A mathematical model to determine the maximum end-to-end delay bound on label switched path for real time applications over mobile IPv6

The real time applications have driven the demand for increasing and guaranteed bandwidth requirements in the network. Due to the mobility feature within a MN, mobile networks need a more sophisticated mechanism for quality of service provision. Beside, custom routing methods in a Mobile IPv6 network deliver a packet via specific tunnel this causes intermediate routers do not recognize content of a control packet due to adding headers in IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation. In this paper, we propose a mathematical model by using an effective envelope approach to traffic engineering and determine bound of end-to-end delay between MN and correspondent node according to ROMA solution in mobile IPv6 networks. According to this method, every transmitted flow over label switched path should have an end to end delay less than estimated end-to-end delay; otherwise, they will be ignored. This causes an improvement of the network performance and increase achievable link utilization and ultimately increasing quality of services over mobile IPv6 networks. The proposed mathematical model is applicable on label switched path which is a result of ROMA approach to quality of service provision over mobile IPv6 networks.

[1]  Abdul Hanan Abdullah,et al.  A cross-layer scheme for resource reservation based on multi-protocol label switching over mobile IP version6 , 2011 .

[2]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Route Optimization in Nested NEMO: Classification, Evaluation, and Analysis from NEMO Fringe Stub Perspective , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[3]  Christian Vogt,et al.  Early binding updates for mobile IPv6 , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.

[4]  Kenneth P. Laberteaux,et al.  Traffic engineering algorithms using MPLS for service differentiation , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Communications. ICC 2000. Global Convergence Through Communications. Conference Record.

[5]  Chaiwat Oottamakorn,et al.  Effective envelopes: statistical bounds on multiplexed traffic in packet networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[6]  Nallasamy Mani,et al.  Mobility protocols and RSVP performance in wireless IPv6 networks: shortcomings and solutions , 2008 .

[7]  Abdul Hanan Abdullah,et al.  ROMA: Determine the Maximum End-to-end Delay Based on a New Resource Rservation Method over Mobile Ipv6 Routing Architecture , 2011 .

[8]  Abdelhamid Mellouk.  Quality of Service Mechanisms in Next Generation Heterogeneous Networks , 2008 .

[9]  Deguang Le,et al.  Tunnelling-based route optimization for Mobile IPv6 , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security.

[10]  Reza Malekian.  The Study of Handover in Mobile IP Networks , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Broadband Communications, Information Technology & Biomedical Applications.

[11]  Y. Ahmet Sekercioglu,et al.  Mobility-Aware RSVP: A framework for improving the performance of multimedia services over wireless IP-based mobile networks , 2009, Comput. Commun..

[12]  F. Beck,et al.  Monitoring the Neighbor Discovery Protocol , 2007, 2007 International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (ICCGI'07).

[13]  Dieter Hogrefe,et al.  E²T: End-to-End Tunneling Extension to Mobile IPv6 , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[14]  Jia Jia,et al.  Mobile IPv6 Protocol Research and Development , 2009, 2009 International Forum on Information Technology and Applications.

[15]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobile Internetworking with IPv6: Concepts, Principles and Practices , 2007 .