Multilevel genetic analyses of two European supercolonies of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile

Some ants have an extraordinary unicolonial social organization, whereby individuals mix freely among physically separated nests. Recently, it was shown that the European population of Linepithema humile consisted of two enormous unicolonial supercolonies. Workers of the same supercolony are never aggressive to each other. In contrast, aggressiveness is invariably high between workers from different supercolonies. Here we investigated whether gene flow occurs between two supercolonies. We identified a contact zone in which we sampled 46 nests. For each nest, aggression tests were conducted against workers from reference nests from both supercolonies. Workers were always very aggressive towards workers of one of the supercolonies but not to workers of the other. Thus, all nests could be clearly assigned to one of the two supercolonies. For 22 of the 46 nests, we genotyped 15–16 workers at five microsatellite loci. A four‐level hierarchical analysis of variance revealed very strong genetic differentiation between the two supercolonies (FSUPERCOLONY‐TOTAL = 0.541) and low differentiation between sectors (i.e. group of nests connected together with trails) within supercolonies (FSECTOR‐SUPERCOLONY = 0.064). The very high differentiation between the two supercolonies indicates a lack of ongoing gene flow, a conclusion further bolstered by the finding that the two supercolonies share no common alleles at two of the five microsatellite loci. A Bayesian clustering method also revealed the occurrence of two distinct clusters. These clusters exactly match the grouping obtained by aggression tests. None of the 332 genotyped individuals were admixed despite the fact that some nests of the two supercolonies were separated by less than 30 m. These results demonstrate that the two supercolonies have completely separate gene pools.

[1]  D. Gordon,et al.  GENETIC ANALYSIS OF DISPERSAL DYNAMICS IN AN INVADING POPULATION OF ARGENTINE ANTS , 2003 .

[2]  M. Stephens,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. , 2003, Genetics.

[3]  Deborah M Gordon,et al.  Community disassembly by an invasive species , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  K. Ingram PLASTICITY IN QUEEN NUMBER AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN THE INVASIVE ARGENTINE ANT (LINEPITHEMA HUMILE) , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  L. Keller,et al.  Evolution of supercolonies: The Argentine ants of southern Europe , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  L. Keller,et al.  Kin structure and queen execution in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile , 2001 .

[7]  D. Gordon,et al.  Effect of Weather on Infestation of Buildings by the Invasive Argentine Ant, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2001 .

[8]  T. Case,et al.  POPULATION GENETICS AND COLONY STRUCTURE OF THE ARGENTINE ANT (LINEPITHEMA HUMILE) IN ITS NATIVE AND INTRODUCED RANGES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  A. Suarez,et al.  Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  A. Suarez,et al.  Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in southern California: Area, age, and edge effects , 2000 .

[11]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[12]  A. Suarez,et al.  Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  L. Keller,et al.  Mating frequency and genetic structure of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[14]  L. Keller,et al.  Low polymorphism at 19 microsatellite loci in a French population of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) , 1999 .

[15]  Holway,et al.  Loss of intraspecific aggression in the success of a widespread invasive social insect , 1998, Science.

[16]  D. Gordon Pheromone Communication in Social Insects: Ants, Wasps, Bees, and Termites.Robert K. Vander Meer, Michael D. Breed , Karl E. Espelie , Mark L. Winston , 1998 .

[17]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 1997 .

[18]  J. Ott Genetic data analysis II , 1997 .

[19]  F. Rousset Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. , 1997, Genetics.

[20]  M Raymond,et al.  Testing differentiation in diploid populations. , 1996, Genetics.

[21]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genetic Data Analysis II . By Bruce S. Weir, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Sinauer Associates, Inc.445 pages. ISBN 0-87893-902-4. , 1996 .

[22]  D. Gordon,et al.  Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species , 1996, Oecologia.

[23]  F. Rousset,et al.  AN EXACT TEST FOR POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  D. Holway,et al.  Distribution of the Argentine Ant (Linepithema humile) in Northern California , 1995 .

[25]  L. Keller,et al.  The period of sexual maturation and the age at mating in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with intranidal mating , 1992 .

[26]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. , 1992, Genetics.

[27]  F. Ratnieks The Evolution of Genetic Odor-Cue Diversity in Social Hymenoptera , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[28]  J. Gentle,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. , 1990 .

[29]  M. West-Eberhard KIN RECOGNITION IN ANIMALS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  George P. Markin,et al.  The Seasonal Life Cycle of the Argentine Ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Southern California , 1970 .

[32]  X. Espadaler,et al.  The Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, in the Iberian Peninsula. , 2003 .

[33]  B S Weir,et al.  Estimating F-statistics. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[34]  J. Goudet FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995) , 2001 .

[35]  D. Holway,et al.  COMPETITIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE DISPLACEMENT OF NATIVE ANTS BY THE INVASIVE ARGENTINE ANT , 1999 .

[36]  J. Giliomee,et al.  The effect of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), on flower-visiting insects of Protea nitida Mill. (Proteaceae) , 1996 .

[37]  P. Sherman,et al.  Kin recognition. , 1995, Scientific American.

[38]  S. Skaife,et al.  THE ARGENTINE ANT , 1955 .