On the Conditional Cueing of Credibility Heuristics

When seeking information, Internet users often find multiple communicators co-presenting and expressing their opinions. This study examined how people judge message senders’ credibility in a multi-source environment based on system-generated cues, the consensus among multiple sources, and the effect of receiver’s familiarity with the online platform. Moreover, this research examined the mediating role of source credibility in attitude change in an online consumer-review community. Results indicated that users familiar with a platform were more likely to use system-generated cues for their judgment of credibility along with consensus heuristics, and the combination of heuristics influenced attitude through credibility. However, unfamiliar users relied on consensus heuristics but not system-generated cues. These findings and their theoretical implications are discussed.

[1]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Effects of Online Health Sources on Credibility and Behavioral Intentions , 2010, Commun. Res..

[3]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Evaluating the Wisdom of Strangers: The Perceived Credibility of Online Consumer Reviews on Yelp , 2015, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification , 2007 .

[5]  W. Joseph,et al.  The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review , 1982 .

[6]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility , 2000 .

[7]  Alexander P. Schouten,et al.  The Effects of Other-Generated and System-Generated Cues on Adolescents' Perceived Attractiveness on Social Network Sites , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Michael Burgoon,et al.  An Empirical Test of a Model of Resistance to Persuasion. , 1978 .

[9]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[10]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[11]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics , 2013 .

[12]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  X. Zhang,et al.  Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics , 2010 .

[14]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[15]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Behaviors, Persuasion, and Credibility , 1990 .

[16]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009, Commun. Res..

[17]  David C. DeAndrea,et al.  Advancing Warranting Theory , 2014 .

[18]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  COVARIATION AND CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION - A LOGICAL MODEL OF THE INTUITIVE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE , 1987 .

[20]  Pamela J. Shoemaker,et al.  How to Build Social Science Theories , 2003 .

[21]  Cheol Park,et al.  Factors Influencing eWOM Effects: Using Experience, Credibility, and Susceptibility , 2011 .

[22]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  The Formation of Physician Impressions in Online Communities , 2016, Commun. Res..

[23]  Ji Young Lee,et al.  To Tweet or to Retweet? That Is the Question for Health Professionals on Twitter , 2013, Health communication.

[24]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[25]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Vicarious functioning reconsidered: A fast and frugal lens model , 2001 .

[26]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Social Media as Information Source: Recency of Updates and Credibility of Information , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online , 2010 .

[28]  S. Sundar.  The MAIN Model : A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility , 2007 .

[29]  G. O'Neal,et al.  Effects of Clothing as Nonverbal Communication on Credibility of the Message Source , 1991 .

[30]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[31]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[32]  Carmen Herrero,et al.  Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility. , 2003, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[33]  Erin M. Schumaker,et al.  The Effects of Verbal Versus Photographic Self‐Presentation on Impression Formation in Facebook , 2012 .

[34]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[35]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Authority vs. peer: how interface cues influence users , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[36]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[37]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  The effects of product photographs and reputation systems on consumer behavior and product cost on eBay , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[40]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[41]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2003 .

[42]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[43]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change , 1982 .

[44]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement , 1999 .