Results on Sophisticated Voting in an Experimental Setting

This research explores the extent of sophisticated voting in a simplified agenda setting. We begin from the commonly held presumption that decision makers (whether legislators or school board members) employ sophisticated strategies when voting. This viewpoint has been rigorously modeled under a variety of formal theories. However, given that there is little corroborative empirical evidence that decision makers use sophisticated voting strategies, we turn to a series of laboratory experiments designed to test the extent to which sophisticated voting is relied upon. Our findings are at odds with a general claim that sophisticated behavior is ubiquitous.

[1]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Strategic Voting in Agenda-Controlled Committees , 1988 .

[2]  Rick K. Wilson,et al.  Evidence of sophisticated voting in a committee setting: theory and experiments , 1987 .

[3]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Agendas and the Control of Political Outcomes , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Richard D. McKelvey,et al.  Covering, Dominance, and Institution Free Properties of Social Choice , 1986 .

[5]  Kenneth A. Shepsle,et al.  Farquharson and Fenno: Sophisticated Voting and Home Style , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Dan S. Felsenthal,et al.  Sincere and strategic voters: An Israeli study , 1985 .

[7]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Sophisticated voting under the plurality procedure: A test of a new definition , 1985 .

[8]  Barry R. Weingast,et al.  Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions , 1984 .

[9]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Sophisticated Voting under the Plurality Procedure , 1982 .

[10]  James M. Enelow,et al.  The Amendment in Legislative Strategy: Sophisticated Voting in the U.S. Congress , 1980, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  Nicholas R. Miller.  A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting: Further Graph- Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting , 1980 .

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Thought , 1979 .

[13]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A multistage game representation of sophisticated voting for binary procedures , 1978 .

[14]  C. Plott,et al.  A Model of Agenda Influence on Committee Decisions , 1978 .

[15]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Strategic Voting in Scandinavian Parliaments , 1978 .

[16]  Game-theoretic models of bloc-voting under proportional representation , 1974 .

[17]  Gerald H. Kramer,et al.  Sophisticated voting over multidimensional choice spaces , 1972 .

[18]  W. Kintsch.  Learning, memory, and conceptual processes , 1970 .

[19]  Robin Farquharson,et al.  Theory of voting , 1969 .

[20]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .