Experimental test of vision-based navigation and system identification of an unmanned underwater survey vehicle (SAGA) for the yaw motion

In this study, a nonlinear mathematical model for an unmanned underwater survey vehicle (SAGA) is obtained. The structure of the mathematical model of the vehicle comes from a Newton–Euler formulation. The yaw motion is realized by a suitable combination of right and left thrusters. The navigation problem is solved by using the inertial navigation system and vision-based measurements together. These are integrated to more accurately obtain navigation data for the vehicle. In addition, the magnetic compass is used to support the attitude information of the vehicle. A pool experimental set-up is designed to test the navigation system. Performance of the resultant navigation system can be analysed by creating suitable system state, measurement and noise models. The navigational data for the vehicle has been improved using a Kalman filter. The mathematical model of the vehicle includes some unknown parameters such as added mass and damping coefficients. It is not possible to determine all the parameter values as their effects on the state of the system are usually negligible. On the other hand, most of the ‘important’ parameters are obtained based on a system identification study of the vehicle using this estimated navigational data for coupled motion. This study is performed in a MATLAB/Simulink environment.

[1]  Hsin-Hung Chen,et al.  Vision-based tracking with projective mapping for parameter identification of remotely operated vehicles , 2008 .

[2]  Taesam Kang,et al.  Simultaneous Determination of Drag Coefficient and Added Mass , 2011, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[3]  Jeff Smith,et al.  Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation , 1995 .

[4]  Benjamin R. Dzikowicz,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Navigation Using a Beacon With a Spiral Wave Front , 2015, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  Xiaoji Niu,et al.  Analysis and Modeling of Inertial Sensors Using Allan Variance , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[6]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Guidance and control of ocean vehicles , 1994 .

[7]  Marco Piras,et al.  Performances comparison of different MEMS-based IMUs , 2010, IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.

[8]  Sajad Saeedi,et al.  AUV Navigation and Localization: A Review , 2014, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  Vason P. Srini,et al.  A vision for supporting autonomous navigation in urban environments , 2006, Computer.

[10]  Brian Bingham,et al.  Hypothesis grids: improving long baseline navigation for autonomous underwater vehicles , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[11]  Bong-Huan Jun,et al.  Pseudo long base line navigation algorithm for underwater vehicles with inertial sensors and two acoustic range measurements , 2007 .

[12]  Lars E. Sjöberg,et al.  Stochastic modelling and analysis of IMU sensor errors , 2011 .

[13]  Kyu-Yeul Lee,et al.  Estimation of hydrodynamic coefficients for an AUV using nonlinear observers , 2002 .

[14]  J. Junkins,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems , 2004 .

[15]  Agus Budiyono,et al.  Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multi-sensor Integrated Navigation Systems , 2012 .

[16]  G. C. Bishop Gravitational field maps and navigational errors [unmanned underwater vehicles] , 2002 .

[17]  Andreas Løberg Carlsen Navigational Assistance for Mini-ROV , 2010 .

[18]  O Hegrenaes,et al.  Model-Aided INS With Sea Current Estimation for Robust Underwater Navigation , 2011, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.