Comparison of two functional independence scales with a participation measure in post-stroke rehabilitation.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Luc Noreau | Réjean Hébert | Johanne Desrosiers | Annie Rochette | J. Desrosiers | A. Rochette | G. Bravo | L. Noreau | Gina Bravo | C. Boutin | Catherine Boutin | R. Hébert | Catherine Boutin
[1] C. Granger,et al. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[2] M L Niemi,et al. Quality of life 4 years after stroke. , 1988, Stroke.
[3] J. Desrosiers,et al. Reliability of the revised functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF) for epidemiological research. , 1995, Age and ageing.
[4] P. Disler,et al. Predicting hours of care needed. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[5] C. Mulrow,et al. Estimating and testing an index of responsiveness and the relationship of the index to power. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[6] G. Norman,et al. Issues in the use of change scores in randomized trials. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[7] Marcus J. Fuhrer,et al. Rehabilitation outcomes : analysis and measurement , 1987 .
[8] C. St-Hilaire,et al. Resources and Costs Associated with Disabilities of Elderly People Living at Home and in Institutions* , 2001, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.
[9] Epidémiologie des accidents vasculaires cérébraux , 1992 .
[10] Labi Ml,et al. Psychosocial disability in physically restored long-term stroke survivors. , 1980, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[11] J. Desrosiers,et al. Comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal designs in the study of aging of upper extremity performance. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.
[12] A J Thompson,et al. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[13] A. Yelnik,et al. Construct validity of the functional independence measure (FIM): questioning the unidimensionality of the scale and the "value" of FIM scores. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[14] Carl V. Granger,et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation , 1986 .
[15] G. Guyatt,et al. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.
[16] S. Ebrahim,et al. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke , 1998 .
[17] P A Wolf,et al. Epidemiologic profile of long-term stroke disability: the Framingham study. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[18] M. Walker,et al. A randomized controlled trial of leisure rehabilitation after stroke , 1995 .
[19] M. Mullee,et al. Validation of the Frenchay Activities Index in a general population aged 16 years and older. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[20] F. Artru,et al. [Unilateral hydrocephalus caused by abscess of the choroid plexus]. , 1992, Revue neurologique (Paris).
[21] R L Hewer,et al. Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.
[22] G St-Michel,et al. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap , 1998, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.
[23] J. Whisnant,et al. Disability and use of rehabilitation services following stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1975-1979. , 1987, Stroke.
[24] Xiao-Li Meng,et al. Comparing correlated correlation coefficients , 1992 .
[25] John S. Green,et al. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.
[26] B. Sharrack,et al. The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[27] P. Duncan,et al. Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.
[28] B. Hamilton. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. , 1987 .
[29] W. Oczkowski,et al. The functional independence measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[30] D. Spiegelhalter,et al. Setting the minimal metrically detectable change on disability rating scales. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[31] Diane P. Martin,et al. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[32] P. Wood,et al. Appreciating the consequences of disease: the international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. , 1980, WHO chronicle.
[33] Lewis E. Kazis,et al. Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.
[34] M. Liang,et al. Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation , 1990, Medical care.
[35] R. Hébert,et al. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. , 1988, Age and ageing.
[36] R. Harwood,et al. Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.