Neuromimetic Control — A Linear Model Paradigm

Stylized models of the neurodynamics that underpin sensory motor control in animals are proposed and studied. The voluntary motions of animals are typically initiated by high level intentions created in the primary cortex through a combination of perceptions of the current state of the environment along with memories of past reactions to similar states. Muscle movements are produced as a result of neural processes in which the parallel activity of large multiplicities of neurons generate signals that collectively lead to desired actions. Essential to coordinated muscle movement are intentionality, prediction, regions of the cortex dealing with misperceptions of sensory cues, and a significant level of resilience with respect to disruptions in the neural pathways through which signals must propagate. While linear models of feedback control systems have been well studied over many decades, this paper proposes and analyzes a class of models whose aims are to capture some of the essential features of neural control of movement. Whereas most linear models of feedback systems entail a state component whose dimension is higher than the number of inputs or outputs, the work that follows will treat models in which the numbers of input and output channels greatly exceed the state dimension. While we begin by considering continuous-time systems governed by differential equations, the aim will be to treat systems whose evolution involves classes of inputs that emulate neural spike trains. Within the proposed class of models, the paper will study resilience to channel dropouts, the ways in which noise and uncertainty can be mitigated by an appropriate notion of consensus among noisy inputs, and finally, by simple models of predictive control in which errors are fed back to adjust the weights given to inputs from different channels.

[1]  John Baillieul,et al.  Feedback Designs in Information-Based Control , 2002 .

[2]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Feedback Control Under Data Rate Constraints: An Overview , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Deepan Muthirayan,et al.  Working Memory Augmentation for Improved Learning in Neural Adaptive Control , 2019, 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[4]  J. Baillieul,et al.  Time to Failure of Quantized Control via a Binary Symmetric Channel , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  C. Curto,et al.  Combinatorial Geometry of Threshold-Linear Networks , 2020, 2008.01032.

[6]  Thomas G. Bifano,et al.  Shaping light: MOEMS deformable mirrors for microscopes and telescopes , 2010, MOEMS-MEMS.

[7]  Lorenzo Marconi,et al.  Internal Models in Control, Biology and Neuroscience , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[8]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Efficient Visual Search of Videos Cast as Text Retrieval , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Inah Lee,et al.  Neural Firing Patterns Are More Schematic and Less Sensitive to Changes in Background Visual Scenes in the Subiculum than in the Hippocampus , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Brian Colder,et al.  Emulation as an Integrating Principle for Cognition , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  John Baillieul,et al.  Robust quantization for digital finite communication bandwidth (DFCB) control , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  A. James 2010 , 2011, Philo of Alexandria: an Annotated Bibliography 2007-2016.

[13]  John Baillieul,et al.  Perceptual Control with Large Feature and Actuator Networks , 2019, 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[14]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  John Baillieul,et al.  Data-rate requirements for nonlinear Feedback control , 2004 .

[16]  Panos J. Antsaklis,et al.  Control and Communication Challenges in Networked Real-Time Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Competitive Dynamics in MSTd: A Mechanism for Robust Heading Perception Based on Optic Flow , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  Luke Fletcher,et al.  A perception‐driven autonomous urban vehicle , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[20]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Using Grid Cells for Navigation , 2015, Neuron.

[21]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[22]  M. Sain Finite dimensional linear systems , 1972 .

[23]  May-Britt Moser,et al.  The entorhinal grid map is discretized , 2012, Nature.

[24]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  John Baillieul,et al.  Feedback Designs for Controlling Device Arrays with Communication Channel Bandwidth Constraints , 1999 .

[26]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  Wei Xing Zheng,et al.  Bipartite consensus for multi-agent systems on directed signed networks , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[28]  E. Marder Neuromodulation of Neuronal Circuits: Back to the Future , 2012, Neuron.

[29]  Yajun Fang,et al.  Hierarchical framework for direct gradient-based time-to-contact estimation , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[30]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Perceptual Modalities Guiding Bat Flight in a Native Habitat , 2016, Scientific reports.

[31]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Sustained sensorimotor control as intermittent decisions about prediction errors: computational framework and application to ground vehicle steering , 2017, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  J. Baillieul Data-rate Problems in Feedback Stabilization of Drift-free Nonlinear Control Systems , 2004 .

[33]  Zhaodan Kong,et al.  Saliency based control in random feature networks , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.