Bag-of-Words model based image classification and evaluation of image sample quality in remote sensing

In this paper, we propose to use Bag-of-Words (BoW) model based methods for the remotely sensed images classification, and also attempt to do research about the image quality and algorithm evaluation. We introduce the Locality-constrained Linear Coding (LLC) for the remotely sensed image classification, and the hard vector quantization and soft vector quantization are adopted for experiments. Regards to the algorithm evaluation, we propose to use a hierarchical model for the image sample quality evaluation as a starting point. The model includes global, class and image level quality, which considers both the image quality and the class separability. Experiments are conducted on the image database selected from google earth and three synthesized databases. Experimental results show that the BoW model based methods are suitable for the remote sensing image classification. However, the advantage of LLC is not as significant as in nature scene image classification. Results of sample evaluation show that the number of middle quality images in a database is the largest, and the quality distribution of a database is consistent with the classification results. The hierarchical model provides an effective quality measurement of remote sensing image samples.

[1]  Qian He,et al.  A hierarchical model for the evaluation of biometric sample quality , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[2]  P. C. Smits,et al.  QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS FOR LAND-COVER MAPPING , 1999 .

[3]  Yikun Li,et al.  Semantic-Sensitive Satellite Image Retrieval , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[5]  Chung-Sheng Li,et al.  Deriving texture feature set for content-based retrieval of satellite image database , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Deren Li,et al.  Object Classification of Aerial Images With Bag-of-Visual Words , 2010, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[7]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A neural-statistical approach to multitemporal and multisource remote-sensing image classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Aerial Image Series Quality Assessment , 2014 .

[9]  Yihong Gong,et al.  Locality-constrained Linear Coding for image classification , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Chi-Ren Shyu,et al.  Visual-Semantic Modeling in Content-Based Geospatial Information Retrieval Using Associative Mining Techniques , 2010, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[11]  Marco Pastori,et al.  Information mining in remote sensing image archives: system concepts , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Fangju Wang,et al.  Fuzzy supervised classification of remote sensing images , 1990 .

[13]  Anil M. Cheriyadat,et al.  Unsupervised Semantic Labeling Framework for Identification of Complex Facilities in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[14]  Shawn D. Newsam,et al.  Bag-of-visual-words and spatial extensions for land-use classification , 2010, GIS '10.

[15]  Pietro Perona,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).