No need to stop: exploring smartphone interaction paradigms while cycling

Current apps for cyclists follow the "stop-to-interact" paradigm, neglecting that people interact with their smartphones in motion. We conducted two studies to explore paradigms for interaction that can be applied while cycling. In an enactment study, participants freely explored movements suitable for interaction while using a bicycle trainer and discussed respective requirements and constraints. The analysis of the interaction movements and the group discussion showed that users preferred to keep their hands on the handlebars while performing subtle gestures with their fingers. Based on this we performed an outdoor study focused on interacting with a smartphone game while riding a bicycle, using three interaction options: buttons on the handlebars, the phone's touchscreen, and a wristband activated by flipping the wrist. Using buttons resulted in a significantly lower physical demand and significantly lower frustration compared to the other alternatives, as well as better task performance compared to interacting using the wristband.

[1]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  Smart flashlight: map navigation using a bike-mounted projector , 2014, CHI.

[2]  Gernot Bauer,et al.  Supporting safety in cycling groups using LED-augmented gestures , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.

[3]  Dick de Waard,et al.  More screen operation than calling: the results of observing cyclists' behaviour while using mobile phones. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Tacticycle: a tactile display for supporting tourists on a bicycle trip , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[5]  Joe Marshall,et al.  Interaction in Motion: Designing Truly Mobile Interaction , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[6]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  Gesture Bike: Examining Projection Surfaces and Turn Signal Systems for Urban Cycling , 2015, ITS.

[7]  Sang Ho Yoon,et al.  BikeGesture: User Elicitation and Performance of Micro Hand Gesture as Input for Cycling , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Joe Marshall,et al.  Mobile interaction does not exist , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Joe Marshall,et al.  Ubikequitous computing: designing interactive experiences for cyclists , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[10]  Amon Rapp,et al.  Wearable accessories for cycling: tracking memories in urban spaces , 2013, UbiComp.

[11]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of operating a touch screen smartphone and other common activities performed while bicycling on cycling behaviour , 2014 .

[12]  Julian de Hoog,et al.  Exploring Human: eBike Interaction to Support Rider Autonomy , 2016, CHI PLAY.

[13]  P. Hancock,et al.  Estimation of Duration and Mental Workload at Differing Times of Day by Males and Females , 1988 .

[14]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Enhancing outdoor navigation systems through vibrotactile feedback , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Anders Bouwer,et al.  Vibrobelt: tactile navigation support for cyclists , 2013, IUI '13.

[16]  Leah L Thompson,et al.  Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study , 2012, Injury Prevention.

[17]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[18]  Niels Ole Bernsen,et al.  WIZARD OF OZ PROTOTYPING : WHEN AND HOW ? , 1993 .

[19]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Mobile phone use while cycling: Incidence and effects on behaviour and safety , 2010, Ergonomics.

[20]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Bicyclists’ Visual Strategies When Conducting Self-Paced Vs. System-Paced Smartphone Tasks in Traffic , 2016 .

[21]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.