Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.

The goal of cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery is to create symmetric and aesthetically pleasing results in a reproducible manner. Although continued progress is dependent on the ability of plastic surgeons to accurately assess surgical outcomes, available methods to objectively evaluate aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery are limited. This is quite different from other areas of plastic surgery, such as craniomaxillofacial surgery, that often use precise skeletal measurements to provide a platform for preoperative and postoperative analysis. In comparison, systematic evaluation of breast surgery has yet to be standardized. With the advent of three-dimensional photography, objective soft-tissue analysis of the breast is now possible. Recent work from our group and others has validated the use of three-dimensional breast photography in various clinical arenas, including autologous breast reconstruction, prosthetic breast reconstruction, reduction mammaplasty, and augmentation mammaplasty.1–7 Enthusiasm toward three-dimensional imaging technology has stemmed from the ability to not only obtain well-established breast measurements in an accurate manner, but also to generate measurements that were not previously possible with conventional tools, such as total breast volume, volumetric distribution, and breast projection. This article provides an overview of three-dimensional breast photography, with particular emphasis on its potential role to establish a standardized system for breast analysis. We introduce a new concept termed “mammometrics,” in which three-dimensional–based breast measurements can be used to help guide operative planning, objectively analyze surgical results, and document postoperative changes that occur over time.

[1]  E Tezel,et al.  Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  A J Grossman,et al.  A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. , 1980, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  Patricia Rosales,et al.  Comparison between the , 2010 .

[4]  Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer,et al.  New Aspects of Breast Volume Measurement Using 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[5]  R. C. Schultz,et al.  Further Applications of Archimedes' Principle in the Correction of Asymmetrical Breasts , 1986, Annals of plastic surgery.

[6]  M Westreich,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  M. Wickman,et al.  Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[8]  F W Pirruccello,et al.  Plastic and reconstructive surgery. , 1967, IMJ. Illinois medical journal.

[9]  Nolan S. Karp,et al.  An Innovative Three-Dimensional Approach to Defining the Anatomical Changes Occurring after Short Scar-Medial Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  Hiroki Inui,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Reconstructed Breast Using a 3-Dimensional Laser Light Scanner , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[11]  Gernot Brockmann,et al.  Optimization of 3-Dimensional Imaging of the Breast Region With 3-Dimensional Laser Scanners , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[12]  Maurice Y Nahabedian,et al.  Symmetrical Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Role for Three-Dimensional Digital Photography? , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  B. Eppley,et al.  Surgical Cephalometrics: Applications and Developments , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Albert Losken,et al.  Validating Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Breast , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  Hyoung-Seon Baik,et al.  A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  Michael Chiaramonte,et al.  Clinical Applications of Three‐Dimensional Photography in Breast Surgery , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer,et al.  Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. , 2007, Breast.

[18]  O. Tepper,et al.  Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[19]  Peter A Mossey,et al.  Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics. , 2003, European journal of orthodontics.

[20]  Kee-Joon Lee,et al.  A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging. , 2006, World journal of orthodontics.

[21]  N. Bulstrode,et al.  Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. , 2001, Breast.

[22]  O M Antonyshyn,et al.  Facial asymmetry: three-dimensional analysis using laser surface scanning. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  O. Ugland [Breast reduction]. , 1992, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[24]  B. Guyuron Precision Rhinoplasty. Part I: The Role of Life‐Size Photographs and Soft‐Tissue Cephalometric Analysis , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  Mohammad Y Hajeer,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. , 2002, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[26]  Oren Tepper,et al.  Defining the Kinetics of Breast Pseudoptosis After Reduction Mammaplasty , 2009, Annals of plastic surgery.

[27]  Naveen Kumar,et al.  3D Analysis of Breast Augmentation Defines Operative Changes and Their Relationship to Implant Dimensions , 2009, Annals of plastic surgery.