A benchmark-learning roadmap for regional sustainable development in China

Serious environmental problems have accompanied China's remarkable economic growth for decades, which also have direct and indirect impacts on its neighbouring countries. From the perspective of regional sustainable development, a region's macroeconomic policy should be based on its ability to maximize wealth as well as to minimize the environmental impacts for its inhabitants. On the basis of this point, the paper herein analyses the economic–environmental performance for regional levels in China. For each of China's 31 regions, the authors identify two inputs (capital and employment) and four outputs (GDP, sulphur dioxide emissions, soot and industrial dust). The regions are grouped in order to improve similarities. Suitable role models are identified. Aside from traditional technical efficiency scores, a cross-efficiency measure (CEM) is also applied to differentiate the genuine role model. Integration for CEM and cluster analysis is applied to construct a benchmark-learning roadmap for those inefficient regions in order to improve their efficiency progressively.

[1]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[2]  David Gibbs,et al.  Regional development agencies and sustainable development , 1998 .

[3]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[4]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[5]  Kui-wai Li China's Capital and Productivity Measurement Using Financial Resources , 2003 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[8]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[9]  Ram Rachamadugu,et al.  A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1997 .

[10]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[11]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Michael Narodoslawsky,et al.  Islands of Sustainability: A Bottom-up Approach towards Sustainable Development , 1996 .

[14]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Review of Methods for Increasing Discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[15]  David Gibbs,et al.  Ecological modernisation, regional economic development and regional development agencies , 2000 .

[16]  J. Dryzek The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[17]  Ming Wan China's Economic Growth and the Environment in the Asia-Pacific Region , 1998 .

[18]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[19]  T. Stewart A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1992 .

[20]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .