An empirical investigation of factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and U-business value

This research investigates the factors that influence the use of ubiquitous computing and U-business value. It considers system, information and service qualities as the major factors affecting the use of ubiquitous computing. System quality is measured by accessibility, stability and ease of use. Relevance, accuracy and timeliness are used to measure information quality. Reliability, quickness and secrecy are used to measure service quality. U-business value measures the value created from business operations, business processes, and customer relationships improved by the use of ubiquitous computing. Our results show that system accessibility, information accuracy and timeliness, and service quickness exert crucial influences on ubiquitous computing use. We also find that the use of ubiquitous computing creates value by enhancing business operations, business processes, and customer satisfaction. These findings suggest that information quality is relatively more important than system and service qualities for the creation of value in a ubiquitous computing environment. Our research model and empirical results provide valuable indicators for the direction of future research and also suggest managerial guidelines for the successful development and adoption of ubiquitous computing within an organization.

[1]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[2]  Chang Liu,et al.  Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Andrew E. Fano,et al.  Ubiquitous Services: Extending Customer Relationship Management , 2006 .

[4]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The relevance of social issues in ubiquitous computing environments , 2002, CACM.

[5]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[6]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Implementation and Effects Of One-to-One Computing Initiatives , 2006 .

[7]  Mireia Valverde,et al.  Waiting in line for online services: a qualitative study of the user's perspective , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  V. Sugumaran,et al.  Application of knowledge management technology in customer relationship management , 2003 .

[9]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[10]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  John H. Gerdes,et al.  Timeliness of investor relations data at corporate web sites , 2005, CACM.

[12]  Elgar Fleisch,et al.  The Business Value of Ubiquitous Computing Technologies , 2006 .

[13]  Young-Jun Son,et al.  Effect of information update frequency on the stability of production–inventory control systems , 2007 .

[14]  Don Y. Lee,et al.  Informal information control in complex technological purchase situations , 1999 .

[15]  Ka Lun Eddie Law,et al.  Ubiquitous Content Formulations for Real-Time Information Communications , 2005, EUC.

[16]  Jukka Riekki,et al.  Requesting Pervasive Services by Touching RFID Tags , 2006, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[17]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  K. Yang,et al.  A strategy for third-party logistics systems: A case analysis using the blue ocean strategy , 2008 .

[19]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Upkar Varshney,et al.  Multicast over wireless networks , 2002, CACM.

[21]  Abraham Bernstein,et al.  Software infrastructure and design challenges for ubiquitous computing applications , 2002, CACM.

[22]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes , 2006, MIS Q..

[23]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  A comparison of Magal's service quality instrument with SERVPERF , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Business Intelligence: Second European Summer School, eBISS 2012, Brussels, Belgium, July 15-21, 2012, Tutorial Lectures , 2013 .

[25]  C. Sophie Lee,et al.  Modeling the business value of information technology , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[26]  R. Bagozzi Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment , 1981 .

[27]  Context-Aware Computing Context-Aware Artifacts: Two Development Approaches , 2006 .

[28]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[29]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[30]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[31]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[32]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  An exploratory study into factors of service quality for application service providers , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Omar E. M. Khalil,et al.  EIS Information: Use and Quality Determinants , 2005, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[34]  Mark Weiser The computer for the 21st century , 1991 .

[35]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  Examining the Effects of Computer Self-Efficacy and System Complexity on Technology Acceptance , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[37]  Liwen Vaughan,et al.  New measurements for search engine evaluation proposed and tested , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  Lilian Edwards,et al.  Reconstructing consumer privacy protection on‐line: a modest proposal , 2004 .

[39]  R. Amit,et al.  Value creation in E‐business , 2001 .

[40]  Neville A. Stanton Introduction: Ubiquitous Computing: Anytime, Anyplace, Anywhere? , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  Jim Waldo When the network is everything , 2001, CACM.

[42]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment , 1997 .

[43]  Nenad Jukic,et al.  Data Models for Information Sharing in E-Partnerships: Analysis, Improvements, and Relevance , 2002, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[44]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[45]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Managing Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning , 2005, MIS Q..

[46]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  Chih-Hsiang Wu,et al.  An expert system approach to improving stability and reliability of web service , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  The impact of accessibility on the value of information and the productivity paradox , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Randy V. Bradley,et al.  Information Systems Success in the Context of Different Corporate Cultural Types: An Empirical Investigation , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Jyhjong Lin,et al.  An object-oriented development method for Customer Knowledge Management Information Systems , 2007, Knowl. Based Syst..

[52]  Dan T. Dunn,et al.  Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self‐service technology: The role of performance ambiguity and trust in technology , 2008 .

[53]  Andy Koronios,et al.  Understanding Information Quality in E-Business , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Managing electronic commerce retail transaction costs for customer value , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[55]  Alexander von Eye,et al.  Culture, gender and information technology use: A comparison of Chinese and US children , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  Ben J. Hicks,et al.  Lean information management: Understanding and eliminating waste , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[57]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Bongsik Shin,et al.  Ubiquitous Computing-Driven Business Models: A Case of SK Telecom's Financial Services , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[61]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[62]  Herbjørn Nysveen,et al.  Loyalty of on-line bank customers , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[63]  Mineo Sugiyama Security and Privacy in a Ubiquitous Society , 2004 .

[64]  Qingxiang Wu,et al.  A self-organizing computing network for decision-making in data sets with a diversity of data types , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[65]  Oliver Günther,et al.  Privacy in e-commerce: stated preferences vs. actual behavior , 2005, CACM.

[66]  George Roussos,et al.  Ubiquitous and Pervasive Commerce , 2006 .

[67]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Ubiquitous Computing, Customer Tracking, and Price Discrimination , 2006 .

[68]  Shu-Mei Tseng,et al.  The effects of information technology on knowledge management systems , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[69]  Shun Cai,et al.  Effects of outcome, process and shopping enjoyment on online consumer behaviour , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[70]  Gabriele Anderst-Kotsis,et al.  A semantic solution for data integration in mixed sensor networks , 2005, Comput. Commun..

[71]  R. Watson,et al.  U-commerce: Expanding the universe of marketing , 2002 .

[72]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Zones of Tolerance: Alternative Scales for Measuring Information Systems Service Quality , 2005, MIS Q..

[73]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Toward a Framework for Evaluating Ubiquitous Computing Applications , 2004, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[74]  Rashi Glazer,et al.  Measuring the Value of Information: The Information-Intensive Organization , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[75]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  How are Public Sector Organizations Managing is Outsourcing Risks? An Analysis of Outsourcing Guidelines from Three Jurisdictions , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[76]  Samir K. Srivastava,et al.  Network design for reverse logistics , 2008 .

[77]  Roger McHaney,et al.  A validation of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument in Taiwan , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[78]  M. Weiser The Computer for the Twenty-First Century , 1991 .

[79]  Holger Schütz,et al.  Influence of information about specific absorption rate (SAR) upon customers' purchase decisions and safety evaluation of mobile phones , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[80]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[81]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  New frontiers of application design , 2002, CACM.

[82]  Andrew E. Fano,et al.  The future of business services in the age of ubiquitous computing , 2002, CACM.

[83]  Eldon Y. Li Perceived importance of information system success factors: A meta analysis of group differences , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[84]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[86]  David R. Firth,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 2011 .

[87]  Solomon Negash Business Intelligence , 2011, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.