Quantitative methods for analyzing cell-cell adhesion in development.

During development cell-cell adhesion is not only crucial to maintain tissue morphogenesis and homeostasis, it also activates signalling pathways important for the regulation of different cellular processes including cell survival, gene expression, collective cell migration and differentiation. Importantly, gene mutations of adhesion receptors can cause developmental disorders and different diseases. Quantitative methods to measure cell adhesion are therefore necessary to understand how cells regulate cell-cell adhesion during development and how aberrations in cell-cell adhesion contribute to disease. Different in vitro adhesion assays have been developed in the past, but not all of them are suitable to study developmentally-related cell-cell adhesion processes, which usually requires working with low numbers of primary cells. In this review, we provide an overview of different in vitro techniques to study cell-cell adhesion during development, including a semi-quantitative cell flipping assay, and quantitative single-cell methods based on atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based single-cell force spectroscopy (SCFS) or dual micropipette aspiration (DPA). Furthermore, we review applications of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based molecular tension sensors to visualize intracellular mechanical forces acting on cell adhesion sites. Finally, we describe a recently introduced method to quantitate cell-generated forces directly in living tissues based on the deformation of oil microdroplets functionalized with adhesion receptor ligands. Together, these techniques provide a comprehensive toolbox to characterize different cell-cell adhesion phenomena during development.

[1]  Hiroki Oda,et al.  Structural and functional diversity of cadherin at the adherens junction , 2011, The Journal of Cell Biology.

[2]  J. Thiery,et al.  Separation Force Measurements Reveal Different Types of Modulation of E-cadherin-based Adhesion by Nectin-1 and -3* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Daniel J. Muller,et al.  BCR/ABL expression of myeloid progenitors increases beta1-integrin mediated adhesion to stromal cells. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Frédéric Pincet,et al.  Enhanced Adhesive Capacities of the Naturally Occurring Ile249–Met280 Variant of the Chemokine Receptor CX3CR1* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  Celeste M Nelson,et al.  VE-cadherin simultaneously stimulates and inhibits cell proliferation by altering cytoskeletal structure and tension , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[6]  G. Wessel,et al.  Intercellular recognition: quantitation of initial binding events. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Schalken,et al.  Cadherin switching in human prostate cancer progression. , 2000, Cancer research.

[8]  K. Page,et al.  Complement Fragment C3a Controls Mutual Cell Attraction during Collective Cell Migration , 2011, Developmental cell.

[9]  William I. Weis,et al.  α-Catenin Is a Molecular Switch that Binds E-Cadherin-β-Catenin and Regulates Actin-Filament Assembly , 2005, Cell.

[10]  Erez Raz,et al.  A role for Rho GTPases and cell–cell adhesion in single-cell motility in vivo , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues , 2013, Nature Methods.

[12]  Y. Pan,et al.  Differential adhesion and actomyosin cable collaborate to drive Echinoid-mediated cell sorting , 2011, Development.

[13]  F. Marga,et al.  Multiple membrane tethers probed by atomic force microscopy. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[14]  O. Muraoka,et al.  E-cadherin is required for gastrulation cell movements in zebrafish , 2005, Mechanisms of Development.

[15]  W. Nelson,et al.  αE-catenin regulates cell-cell adhesion and membrane blebbing during zebrafish epiboly , 2012, Development.

[16]  Hermann E. Gaub,et al.  Discrete interactions in cell adhesion measured by single-molecule force spectroscopy , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  S. Yamada,et al.  Myosin II activity dependent and independent vinculin recruitment to the sites of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion , 2011, BMC Cell Biology.

[18]  Nam‐Gyun Kim,et al.  E-cadherin mediates contact inhibition of proliferation through Hippo signaling-pathway components , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Ning Wang,et al.  Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II–dependent manner , 2010, The Journal of Cell Biology.

[20]  A K Harris,et al.  Is Cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  M. Marsden,et al.  Mechanism of Xenopus cranial neural crest cell migration , 2010, Cell adhesion & migration.

[22]  A. Callan-Jones,et al.  Membrane shape modulates transmembrane protein distribution. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[23]  A. Menke,et al.  Covalent and Density-Controlled Surface Immobilization of E-Cadherin for Adhesion Force Spectroscopy , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  G Wayne Brodland,et al.  The Differential Interfacial Tension Hypothesis (DITH): a comprehensive theory for the self-rearrangement of embryonic cells and tissues. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  Daniel J. Muller,et al.  A bond for a lifetime: employing membrane nanotubes from living cells to determine receptor-ligand kinetics. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  Jean-Léon Maître,et al.  Defective neuroepithelial cell cohesion affects tangential branchiomotor neuron migration in the zebrafish neural tube , 2011, Development.

[27]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Mechanosensitive EPLIN-dependent remodeling of adherens junctions regulates epithelial reshaping , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  E. Evans,et al.  Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  The hypoxia factor Hif-1α controls neural crest chemotaxis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  J. Thiery,et al.  Prototypical Type I E-cadherin and Type II Cadherin-7 Mediate Very Distinct Adhesiveness through Their Extracellular Domains* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  H. Ploegh,et al.  Uvomorulin: a nonintegral membrane protein of early mouse embryo. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Takeichi Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[33]  Anna V. Taubenberger,et al.  AFM‐Based Single‐Cell Force Spectroscopy , 2012 .

[34]  G. Berx,et al.  Involvement of members of the cadherin superfamily in cancer. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[35]  Taekjip Ha,et al.  Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics , 2010, Nature.

[36]  D. Leckband,et al.  Tissue organization by cadherin adhesion molecules: dynamic molecular and cellular mechanisms of morphogenetic regulation. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[37]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Cooperativity in adhesion cluster formation during initial cell adhesion. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[38]  F. Sachs,et al.  Genetically encoded force sensors for measuring mechanical forces in proteins , 2011, Communicative & integrative biology.

[39]  J. Thiery,et al.  Integrins stimulate E-cadherin-mediated intercellular adhesion by regulating Src-kinase activation and actomyosin contractility , 2010, Development.

[40]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  The Influence of Cell Mechanics, Cell-Cell Interactions, and Proliferation on Epithelial Packing , 2007, Current Biology.

[41]  R. Mayor,et al.  The neural crest , 2013, Development.

[42]  S. Chu,et al.  Resolving cadherin interactions and binding cooperativity at the single-molecule level , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  F. Fagotto,et al.  Cadherin-dependent differential cell adhesion in Xenopus causes cell sorting in vitro but not in the embryo , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[44]  W J Nelson,et al.  Mechanism for transition from initial to stable cell-cell adhesion: kinetic analysis of E-cadherin-mediated adhesion using a quantitative adhesion assay , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  C. Petit,et al.  Cadherins as targets for genetic diseases. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[46]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  An Autoinhibited Structure of α-Catenin and Its Implications for Vinculin Recruitment to Adherens Junctions* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Cyril Andrieu,et al.  Collective Cell Migration in Neural Crest , 2015 .

[48]  Jean-Léon Maître,et al.  The role of adhesion energy in controlling cell–cell contacts , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.

[49]  Carl-Philipp Heisenberg,et al.  Biology and Physics of Cell Shape Changes in Development , 2009, Current Biology.

[50]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and tissue segregation in relation to malignancy. , 2004, The International journal of developmental biology.

[51]  W. Weis,et al.  Biochemical and structural analysis of alpha-catenin in cell-cell contacts. , 2008, Biochemical Society transactions.

[52]  S. Yonemura,et al.  α-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[53]  Carsten Werner,et al.  A practical guide to quantify cell adhesion using single-cell force spectroscopy. , 2013, Methods.

[54]  Richard W. Carthew,et al.  Surface mechanics mediate pattern formation in the developing retina , 2004, Nature.

[55]  D. Wedlich,et al.  Xenopus cadherin-11 restrains cranial neural crest migration and influences neural crest specification. , 2001, Development.

[56]  Beth L. Pruitt,et al.  E-cadherin is under constitutive actomyosin-generated tension that is increased at cell–cell contacts upon externally applied stretch , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Mark S Kaiser,et al.  Moesin1 and Ve-cadherin are required in endothelial cells during in vivo tubulogenesis , 2010, Development.

[58]  Vachiranee Limviphuvadh,et al.  Developmental fate and lineage commitment of singled mouse blastomeres , 2012, Development.

[59]  Sami Alom Ruiz,et al.  Mechanical tugging force regulates the size of cell–cell junctions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Cadherin-11 in Synovial Lining Formation and Pathology in Arthritis , 2007, Science.

[61]  Jean-Léon Maître,et al.  Adhesion Functions in Cell Sorting by Mechanically Coupling the Cortices of Adhering Cells , 2012, Science.

[62]  D. Kucik Measurement of adhesion under flow conditions. , 2003, Current protocols in cell biology.

[63]  E. Sackmann,et al.  A micromechanic study of cell polarity and plasma membrane cell body coupling in Dictyostelium. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[64]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Differential adhesion in model systems , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology.

[65]  Fernanda F. Rossetti,et al.  Cell Differentiation of Pluripotent Tissue Sheets Immobilized on Supported Membranes Displaying Cadherin-11 , 2013, PloS one.

[66]  W. Weis,et al.  Alpha-catenin is a molecular switch that binds E-cadherin-beta-catenin and regulates actin-filament assembly. , 2005, Cell.

[67]  W. Nelson,et al.  Cadherins in development: cell adhesion, sorting, and tissue morphogenesis. , 2006, Genes & development.

[68]  Jean-Loup Duband,et al.  Cross Talk between Adhesion Molecules: Control of N-cadherin Activity by Intracellular Signals Elicited by β1 and β3 Integrins in Migrating Neural Crest Cells , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[69]  T. Pieler,et al.  Migratory and adhesive properties of Xenopus laevis primordial germ cells in vitro , 2013, Biology Open.

[70]  R. Mayor,et al.  Cadherin-11 Mediates Contact Inhibition of Locomotion during Xenopus Neural Crest Cell Migration , 2013, PloS one.

[71]  C. Moens,et al.  EphA4 Is Required for Cell Adhesion and Rhombomere-Boundary Formation in the Zebrafish , 2005, Current Biology.

[72]  H. Keller,et al.  Suction pressure can induce uncoupling of the plasma membrane from cortical actin. , 2000, European journal of cell biology.

[73]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Differential adhesion in morphogenesis: a modern view. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[74]  F. Jacob,et al.  Cell-cell interactions in early embryogenesis: A molecular approach to the role of calcium , 1981, Cell.

[75]  Jens Friedrichs,et al.  Revealing Early Steps of α2β1 Integrin-mediated Adhesion to Collagen Type I by Using Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy , 2007 .

[76]  William A. Thomas,et al.  Force measurements in E-cadherin–mediated cell doublets reveal rapid adhesion strengthened by actin cytoskeleton remodeling through Rac and Cdc42 , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[77]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Disorganized epithelial polarity and excess trophectoderm cell fate in preimplantation embryos lacking E-cadherin , 2010, Development.

[78]  S Chien,et al.  Determination of junction avidity of cytolytic T cell and target cell. , 1986, Science.

[79]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Mechanisms guiding primordial germ cell migration: strategies from different organisms , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[80]  P. Rørth,et al.  Collective cell migration. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[81]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Single-molecule analysis of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[82]  M. Takeichi,et al.  EPLIN mediates linkage of the cadherin–catenin complex to F-actin and stabilizes the circumferential actin belt , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[83]  K. Syrigos,et al.  Expression of catenins and E‐cadherin during epithelial restitution in inflammatory bowel disease , 1998, The Journal of pathology.

[84]  P. Hersen,et al.  Strength dependence of cadherin-mediated adhesions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[85]  C. Bertozzi,et al.  The selectins and their ligands. , 1994, Current opinion in cell biology.

[86]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Adhesion in development: an historical overview. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[87]  H. Hansma,et al.  Molecular nanosprings in spider capture-silk threads , 2003, Nature materials.

[88]  Ning Wang,et al.  Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II–dependent manner , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[89]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  Cadherin-11 regulates protrusive activity in Xenopus cranial neural crest cells upstream of Trio and the small GTPases. , 2009, Genes & development.

[90]  Daniel J. Muller,et al.  A new technical approach to quantify cell-cell adhesion forces by AFM. , 2006, Ultramicroscopy.

[91]  T. Lecuit,et al.  Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[92]  W. Nelson,et al.  Synapses: sites of cell recognition, adhesion, and functional specification. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[93]  S. Parkhurst,et al.  Cell wound repair in Drosophila occurs through three distinct phases of membrane and cytoskeletal remodeling , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[94]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[95]  M. Bastmeyer,et al.  Revealing non-genetic adhesive variations in clonal populations by comparative single-cell force spectroscopy. , 2012, Experimental cell research.

[96]  A. Welle,et al.  Benzylguanine thiol self-assembled monolayers for the immobilization of SNAP-tag proteins on microcontact-printed surface structures. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[97]  M. Krieg,et al.  Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[98]  Carl-Philipp Heisenberg,et al.  Three Functions of Cadherins in Cell Adhesion , 2013, Current Biology.

[99]  J. Gordon,et al.  Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Adenomas in Mice Expressing a Dominant Negative N-Cadherin , 1995, Science.

[100]  Konrad Basler,et al.  Opposing Transcriptional Outputs of Hedgehog Signaling and Engrailed Control Compartmental Cell Sorting at the Drosophila A/P Boundary , 2000, Cell.

[101]  D. McClay,et al.  Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[102]  Jens Friedrichs,et al.  Stimulated single‐cell force spectroscopy to quantify cell adhesion receptor crosstalk , 2010, Proteomics.

[103]  S. McKeown,et al.  Expression and function of cell adhesion molecules during neural crest migration 1 2 , 2012 .

[104]  Philippe Marcq,et al.  Mechanical Control of Morphogenesis by Fat/Dachsous/Four-Jointed Planar Cell Polarity Pathway , 2012, Science.

[105]  J. Kashef,et al.  Giving the right tug for migration: cadherins in tissue movements. , 2012, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[106]  Clemens M. Franz,et al.  Atomic Force Microscopy: A Versatile Tool for Studying Cell Morphology, Adhesion and Mechanics , 2008 .

[107]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[108]  Barry Honig,et al.  Sequence and structural determinants of strand swapping in cadherin domains: do all cadherins bind through the same adhesive interface? , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[109]  B. A. Cunningham Cell adhesion molecules as morphoregulators. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[110]  C. Franz,et al.  Investigating differential cell‐matrix adhesion by directly comparative single‐cell force spectroscopy , 2013, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[111]  N. Inoue,et al.  Actomyosin tension is required for correct recruitment of adherens junction components and zonula occludens formation. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[112]  S. Chu,et al.  Resolving Cadherin Interactions at the Single Molecule Level , 2009 .

[113]  G. Charras,et al.  In vivo collective cell migration requires an LPAR2-dependent increase in tissue fluidity , 2014, The Journal of cell biology.