A life cycle greenhouse gas inventory of a tree production system

PurposeThis study provides a detailed, process-based life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory of an ornamental tree production system for urban forestry. The success of large-scale tree planting initiatives for climate protection depends on projects being net sinks for CO2 over their entire life cycle. However, previous assessments of urban tree planting initiatives have not accounted for the inputs required for tree production in nurseries, which include greenhouse systems, irrigation, and fertilization. A GHG inventory of nursery operations for tree production is a necessary step to assess the life cycle benefits or drawbacks of large-scale tree planting activities.MethodsUsing surveys, interviews, and life cycle inventory databases, we developed a process-based life cycle inventory of GHG emissions for a large nursery operation in California, USA.Results and discussionThe inventory demonstrated that 4.6 kg of CO2-equivalent is emitted per #5 (nominally a 5-gallon) tree, a common tree size produced by nurseries. Energy use contributed 44% of all CO2-equivalent emissions, of which electricity and propane constituted 78%. Electricity use is dominated by irrigation demands, and propane is used primarily for greenhouse heating. Material inputs constituted the next largest contributor at 36% of emissions; plastic containers contributed just over half of these emissions. Transport emissions accounted for 16% of total nursery GHG emissions. Shipping bamboo stakes from China (43%) and diesel fuel consumed by nursery delivery trucks (33%) were the largest transport emission sources.ConclusionsGHG emissions from the tree production life stage are 20% to 50% of mean annual CO2 storage rates based on urban tree inventories for three California cities. While considering nursery production alone is insufficient for drawing conclusions about the net climate change benefits of tree planting initiatives, the results demonstrate that nursery production emissions are modest compared with CO2 storage rates during tree life. Identifying key sources of emissions in the nursery tree production system can help operators reduce emissions by targeting so-called hot-spots. In particular, switching to renewable energy sources, capitalizing on energy and water efficiency opportunities, container light-weighting, and sourcing bamboo stakes from producers closer to the point of use are potential avenues for reduced emissions.

[1]  Giovanni Russo,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION BY MEANS OF LCA REGARDING THE ORNAMENTAL NURSERY PRODUCTION IN ROSE AND SOWBREAD GREENHOUSE CULTIVATION , 2008 .

[2]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Effects of Urban Tree Management and Species Selection on Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 2002, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[3]  Staffan Berg,et al.  Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden , 2005 .

[4]  Tom N. Kalnes,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil , 2011 .

[5]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system , 2003 .

[6]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[7]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters , 1999 .

[8]  J. Simpson,et al.  A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA , 2002 .

[9]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Life-Cycle Impacts of Forest Resource Activities in the Pacific Northwest and Southeast United States , 2005 .

[10]  Niels Jungbluth,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment for Photovoltaics: Update Within Ecoinvent Data v2.0 , 2008 .

[11]  Southeastern Forest Experiment Station General technical report , 1985 .

[12]  H. Akbari Shade trees reduce building energy use and CO2 emissions from power plants. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[13]  A.A.J.F. Van den Dobbelsteen,et al.  An environmental, economic and practical assessment of bamboo as a building material for supporting structures , 2006 .

[14]  Y Aldentun Life cycle inventory of forest seedling production — from seed to regeneration site , 2002 .

[15]  E. Gregory McPherson,et al.  Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Sacramento's Urban Forest , 1998, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[16]  Maureen E. Puettmann,et al.  LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF WOOD PRODUCTS: CRADLE-TO-GATE LCI OF RESIDENTIAL WOOD BUILDING MATERIALS , 2005 .

[17]  Chunxia Wu,et al.  Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment , 2011 .

[18]  Qingfu Xiao,et al.  Municipal Forest Benefits and Costs in Five US Cities , 2005 .

[19]  Edie Sonne,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[20]  Masson-Delmotte,et al.  The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[21]  M. Deru,et al.  U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database Roadmap (Brochure) , 2009 .

[22]  D. Nowak,et al.  Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[23]  David J. Nowak,et al.  Connecting People with Ecosystems in the 21st Century : An Assessment of Our Nation's Urban Forests , 2000 .

[24]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[25]  M. Saier,et al.  Climate Change, 2007 , 2007 .