Infective endocarditis in Europe: lessons from the Euro heart survey

Objectives: To describe the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of active infective endocarditis (IE) in Europe. Design: Prospective survey of medical practices in Europe. Setting: 92 centres from 25 countries. Patients: The EHS (Euro heart survey) on valvar heart disease (VHD) enrolled 5001 adult patients between April and July 2001. Of those, 159 had active IE. Results: 118 patients (74%) had native IE and 41 (26%) had prosthetic IE. Mean (SD) age was 57 (16) years. Blood cultures were obtained for 113 patients (71%) before antibiotic treatment was started. Surgery was performed in 52% of patients. Reasons for surgery were heart failure in 60%, persistent sepsis in 40%, vegetation size in 48%, or embolism in 18%. Surgery was for implantation of mechanical prosthesis in 63%, bioprosthesis in 21%, aortic homograft in 5%, and valve repair in 11%. In-hospital mortality was 12.6%, being 10.4% in the medical group and 15.6% in the surgical group. Among the total population of 5001 patients, only 50% of those with native VHD had been educated on endocarditis prophylaxis and only 33% regularly attended dental follow up. Of patients with IE who had had a procedure at risk during the preceding year only 50% had received adequate prophylaxis. Conclusions: The EHS on VHD shows that patients with active IE have a high risk profile and often undergo surgery. However, there are deficiencies in obtaining blood cultures and applying prophylaxis. Mortality remains high, which is a justification for the improvement of patient management through education and the implementation of guidelines.

[1]  P. Sommer,et al.  Lysyl oxidase deficiency: a new cause of human arterial dissection , 2005, Heart.

[2]  V. Pasceri,et al.  A uncommon cause of angina during upper limb exercise. , 2004, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[3]  A. Pavie,et al.  [Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis. Executive summary]. , 2004 .

[4]  J. Pell,et al.  The debate on public place defibrillators: charged but shockingly ill informed , 2003, Heart.

[5]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. , 2003, European heart journal.

[6]  F. Alla,et al.  Changing profile of infective endocarditis: results of a 1-year survey in France. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  D Raoult,et al.  Echocardiography predicts embolic events in infective endocarditis. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  D. Mesa,et al.  Long term outcome of infective endocarditis in patients who were not drug addicts: a 10 year study , 2000, Heart.

[9]  V. Fowler,et al.  Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. , 2000, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  A. C. Yankah,et al.  Surgical treatment of active infective aortic valve endocarditis with associated periannular abscess--11 year results. , 2000, European heart journal.

[11]  D Raoult,et al.  Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  N. Frimodt-Møller,et al.  Clinical features of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a 10-year experience in Denmark. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  R. Écochard,et al.  A critical appraisal of the quality of the management of infective endocarditis. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  R. Gibbons,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[15]  A F Bolger,et al.  Prevention of bacterial endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart Association. , 1997, Circulation.

[16]  E. Cecchi,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis. A study of sensitivity and specificity. , 1997, European heart journal.

[17]  F. Loop,et al.  Is there an advantage to repairing infected mitral valves? , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  S. Bolling,et al.  Mitral valve reconstruction for active and healed endocarditis. , 1996, Circulation.

[19]  L. Olaison,et al.  Epidemiologic Aspects of Infective Endocarditis in an Urban Population: A 5‐Year Prospective Study , 1995, Medicine.

[20]  A. Evangelista,et al.  Is the clinical spectrum and prognosis of native valve infective endocarditis in non-addicts changing? , 1995, European heart journal.

[21]  A. C. Yankah,et al.  Diagnosis and surgical treatment of active infective aortic valve endocarditis with associated periannular abscess , 1995 .

[22]  C. Gohlke-Bärwolf,et al.  Prevention of bacterial endocarditis in Germany. , 1995, European heart journal.

[23]  A. Carpentier,et al.  Valve repair in acute endocarditis. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  J. Kirklin,et al.  Aortic valve endocarditis with aortic root abscess cavity: surgical treatment with aortic valve homograft. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  L. Rydén,et al.  Cardiovascular Diseases in Europe Euro Heart Survey and National Registries of Cardiovascular Diseases and Patient Management , 2006 .

[26]  A. Pavie,et al.  [Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis]. , 2004, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[27]  C. Paré,et al.  Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en valvulopatías , 2000 .

[28]  R. Schulz,et al.  Infective endocarditis in the elderly in the era of transesophageal echocardiography: clinical features and prognosis compared with younger patients. , 1996, The American journal of medicine.