  Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity , 1981 .

[14]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[15]  David Tall,et al.  Ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic , 1983 .

[16]  David Slavit,et al.  An Alternate Route to the Reification of Function , 1997 .

[17]  David Tall,et al.  Relationships between embodied objects and symbolic procepts: an explanatory theory of success and failure in mathematics , 2004 .

[18]  Douglas N. Gordin,et al.  Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. , 2000, The Future of children.

[19]  Mike Thomas,et al.  What is the object of the encapsulation of a process , 1999 .

[20]  V.F. Kleist,et al.  The code book: the science of secrecy from ancient egypt to quantum cryptography [Book Review] , 2002, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[21]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[22]  Anna Sfard,et al.  Problems of Reification: Representations and Mathematical Objects , 1994 .